Do invasive predators pose a predation risk to roosting shorebirds? Fecal DNA and camera trap analysis

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/jwmg.22694
Louise A. Williams, Samuel Dupré, Michael Stat, Matt W. Hayward, Christophe Tourenq, Andrea S. Griffin
{"title":"Do invasive predators pose a predation risk to roosting shorebirds? Fecal DNA and camera trap analysis","authors":"Louise A. Williams,&nbsp;Samuel Dupré,&nbsp;Michael Stat,&nbsp;Matt W. Hayward,&nbsp;Christophe Tourenq,&nbsp;Andrea S. Griffin","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shorebird populations have experienced dramatic population declines worldwide. Reasons for these declines are varied, but one largely understudied threat at migratory shorebird non-breeding grounds is predation by introduced predators. High-tide roosting shorebirds may be vulnerable to ground predation, as they roost in a spatially clumped and temporally predictable manner in areas easily accessible to ground predators. We measured predation risk by the introduced red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) at high-tide roosts within 2 internationally important shorebird estuaries in New South Wales, Australia, during a time when non-breeding shorebird numbers were at their annual peak, using a combination of camera trapping and environmental DNA (eDNA). Foxes were present at all study sites and were seen most frequently at sites encompassing the 2 largest high-tide roosts within the study estuaries, and least frequently nearest the roosts. Metabarcoding identified a broad range of avian taxa in fox scats collected at roosts, including ground-dwelling birds, native waterbirds, and introduced pigeons and doves, but no shorebird species. Bird prevalence in fox scats reached levels that far exceeded those reported in prior studies. Future studies should examine whether red foxes present a non-lethal, rather than lethal, predation threat to high-tide roosting shorebirds when feeding on other co-occurring food sources, potentially inducing energetically costly predator avoidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shorebird populations have experienced dramatic population declines worldwide. Reasons for these declines are varied, but one largely understudied threat at migratory shorebird non-breeding grounds is predation by introduced predators. High-tide roosting shorebirds may be vulnerable to ground predation, as they roost in a spatially clumped and temporally predictable manner in areas easily accessible to ground predators. We measured predation risk by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) at high-tide roosts within 2 internationally important shorebird estuaries in New South Wales, Australia, during a time when non-breeding shorebird numbers were at their annual peak, using a combination of camera trapping and environmental DNA (eDNA). Foxes were present at all study sites and were seen most frequently at sites encompassing the 2 largest high-tide roosts within the study estuaries, and least frequently nearest the roosts. Metabarcoding identified a broad range of avian taxa in fox scats collected at roosts, including ground-dwelling birds, native waterbirds, and introduced pigeons and doves, but no shorebird species. Bird prevalence in fox scats reached levels that far exceeded those reported in prior studies. Future studies should examine whether red foxes present a non-lethal, rather than lethal, predation threat to high-tide roosting shorebirds when feeding on other co-occurring food sources, potentially inducing energetically costly predator avoidance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入侵掠食者会对栖息的滨鸟构成捕食风险吗?粪便DNA和相机陷阱分析
在世界范围内,滨鸟的数量急剧下降。这些减少的原因是多种多样的,但在迁徙的滨鸟非繁殖地,一个主要未被充分研究的威胁是外来掠食者的捕食。涨潮时栖息的滨鸟可能很容易受到地面捕食者的攻击,因为它们以一种空间聚集和时间可预测的方式栖息在地面捕食者容易到达的地区。在非繁殖滨鸟数量达到年度高峰的时候,我们在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的两个国际重要滨鸟河口的涨潮栖息地引入了红狐(Vulpes Vulpes),采用相机诱捕和环境DNA (eDNA)相结合的方法测量了它们的捕食风险。狐狸出现在所有的研究地点,最常出现在研究河口内2个最大的高潮栖息地附近,最不常出现在离栖息地最近的地方。元条形码技术在收集的狐粪中发现了广泛的鸟类分类群,包括陆鸟、本地水鸟和引进的鸽子和鸽子,但没有发现滨鸟。狐粪中的鸟类流行率达到了远远超过先前研究报告的水平。未来的研究应该检查红狐在以其他共同发生的食物来源为食时,是否会对涨潮时栖息的滨鸟构成非致命的捕食威胁,而不是致命的捕食威胁,可能会导致能量昂贵的捕食者回避。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of dedicated revenue scale and diversity among U.S. state fish and wildlife agencies Prioritizing efficient use of resources: Simple changes to monitoring combat inefficient capture-recapture of vulnerable skinks Indirect effects of fast-growing urban development on wildlife in a coastal protected area of Costa Rica Writing in the Biological Sciences: A Comprehensive Resource for Scientific Communication (5th edition) By Angelika H. Hofmann, New York, New York: Oxford University Press. 2024. pp. 408. $49.99 (paperback). ISBN 978-0-1976-6540-4 Evaluating the impact of hunter access and harvest regulations on elk movement and resource selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1