The Forgotten Voices: Enabling Children and Young People With Intellectual Disability to Express Their Views on Their Inpatient Hospital Experience

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1111/hex.70168
Jo Wray, Jessica Russell, Faith Gibson, Charlotte Kenten, Kate Oulton
{"title":"The Forgotten Voices: Enabling Children and Young People With Intellectual Disability to Express Their Views on Their Inpatient Hospital Experience","authors":"Jo Wray,&nbsp;Jessica Russell,&nbsp;Faith Gibson,&nbsp;Charlotte Kenten,&nbsp;Kate Oulton","doi":"10.1111/hex.70168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The importance of enabling patients to provide feedback on their experience of healthcare is widely accepted but there are few appropriate measures to enable children and young people to directly provide feedback, particularly those with intellectual disability or younger children. Our primary aim was to develop and test patient-reported experience measures for children and young people with intellectual disability who use inpatient hospital services. A secondary aim was to test these measures with younger children aged 4–7 years without intellectual disability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A hospital inpatient patient-reported experience measure previously developed for children aged 8–11 years was revised iteratively in conjunction with a parent advisory group (comprising five parents of children and young people with and without intellectual disability) and children and young people with intellectual disability. The final patient-reported experience measure was tested in children's inpatient wards at seven hospitals in England over a 3-month period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Parents suggested a need for a single patient-reported experience measure for all children with intellectual disability which contained simpler language, fewer questions and response options, and images to illustrate each question. The final patient-reported experience measure had 22 questions, each with a corresponding image, and a free text box in which children could add anything further. Questions addressed environment, people, care and treatment and safety.</p>\n \n <p>During testing at seven children's hospitals, 52 children and young people with intellectual disability (4–18 years) and 76 children without intellectual disability (4–7 years), all of whom received inpatient care, completed the patient-reported experience measure. Two percent of data were missing; in 16 instances respondents either ticked two responses or placed a tick between two response categories. Half the respondents added comments and/or drew a picture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The development of a patient-reported experience measure for children and young people with intellectual disability provides a previously unavailable opportunity for them to report on their experiences of inpatient care and have their voices heard. Future work to extend testing to a wider group is underway and will enable us to clarify whether one patient-reported experience measure is valid and reliable for all children and young people with intellectual disability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>A parent advisory group, comprising parents/carers of young people with or without a learning disability, advised on all aspects of the wider study design and specifically on revisions to the measure reported in this manuscript. The parent advisory group met twice a year during the study with email contact between meetings for specific requests and study updates. Representatives of the advisory group also attended the study steering group.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70168","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The importance of enabling patients to provide feedback on their experience of healthcare is widely accepted but there are few appropriate measures to enable children and young people to directly provide feedback, particularly those with intellectual disability or younger children. Our primary aim was to develop and test patient-reported experience measures for children and young people with intellectual disability who use inpatient hospital services. A secondary aim was to test these measures with younger children aged 4–7 years without intellectual disability.

Methods

A hospital inpatient patient-reported experience measure previously developed for children aged 8–11 years was revised iteratively in conjunction with a parent advisory group (comprising five parents of children and young people with and without intellectual disability) and children and young people with intellectual disability. The final patient-reported experience measure was tested in children's inpatient wards at seven hospitals in England over a 3-month period.

Results

Parents suggested a need for a single patient-reported experience measure for all children with intellectual disability which contained simpler language, fewer questions and response options, and images to illustrate each question. The final patient-reported experience measure had 22 questions, each with a corresponding image, and a free text box in which children could add anything further. Questions addressed environment, people, care and treatment and safety.

During testing at seven children's hospitals, 52 children and young people with intellectual disability (4–18 years) and 76 children without intellectual disability (4–7 years), all of whom received inpatient care, completed the patient-reported experience measure. Two percent of data were missing; in 16 instances respondents either ticked two responses or placed a tick between two response categories. Half the respondents added comments and/or drew a picture.

Conclusion

The development of a patient-reported experience measure for children and young people with intellectual disability provides a previously unavailable opportunity for them to report on their experiences of inpatient care and have their voices heard. Future work to extend testing to a wider group is underway and will enable us to clarify whether one patient-reported experience measure is valid and reliable for all children and young people with intellectual disability.

Patient or Public Contribution

A parent advisory group, comprising parents/carers of young people with or without a learning disability, advised on all aspects of the wider study design and specifically on revisions to the measure reported in this manuscript. The parent advisory group met twice a year during the study with email contact between meetings for specific requests and study updates. Representatives of the advisory group also attended the study steering group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被遗忘的声音:使智障儿童和青少年能够表达他们对住院经历的看法
让患者对他们的医疗保健体验提供反馈的重要性被广泛接受,但很少有适当的措施使儿童和青少年,特别是那些有智力残疾或年龄较小的儿童直接提供反馈。我们的主要目的是为使用住院医院服务的智力残疾儿童和青少年制定和测试患者报告的体验措施。第二个目的是在4-7岁无智力残疾的幼儿中测试这些措施。方法与家长咨询小组(包括有或无智障儿童和青少年的5名家长)以及智障儿童和青少年的家长一起,反复修订先前为8-11岁儿童制定的住院患者报告体验量表。最后的病人报告的经验测量是在英国七家医院的儿童住院病房进行了为期三个月的测试。结果家长建议对所有智力障碍儿童采用单一的患者报告体验量表,该量表包含更简单的语言,更少的问题和回答选项,以及每个问题的图像说明。最终的病人报告体验测试有22个问题,每个问题都有相应的图像,还有一个免费的文本框,孩子们可以在其中添加任何进一步的内容。问题涉及环境、人员、护理和治疗以及安全。在7家儿童医院进行的测试中,52名智力残疾儿童和青少年(4-18岁)和76名无智力残疾儿童(4-7岁)都接受了住院治疗,他们完成了患者报告的经历测量。2%的数据丢失;在16个案例中,受访者要么在两个回答上打勾,要么在两个回答类别之间打勾。一半的受访者添加了评论和/或画了一幅画。为智障儿童和青少年制定患者报告体验量表,为他们提供了一个以前无法获得的机会,让他们报告他们的住院护理经历,并让他们的声音被听到。将测试扩展到更广泛的群体的未来工作正在进行中,这将使我们能够澄清一种患者报告的经验测量是否对所有患有智力残疾的儿童和青少年有效和可靠。由有或没有学习障碍的年轻人的父母/照顾者组成的家长咨询小组,对更广泛的研究设计的各个方面提出建议,特别是对本文中报告的测量方法的修订。在研究期间,家长咨询小组每年召开两次会议,会议之间通过电子邮件联系,以了解具体要求和研究进展。咨询小组的代表也出席了研究指导小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
A Pre–Post Study of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of a Co-Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Suicide Prevention App for International Students Symptom Management in Chronic Heart Failure: Strategies and Behaviours From Patients’ Perspectives—A Scoping Review Addressing Medical Deserts in Europe: Lessons From a Comparative Analysis. Psychosocial Impact of Breast Density Notification Through Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study. One Eye Open: Reflections on Embedding Lived Experience in Sleep, Circadian Rhythms, and Mood Disorder Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1