Peeling an architected interface: roles of softness and fractoadhesive length in adhesion toughening

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Fracture Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s10704-024-00835-x
Zumrat Usmanova, Ruobing Bai
{"title":"Peeling an architected interface: roles of softness and fractoadhesive length in adhesion toughening","authors":"Zumrat Usmanova,&nbsp;Ruobing Bai","doi":"10.1007/s10704-024-00835-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soft adhesion has been rapidly studied and developed for various applications in recent years. Compared to existing toughening mechanisms based on the adherend or adhesive materials themselves, building architectures or patterns in soft adhesion offers an attractive way of enhancing adhesion without modifying the intrinsic material properties. However, despite the recent progress in soft architected adhesion, the fundamental interplay between the geometry and material properties remains largely unexplored. This results in questions about the geometric conditions for effective toughening and the roles of intrinsic material parameters in governing these conditions. Here we explore the geometry-elasticity interplay in toughening a soft architected bilayer with one-dimensional rectangular interfacial pillars. Using finite element simulations on 90-degree peel, we investigate effects of the adherend modulus, pillar aspect ratio, and interfacial contact ratio on the peel strength. We show that compared to a uniform interface, soft interfacial pillars (shear modulus ~ 0.6 MPa) with a high aspect ratio (&gt; 4) can enhance the peel strength to more than 4 times, while stiff pillars (shear modulus ~ 1.5 MPa) only provide a limited enhancement (up to 1.5 times). Such enhancement is further amplified by increasing the interfacial contact ratio, where the best enhancement occurs when pillars are closely packed like a cross-cut surface (100% in contact yet architected). We develop a theory and scaling for the effective adhesion toughness and identify the fractoadhesive length of architected adhesion. We show that the fractoadhesive length provides a lower bound of the architecture feature size for effective toughening, while a large stretch at debonding in pillars further amplifies the toughening. Using an Ashby plot of the relevant architecture feature size and the fractoadhesive length in various architected adhesion systems, we conclude that macroscale architectures are necessary for effective toughening of soft adhesion with large fractoadhesive lengths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":590,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fracture","volume":"249 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10704-024-00835-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fracture","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10704-024-00835-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft adhesion has been rapidly studied and developed for various applications in recent years. Compared to existing toughening mechanisms based on the adherend or adhesive materials themselves, building architectures or patterns in soft adhesion offers an attractive way of enhancing adhesion without modifying the intrinsic material properties. However, despite the recent progress in soft architected adhesion, the fundamental interplay between the geometry and material properties remains largely unexplored. This results in questions about the geometric conditions for effective toughening and the roles of intrinsic material parameters in governing these conditions. Here we explore the geometry-elasticity interplay in toughening a soft architected bilayer with one-dimensional rectangular interfacial pillars. Using finite element simulations on 90-degree peel, we investigate effects of the adherend modulus, pillar aspect ratio, and interfacial contact ratio on the peel strength. We show that compared to a uniform interface, soft interfacial pillars (shear modulus ~ 0.6 MPa) with a high aspect ratio (> 4) can enhance the peel strength to more than 4 times, while stiff pillars (shear modulus ~ 1.5 MPa) only provide a limited enhancement (up to 1.5 times). Such enhancement is further amplified by increasing the interfacial contact ratio, where the best enhancement occurs when pillars are closely packed like a cross-cut surface (100% in contact yet architected). We develop a theory and scaling for the effective adhesion toughness and identify the fractoadhesive length of architected adhesion. We show that the fractoadhesive length provides a lower bound of the architecture feature size for effective toughening, while a large stretch at debonding in pillars further amplifies the toughening. Using an Ashby plot of the relevant architecture feature size and the fractoadhesive length in various architected adhesion systems, we conclude that macroscale architectures are necessary for effective toughening of soft adhesion with large fractoadhesive lengths.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fracture
International Journal of Fracture 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fracture is an outlet for original analytical, numerical and experimental contributions which provide improved understanding of the mechanisms of micro and macro fracture in all materials, and their engineering implications. The Journal is pleased to receive papers from engineers and scientists working in various aspects of fracture. Contributions emphasizing empirical correlations, unanalyzed experimental results or routine numerical computations, while representing important necessary aspects of certain fatigue, strength, and fracture analyses, will normally be discouraged; occasional review papers in these as well as other areas are welcomed. Innovative and in-depth engineering applications of fracture theory are also encouraged. In addition, the Journal welcomes, for rapid publication, Brief Notes in Fracture and Micromechanics which serve the Journal''s Objective. Brief Notes include: Brief presentation of a new idea, concept or method; new experimental observations or methods of significance; short notes of quality that do not amount to full length papers; discussion of previously published work in the Journal, and Brief Notes Errata.
期刊最新文献
Cohesive instability in elastomers: insights from a crosslinked Van der Waals fluid model Phase field modeling of anisotropic silicon crystalline cracking in 3D thin-walled photovoltaic laminates Peeling an architected interface: roles of softness and fractoadhesive length in adhesion toughening Heterogeneous fracture toughness of human cortical bone tissue Interpretable crack features for the representation of kinematic fields in the case of fatigue overloads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1