Predicting the Treatment Response of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Using Machine Learning Techniques and EEG Functional Connectivity Features

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1155/da/9340993
Fanglan Wang, Zifan You, Tingkai Zhang, Kai Xu, Liangliang Wang, Jingqi He, Jinsong Tang
{"title":"Predicting the Treatment Response of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Using Machine Learning Techniques and EEG Functional Connectivity Features","authors":"Fanglan Wang,&nbsp;Zifan You,&nbsp;Tingkai Zhang,&nbsp;Kai Xu,&nbsp;Liangliang Wang,&nbsp;Jingqi He,&nbsp;Jinsong Tang","doi":"10.1155/da/9340993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Escitalopram and sertraline are first-line medications for treating depression. They belong to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and are widely used due to their effectiveness and fewer side effects. However, despite the significant efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline, there is a large variation among individuals. Therefore, predicting symptom improvement based on the baseline period is crucial.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> In this study, we conducted functional connectivity (FC) analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data during resting-state with eyes closed, resting-state with eyes open, watching neutral videos, negative videos, and comedy videos for 30 untreated depression patients over 2 weeks. Each modality yielded 18 EEG FC features. Based on the treatment response at 8 weeks, patients were divided into treatment-effective and treatment-ineffective groups. The dataset was randomly split into a 75% training set and a 25% independent test set. Feature selection was performed on these FC features in the training set, and the selected features were used to classify the effective and ineffective groups using the support vector machine (SVM) machine learning algorithm. Fivefold cross-validation was conducted on the training set to obtain validation results, followed by testing on the test set. The Spearman’s correlation method was used to analyze the correlation between each EEG feature value and the reduction rate of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) scores from baseline to 8 weeks, with Bonferroni correction applied.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The study found that out of all modalities, 33 features achieved classification accuracies of over 95% on the validation set, and two features achieved classification accuracies of over 85% on the independent test set. A total of 58 feature values were found to be correlated with the reduction rate of HAMD-17 scores from baseline to 8 weeks.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The findings from this research suggest that EEG FC features at baseline can be used to differentiate between effective and ineffective groups with high accuracy using machine learning models. Multiple feature values and HAMD-17 scores were found to be correlated with the reduction rate of HAMD-17 scores from baseline to 8 weeks, and these correlated feature values can be used to predict treatment efficacy.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05775809</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/9340993","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/9340993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Escitalopram and sertraline are first-line medications for treating depression. They belong to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and are widely used due to their effectiveness and fewer side effects. However, despite the significant efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline, there is a large variation among individuals. Therefore, predicting symptom improvement based on the baseline period is crucial.

Methods: In this study, we conducted functional connectivity (FC) analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data during resting-state with eyes closed, resting-state with eyes open, watching neutral videos, negative videos, and comedy videos for 30 untreated depression patients over 2 weeks. Each modality yielded 18 EEG FC features. Based on the treatment response at 8 weeks, patients were divided into treatment-effective and treatment-ineffective groups. The dataset was randomly split into a 75% training set and a 25% independent test set. Feature selection was performed on these FC features in the training set, and the selected features were used to classify the effective and ineffective groups using the support vector machine (SVM) machine learning algorithm. Fivefold cross-validation was conducted on the training set to obtain validation results, followed by testing on the test set. The Spearman’s correlation method was used to analyze the correlation between each EEG feature value and the reduction rate of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) scores from baseline to 8 weeks, with Bonferroni correction applied.

Results: The study found that out of all modalities, 33 features achieved classification accuracies of over 95% on the validation set, and two features achieved classification accuracies of over 85% on the independent test set. A total of 58 feature values were found to be correlated with the reduction rate of HAMD-17 scores from baseline to 8 weeks.

Conclusions: The findings from this research suggest that EEG FC features at baseline can be used to differentiate between effective and ineffective groups with high accuracy using machine learning models. Multiple feature values and HAMD-17 scores were found to be correlated with the reduction rate of HAMD-17 scores from baseline to 8 weeks, and these correlated feature values can be used to predict treatment efficacy.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05775809

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
Drift-Diffusion Modeling of Attentional Shifting During Frustration: Associations With State Frustration and Trait Irritability Intra- and Extracellular White Matter Micromorphology Predict the Antidepressant Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Identification of Subthreshold Depression Based on fNIRS–VFT Functional Connectivity: A Machine Learning Approach Global Scientific Trends on Anxiety Disorders in the Early Twenty-First Century: A Data-Driven Bibliometric Analysis Artificial Intelligence–Based Psychotherapeutic Intervention on Psychological Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1