Leveraging Generative AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges Addressed in University Guidelines

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1111/ejed.12891
Sonja Christ-Brendemühl
{"title":"Leveraging Generative AI in Higher Education: An Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges Addressed in University Guidelines","authors":"Sonja Christ-Brendemühl","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is seen as a catalyst for a new learning and examination culture in higher education, it urges universities to reinvent themselves and to adapt to these changes effectively. By analysing the content of 67 university guidelines on generative AI, this study investigates how universities in Germany position themselves towards the rise of generative AI. Findings reveal that a majority of university guidelines explicitly permit both university lecturers and students to engage with generative AI, emphasising the importance of building AI literacy among both groups and preparing students for changing demands in the world of work. Importantly, 56.7% of university guidelines posit that the opportunities of generative AI for higher education outweigh the risks, underscoring the potential transformative impact on teaching and research. In addition, the results of a workshop with 25 faculty members were scrutinised to deepen and specify the findings of the content analysis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is seen as a catalyst for a new learning and examination culture in higher education, it urges universities to reinvent themselves and to adapt to these changes effectively. By analysing the content of 67 university guidelines on generative AI, this study investigates how universities in Germany position themselves towards the rise of generative AI. Findings reveal that a majority of university guidelines explicitly permit both university lecturers and students to engage with generative AI, emphasising the importance of building AI literacy among both groups and preparing students for changing demands in the world of work. Importantly, 56.7% of university guidelines posit that the opportunities of generative AI for higher education outweigh the risks, underscoring the potential transformative impact on teaching and research. In addition, the results of a workshop with 25 faculty members were scrutinised to deepen and specify the findings of the content analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高等教育中利用生成式人工智能:对大学指导方针中提出的机遇和挑战的分析
由于生成式人工智能(AI)被视为高等教育中新的学习和考试文化的催化剂,它敦促大学重塑自我,并有效地适应这些变化。通过分析67所大学关于生成人工智能的指导方针的内容,本研究调查了德国的大学如何对生成人工智能的兴起进行定位。研究结果显示,大多数大学指导方针明确允许大学讲师和学生参与生成式人工智能,强调在这两个群体中培养人工智能素养的重要性,并为学生应对工作世界不断变化的需求做好准备。重要的是,56.7%的大学指导方针认为,生成式人工智能对高等教育的机会大于风险,强调了对教学和研究的潜在变革性影响。此外,还审查了25名教员参加的讲习班的结果,以深化和具体说明内容分析的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Correction to ‘Actualization of Interdisciplinary Integration at Mathematics Lessons’ Correction to ‘Actualization of Interdisciplinary Integration at Mathematics Lessons’ Perceived Principal Leadership and Work Engagement Among Chinese Primary School Teachers: The Roles of Occupational Stress and Job Crafting Perceived Principal Leadership and Work Engagement Among Chinese Primary School Teachers: The Roles of Occupational Stress and Job Crafting Digital Pedagogies in Music Education: Exploring Technology-Mediated Strategies for Creative Skill Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1