{"title":"Clients' Reasons for Dropping Out of Therapy: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Jesse B. Homan, Maria M. Talbott, Mic Holliday","doi":"10.1002/capr.12882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>There has been limited research on therapy attrition from the perspective of clients who terminate. This qualitative study addresses the question, why do clients choose to terminate therapy prematurely?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve participants who had chosen to end in-person individual therapy were interviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The most common reason for terminating was experiencing invalidation from the therapist, including not feeling heard, feeling dismissed and judged and not feeling valued. Another type of invalidation experienced was therapists' microaggressions on client identities of race, culture and sexual orientation. Inadequate problem-solving in therapy, through oversimplification of problem-solving or not receiving guidance for change, was another common reason for dropout.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the perspectives of clients who have been dissatisfied with therapy is useful for identifying therapist behaviours that can cause ruptures. Clinicians can learn from clients' negative experiences in therapy in order to improve clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
There has been limited research on therapy attrition from the perspective of clients who terminate. This qualitative study addresses the question, why do clients choose to terminate therapy prematurely?
Method
Twelve participants who had chosen to end in-person individual therapy were interviewed.
Findings
The most common reason for terminating was experiencing invalidation from the therapist, including not feeling heard, feeling dismissed and judged and not feeling valued. Another type of invalidation experienced was therapists' microaggressions on client identities of race, culture and sexual orientation. Inadequate problem-solving in therapy, through oversimplification of problem-solving or not receiving guidance for change, was another common reason for dropout.
Discussion
Understanding the perspectives of clients who have been dissatisfied with therapy is useful for identifying therapist behaviours that can cause ruptures. Clinicians can learn from clients' negative experiences in therapy in order to improve clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.