Real meat shows good performance in maintaining colonic barrier function at a recommended amount of intake in mice

IF 7.4 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food frontiers Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1002/fft2.497
Yunting Xie, Linlin Cai, Isaiah Henry Ibeogu, Guanghong Zhou, Chunbao Li
{"title":"Real meat shows good performance in maintaining colonic barrier function at a recommended amount of intake in mice","authors":"Yunting Xie,&nbsp;Linlin Cai,&nbsp;Isaiah Henry Ibeogu,&nbsp;Guanghong Zhou,&nbsp;Chunbao Li","doi":"10.1002/fft2.497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of real meat and plant-based meat analogs on intestinal barrier function. Methods including PacBio sequencing, HPLC, histological observation, western blotting, and RT-qPCR were jointly applied. The results indicated that the 20-day intake of real meat and plant-based meat analogs did not induce pathological changes in the colon of mice. However, when the feeding period was extended to 68 days, inflammatory infiltration was observed in the colon tissue of mice fed plant-based meat analogs. In contrast, the intake of real meat for 68 days performed better in maintaining colonic barrier function by reducing cell apoptosis, increasing the number of goblet cells and mucin secretion, and upregulating the expression of tight junction proteins. High-throughput sequencing revealed that the intake of real meat significantly altered the composition of the gut microbiota, reducing pro-inflammatory bacteria (such as <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Desulfovibrio</i>, or <i>Colidextribacter</i>) or pathogenic bacteria (such as <i>Mucispirillum</i> and <i>Helicobacter</i>) while increasing beneficial bacteria (such as <i>Lactobacillus</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, or <i>Roseburia</i>). Additionally, the consumption of real meat markedly decreased protein fermentation in the colon, leading to lower levels of cadaverine, putrescine, and spermine. These changes associated with real meat consumption reduced the activation of the pro-inflammatory pathway (lipopolysaccharide/Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappa B), ultimately maintaining colonic homeostasis in mice. Collectively, the findings suggest that the proper intake of real meat is more beneficial for colon health in mice compared to plant-based meat analogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":"6 1","pages":"300-315"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of real meat and plant-based meat analogs on intestinal barrier function. Methods including PacBio sequencing, HPLC, histological observation, western blotting, and RT-qPCR were jointly applied. The results indicated that the 20-day intake of real meat and plant-based meat analogs did not induce pathological changes in the colon of mice. However, when the feeding period was extended to 68 days, inflammatory infiltration was observed in the colon tissue of mice fed plant-based meat analogs. In contrast, the intake of real meat for 68 days performed better in maintaining colonic barrier function by reducing cell apoptosis, increasing the number of goblet cells and mucin secretion, and upregulating the expression of tight junction proteins. High-throughput sequencing revealed that the intake of real meat significantly altered the composition of the gut microbiota, reducing pro-inflammatory bacteria (such as Bacteroides, Desulfovibrio, or Colidextribacter) or pathogenic bacteria (such as Mucispirillum and Helicobacter) while increasing beneficial bacteria (such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, or Roseburia). Additionally, the consumption of real meat markedly decreased protein fermentation in the colon, leading to lower levels of cadaverine, putrescine, and spermine. These changes associated with real meat consumption reduced the activation of the pro-inflammatory pathway (lipopolysaccharide/Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappa B), ultimately maintaining colonic homeostasis in mice. Collectively, the findings suggest that the proper intake of real meat is more beneficial for colon health in mice compared to plant-based meat analogs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “The Algal Polysaccharide Ulvan Suppresses Growth of Hepatoma Cells” RS4 Type Resistant Starch Improves Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Mice by Interacting With Lactobacillus johnsonii Dynamic Residue Behavior and Risk Assessment of Thiamethoxam With Its Metabolite From Tea Production to Consumption Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Intake and Its Association With Health Status Among Vegetarians of the UK Biobank Volunteer Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1