New methods for extraction of phenolic, flavonoids and catechin compounds from natural sources

IF 2.5 4区 化学 Q2 Engineering Chemical Papers Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s11696-024-03778-8
Rokia B. Mousa, Rahma M. Abd Elalim, Nada E. Atala, Habiba A. Elkayaly, Emad A. Shalaby
{"title":"New methods for extraction of phenolic, flavonoids and catechin compounds from natural sources","authors":"Rokia B. Mousa,&nbsp;Rahma M. Abd Elalim,&nbsp;Nada E. Atala,&nbsp;Habiba A. Elkayaly,&nbsp;Emad A. Shalaby","doi":"10.1007/s11696-024-03778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extraction of phenolic compounds from natural sources is crucial for their utilization in various applications, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. However, current extraction methods often suffer from drawbacks such as low yield, long extraction times, and the use of harsh chemicals. The present study aimed to assess in vitro the antioxidant activities of solvent extracts from different wild plants (green tea, al sidr, and sage), in addition to introducing a novel, environmentally friendly method for extracting phenolic compounds from different wild plants and finding the best solvent system for extraction of different phenolic compounds. In the present work, 15 solvent extracts from 3 plant samples were evaluated against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and potassium permanganate (KMnO<sub>4</sub>) as non-radical reagents and compared with ascorbic acid as a natural standard antioxidant, in addition to the analysis of the chemical constituents of promising extracts from wild plants using HPLC. The obtained results revealed that both methods go in parallel, showing that the concentration of extract and incubation time are dependent and proportional to the concentration of phenolic compounds. Buffer-ethanol extract from green tea plant recorded the highest antioxidant activity when compared with other solvent extracts, with more than 95% against the DPPH radical method, but the activities decreased in the case of the KMnO<sub>4</sub> method. Thus, the HPLC analysis of aqueous extracts of promising buffer and buffer-ethanol solvent systems for the 3 plants showed a highly complex profile, containing approximately 14 and 18 different components. From these compounds, gallic acid recorded the highest concentration for green tea in both extracts at 982.06 and 275.06 µg/ml, respectively. While rosmarinic acid recorded the highest concentration for sage in buffer-ethanol extract at 395.93 µg/ml. From the obtained results, it could be concluded that the solvent extracts of plant samples are rich in different active ingredients, especially phenolic compounds and their derivatives. The extracts from green tea, especially with buffer solution, are more acceptable when compared with other extracts. Buffer, ethanol, and ethanol-buffer extracts (from al sidr, sage, and green tea) recorded high concentrations of phenolic compounds and their derivatives and exhibited antioxidant activity, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":513,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Papers","volume":"79 1","pages":"247 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11696-024-03778-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extraction of phenolic compounds from natural sources is crucial for their utilization in various applications, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. However, current extraction methods often suffer from drawbacks such as low yield, long extraction times, and the use of harsh chemicals. The present study aimed to assess in vitro the antioxidant activities of solvent extracts from different wild plants (green tea, al sidr, and sage), in addition to introducing a novel, environmentally friendly method for extracting phenolic compounds from different wild plants and finding the best solvent system for extraction of different phenolic compounds. In the present work, 15 solvent extracts from 3 plant samples were evaluated against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and potassium permanganate (KMnO4) as non-radical reagents and compared with ascorbic acid as a natural standard antioxidant, in addition to the analysis of the chemical constituents of promising extracts from wild plants using HPLC. The obtained results revealed that both methods go in parallel, showing that the concentration of extract and incubation time are dependent and proportional to the concentration of phenolic compounds. Buffer-ethanol extract from green tea plant recorded the highest antioxidant activity when compared with other solvent extracts, with more than 95% against the DPPH radical method, but the activities decreased in the case of the KMnO4 method. Thus, the HPLC analysis of aqueous extracts of promising buffer and buffer-ethanol solvent systems for the 3 plants showed a highly complex profile, containing approximately 14 and 18 different components. From these compounds, gallic acid recorded the highest concentration for green tea in both extracts at 982.06 and 275.06 µg/ml, respectively. While rosmarinic acid recorded the highest concentration for sage in buffer-ethanol extract at 395.93 µg/ml. From the obtained results, it could be concluded that the solvent extracts of plant samples are rich in different active ingredients, especially phenolic compounds and their derivatives. The extracts from green tea, especially with buffer solution, are more acceptable when compared with other extracts. Buffer, ethanol, and ethanol-buffer extracts (from al sidr, sage, and green tea) recorded high concentrations of phenolic compounds and their derivatives and exhibited antioxidant activity, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从天然来源中提取酚类、黄酮类和儿茶素化合物的新方法
从天然来源中提取酚类化合物对于其在各种应用中的利用至关重要,包括食品,药品和化妆品。然而,目前的提取方法往往存在收率低、提取时间长、使用刺激性化学物质等缺点。本研究旨在对不同野生植物(绿茶、山楂、鼠尾草)溶剂提取物的体外抗氧化活性进行评价,并介绍一种新的、环保的提取不同野生植物中酚类化合物的方法,寻找提取不同酚类化合物的最佳溶剂体系。本研究以3种植物样品的15种溶剂提取物为研究对象,以2,2 -二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)和高锰酸钾(KMnO4)为非自由基试剂,并与抗坏血酸作为天然标准抗氧化剂进行比较,同时利用高效液相色谱法分析了野生植物中有前途的提取物的化学成分。结果表明,两种方法是平行的,表明提取液的浓度和培养时间与酚类化合物的浓度成正比。与其他溶剂提取物相比,绿茶缓冲液-乙醇提取物的抗氧化活性最高,对DPPH自由基法的抗氧化活性达到95%以上,但对KMnO4法的抗氧化活性降低。因此,这3种植物的缓冲液和缓冲液-乙醇溶剂体系的水提取物的HPLC分析显示出高度复杂的图谱,包含大约14和18种不同的成分。在这些化合物中,绿茶提取物中没食子酸的浓度最高,分别为982.06µg/ml和275.06µg/ml。鼠尾草中迷迭香酸浓度最高,为395.93µg/ml。结果表明,植物样品的溶剂提取物中含有丰富的活性成分,尤其是酚类化合物及其衍生物。与其他提取物相比,绿茶提取物,特别是有缓冲液的提取物,更容易被接受。缓冲液、乙醇和乙醇-缓冲液提取物(从芦笋、鼠尾草和绿茶中提取)分别记录了高浓度的酚类化合物及其衍生物,并显示出抗氧化活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Papers
Chemical Papers Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
590
期刊介绍: Chemical Papers is a peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to basic and applied chemical research. It has a broad scope covering the chemical sciences, but favors interdisciplinary research and studies that bring chemistry together with other disciplines.
期刊最新文献
A review on impact of eco-conscious materials and processes on the photovoltaic performance of solar cells Face-degree and reverse-degree topological indices for quantitative structure property predictions of benzenoid hydrocarbons Computational molecular dynamics unveils polyphenolic luteolin and pedalitin as promising scaffolds targeting MPS1/TTK kinase for developing novel cancer therapeutics Hybrid approach for enhanced synthesis and efficiency prediction of sulfur–nitrogen co-doped Fe2O3 nanostructures in methylene blue dye removal processes Study on the effect of electronic carriers on extracellular electron transfer microbial corrosion in carbon starvation environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1