Application of SuperDARN interferometry for improved estimates of Doppler velocity and echo geolocation

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Radio Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1029/2024RS008084
P. Ponomarenko;M. Ghalamkarian Nejad;A. V. Koustov
{"title":"Application of SuperDARN interferometry for improved estimates of Doppler velocity and echo geolocation","authors":"P. Ponomarenko;M. Ghalamkarian Nejad;A. V. Koustov","doi":"10.1029/2024RS008084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been previously established that the Doppler velocities of F-region ionospheric echoes observed by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) at high frequencies (HF, 8–20 MHz) are persistently lower than those measured by other instruments at the same locations. This was attributed to the ionospheric refractive index for HF radio waves being noticeably smaller than one. The refractive index values can be obtained in two ways: based on electron density estimates from a co-located instrument or a model, or by deriving them from SuperDARN elevation angle data. To compare these methods, we considered line-of-sight Doppler velocity observations by the Rankin Inlet (RKN) SuperDARN radar and the Resolute Bay Incoherent Scatter Radars (RISR). The velocity data were supplemented by electron density measurements from RISR. The elevation angle data were also used for accurate determination of SuperDARN echo geolocation because the actual ground range to the echo location may significantly differ from that obtained with the conventional SuperDARN models. The RISR Doppler velocity values were used as a reference to the RKN observations via 0.5-hop and 1.5-hop propagation paths. Correction by the index of refraction based on both maximum electron density from the RISR and elevation angle data from RKN brought 0.5-hop data close to the RISR velocity values, with the latter representing a self-contained approach. However, for 1.5-hop echoes from the polar cap, the uncorrected SuperDARN velocities exceeded those from RISR. We discuss potential causes of this apparent anomaly.","PeriodicalId":49638,"journal":{"name":"Radio Science","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radio Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10872834/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been previously established that the Doppler velocities of F-region ionospheric echoes observed by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) at high frequencies (HF, 8–20 MHz) are persistently lower than those measured by other instruments at the same locations. This was attributed to the ionospheric refractive index for HF radio waves being noticeably smaller than one. The refractive index values can be obtained in two ways: based on electron density estimates from a co-located instrument or a model, or by deriving them from SuperDARN elevation angle data. To compare these methods, we considered line-of-sight Doppler velocity observations by the Rankin Inlet (RKN) SuperDARN radar and the Resolute Bay Incoherent Scatter Radars (RISR). The velocity data were supplemented by electron density measurements from RISR. The elevation angle data were also used for accurate determination of SuperDARN echo geolocation because the actual ground range to the echo location may significantly differ from that obtained with the conventional SuperDARN models. The RISR Doppler velocity values were used as a reference to the RKN observations via 0.5-hop and 1.5-hop propagation paths. Correction by the index of refraction based on both maximum electron density from the RISR and elevation angle data from RKN brought 0.5-hop data close to the RISR velocity values, with the latter representing a self-contained approach. However, for 1.5-hop echoes from the polar cap, the uncorrected SuperDARN velocities exceeded those from RISR. We discuss potential causes of this apparent anomaly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radio Science
Radio Science 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Radio Science (RDS) publishes original scientific contributions on radio-frequency electromagnetic-propagation and its applications. Contributions covering measurement, modelling, prediction and forecasting techniques pertinent to fields and waves - including antennas, signals and systems, the terrestrial and space environment and radio propagation problems in radio astronomy - are welcome. Contributions may address propagation through, interaction with, and remote sensing of structures, geophysical media, plasmas, and materials, as well as the application of radio frequency electromagnetic techniques to remote sensing of the Earth and other bodies in the solar system.
期刊最新文献
Angle and polarization insensitive RCS reduction metasurface based on hybrid mechanism of polarization conversion and absorption Application of SuperDARN interferometry for improved estimates of Doppler velocity and echo geolocation A novel flexible ultra wide band wearable slot antenna with defected ground for WBAN applications Agile detection of DRM signal via GLRT A novel blind adaptive 3D beam steering algorithm for interference mitigation and performance enhancement in massive MIMO systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1