New methods for extraction of phenolic, flavonoids and catechin compounds from natural sources

IF 2.2 4区 化学 Q2 Engineering Chemical Papers Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s11696-024-03778-8
Rokia B. Mousa, Rahma M. Abd Elalim, Nada E. Atala, Habiba A. Elkayaly, Emad A. Shalaby
{"title":"New methods for extraction of phenolic, flavonoids and catechin compounds from natural sources","authors":"Rokia B. Mousa,&nbsp;Rahma M. Abd Elalim,&nbsp;Nada E. Atala,&nbsp;Habiba A. Elkayaly,&nbsp;Emad A. Shalaby","doi":"10.1007/s11696-024-03778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extraction of phenolic compounds from natural sources is crucial for their utilization in various applications, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. However, current extraction methods often suffer from drawbacks such as low yield, long extraction times, and the use of harsh chemicals. The present study aimed to assess in vitro the antioxidant activities of solvent extracts from different wild plants (green tea, al sidr, and sage), in addition to introducing a novel, environmentally friendly method for extracting phenolic compounds from different wild plants and finding the best solvent system for extraction of different phenolic compounds. In the present work, 15 solvent extracts from 3 plant samples were evaluated against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and potassium permanganate (KMnO<sub>4</sub>) as non-radical reagents and compared with ascorbic acid as a natural standard antioxidant, in addition to the analysis of the chemical constituents of promising extracts from wild plants using HPLC. The obtained results revealed that both methods go in parallel, showing that the concentration of extract and incubation time are dependent and proportional to the concentration of phenolic compounds. Buffer-ethanol extract from green tea plant recorded the highest antioxidant activity when compared with other solvent extracts, with more than 95% against the DPPH radical method, but the activities decreased in the case of the KMnO<sub>4</sub> method. Thus, the HPLC analysis of aqueous extracts of promising buffer and buffer-ethanol solvent systems for the 3 plants showed a highly complex profile, containing approximately 14 and 18 different components. From these compounds, gallic acid recorded the highest concentration for green tea in both extracts at 982.06 and 275.06 µg/ml, respectively. While rosmarinic acid recorded the highest concentration for sage in buffer-ethanol extract at 395.93 µg/ml. From the obtained results, it could be concluded that the solvent extracts of plant samples are rich in different active ingredients, especially phenolic compounds and their derivatives. The extracts from green tea, especially with buffer solution, are more acceptable when compared with other extracts. Buffer, ethanol, and ethanol-buffer extracts (from al sidr, sage, and green tea) recorded high concentrations of phenolic compounds and their derivatives and exhibited antioxidant activity, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":513,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Papers","volume":"79 1","pages":"247 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11696-024-03778-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extraction of phenolic compounds from natural sources is crucial for their utilization in various applications, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. However, current extraction methods often suffer from drawbacks such as low yield, long extraction times, and the use of harsh chemicals. The present study aimed to assess in vitro the antioxidant activities of solvent extracts from different wild plants (green tea, al sidr, and sage), in addition to introducing a novel, environmentally friendly method for extracting phenolic compounds from different wild plants and finding the best solvent system for extraction of different phenolic compounds. In the present work, 15 solvent extracts from 3 plant samples were evaluated against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and potassium permanganate (KMnO4) as non-radical reagents and compared with ascorbic acid as a natural standard antioxidant, in addition to the analysis of the chemical constituents of promising extracts from wild plants using HPLC. The obtained results revealed that both methods go in parallel, showing that the concentration of extract and incubation time are dependent and proportional to the concentration of phenolic compounds. Buffer-ethanol extract from green tea plant recorded the highest antioxidant activity when compared with other solvent extracts, with more than 95% against the DPPH radical method, but the activities decreased in the case of the KMnO4 method. Thus, the HPLC analysis of aqueous extracts of promising buffer and buffer-ethanol solvent systems for the 3 plants showed a highly complex profile, containing approximately 14 and 18 different components. From these compounds, gallic acid recorded the highest concentration for green tea in both extracts at 982.06 and 275.06 µg/ml, respectively. While rosmarinic acid recorded the highest concentration for sage in buffer-ethanol extract at 395.93 µg/ml. From the obtained results, it could be concluded that the solvent extracts of plant samples are rich in different active ingredients, especially phenolic compounds and their derivatives. The extracts from green tea, especially with buffer solution, are more acceptable when compared with other extracts. Buffer, ethanol, and ethanol-buffer extracts (from al sidr, sage, and green tea) recorded high concentrations of phenolic compounds and their derivatives and exhibited antioxidant activity, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Papers
Chemical Papers Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
590
期刊介绍: Chemical Papers is a peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to basic and applied chemical research. It has a broad scope covering the chemical sciences, but favors interdisciplinary research and studies that bring chemistry together with other disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Retraction Note: The effect of oxidation pretreatment of polymer template on the formation and catalytic activity of Au/PET membrane composites Correction: Anti-proliferative activity of dithiocarbamate salts: Synthesis and in vitro study Determination of glucose oxidase activity of flour additive by fluorescence quenching method Assessment of phenolic, flavonoid, total antioxidant, and anthocyanin contents of various colored hawthorn fruits for their potential as functional foods Correction: Investigation of the structural, electronic, magnetic, mechanical, and optical properties of calcium-based CaJO3 (J = Mn, Ru) perovskites: A first-principle computations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1