Jeff A. Alvarez, Jesse H. Schmieg, Jeffery T. Wilcox
{"title":"Diurnal versus nocturnal surveys for foothill yellow-legged frogs","authors":"Jeff A. Alvarez, Jesse H. Schmieg, Jeffery T. Wilcox","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foothill yellow-legged frogs (<i>Rana boylii</i>) are a declining species, and methodologies for assessing population occupancy have been associated with only diurnal work on the species. Diurnal visual encounter surveys are typically used to determine presence within suitable habitat; however, studies of ecologically similar species indicate a potential advantage of nocturnal surveys. At 5 sites in 4 counties in California, USA, we compared diurnal and nocturnal surveys (<i>n</i> = 53 paired surveys) for foothill yellow-legged frogs, conducted 2016-2023, to determine the value of each survey period. Generally, occupancy probabilities increased 1–22 times, detection probabilities 1–69 times, and estimated abundances 3–12 times during nocturnal versus diurnal surveys. Associated standard errors were also lower in nocturnal versus diurnal surveys. However, we noted 2 locations where diurnal surveys yielded higher detection probability or higher estimates densities compared to nocturnal surveys. We suggest that both diurnal and nocturnal surveys be required when assessing occupancy of foothill yellow-legged frogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii) are a declining species, and methodologies for assessing population occupancy have been associated with only diurnal work on the species. Diurnal visual encounter surveys are typically used to determine presence within suitable habitat; however, studies of ecologically similar species indicate a potential advantage of nocturnal surveys. At 5 sites in 4 counties in California, USA, we compared diurnal and nocturnal surveys (n = 53 paired surveys) for foothill yellow-legged frogs, conducted 2016-2023, to determine the value of each survey period. Generally, occupancy probabilities increased 1–22 times, detection probabilities 1–69 times, and estimated abundances 3–12 times during nocturnal versus diurnal surveys. Associated standard errors were also lower in nocturnal versus diurnal surveys. However, we noted 2 locations where diurnal surveys yielded higher detection probability or higher estimates densities compared to nocturnal surveys. We suggest that both diurnal and nocturnal surveys be required when assessing occupancy of foothill yellow-legged frogs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.