Does exposure to zinc, methomyl and perfluorooctanoic acid alter feeding behaviour on MUG® in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum?

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1093/etojnl/vgaf035
A G E Mathiron, L Bertin, V Brosselin, N Delorme, M Duny, O Geffard, G Jubeaux
{"title":"Does exposure to zinc, methomyl and perfluorooctanoic acid alter feeding behaviour on MUG® in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum?","authors":"A G E Mathiron, L Bertin, V Brosselin, N Delorme, M Duny, O Geffard, G Jubeaux","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feeding rate alteration is one of the first observed responses when animals are exposed to toxic stress and recognized as relevant tool for studying chemical compounds toxicity. However, food substrate that are currently used for ecotoxicity tests are not always easily available compared to referenced products. Using the European freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum, we here proposed for ecotoxicity tests a standardized food substrate fabricated with referenced ingredients: the MUG® (Meal Unit for Gammarid). To investigate the suitability of using MUG® to study behavioural response of amphipods to toxic stress, we explored in laboratory-controlled conditions whether three chemical compounds belonging to different families of contaminants (zinc (Zn): metal; methomyl (MT): insecticide; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): Per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)) could affect gammarids feeding rates on MUG®. First, we explored the effects of 7-day exposure to different concentrations of each contaminant alone. While PFOA did not affect feeding rate, zinc induced feeding behaviour on MUG® at lower concentration but inhibited food consumption at higher ones, whereas methomyl decreased feeding rate with increased concentration. Then, we explored effects when gammarids were exposed during 7 days to mixtures of molecules in pairs. No effect of mixtures was observed on MUG® consumption compared to control group. Observed effects of binary mixtures were also compared to predicted values based on additive effects of contaminants. Both Zn/MT and Zn/PFOA mixtures inhibited feeding behaviour compared to predictions, resulting in feeding rate values similar to control ones. Overall, our study supports that MUG® represent a promising standardized food substrate for evaluating substances effects on amphipods behaviour during laboratory ecotoxicological bioassays.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feeding rate alteration is one of the first observed responses when animals are exposed to toxic stress and recognized as relevant tool for studying chemical compounds toxicity. However, food substrate that are currently used for ecotoxicity tests are not always easily available compared to referenced products. Using the European freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum, we here proposed for ecotoxicity tests a standardized food substrate fabricated with referenced ingredients: the MUG® (Meal Unit for Gammarid). To investigate the suitability of using MUG® to study behavioural response of amphipods to toxic stress, we explored in laboratory-controlled conditions whether three chemical compounds belonging to different families of contaminants (zinc (Zn): metal; methomyl (MT): insecticide; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): Per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)) could affect gammarids feeding rates on MUG®. First, we explored the effects of 7-day exposure to different concentrations of each contaminant alone. While PFOA did not affect feeding rate, zinc induced feeding behaviour on MUG® at lower concentration but inhibited food consumption at higher ones, whereas methomyl decreased feeding rate with increased concentration. Then, we explored effects when gammarids were exposed during 7 days to mixtures of molecules in pairs. No effect of mixtures was observed on MUG® consumption compared to control group. Observed effects of binary mixtures were also compared to predicted values based on additive effects of contaminants. Both Zn/MT and Zn/PFOA mixtures inhibited feeding behaviour compared to predictions, resulting in feeding rate values similar to control ones. Overall, our study supports that MUG® represent a promising standardized food substrate for evaluating substances effects on amphipods behaviour during laboratory ecotoxicological bioassays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当动物受到毒性压力时,摄食率的改变是最先观察到的反应之一,也被认为是研究化合物毒性的相关工具。然而,与参考产品相比,目前用于生态毒性试验的食物基质并不总是很容易获得。在此,我们以欧洲淡水两足类(Gammarus fossarum)为研究对象,提出了一种使用参考成分制作的标准化食物基质:MUG®(Meal Unit for Gammarid),用于生态毒性试验。为了研究 MUG® 是否适用于研究片脚类动物对毒性应激的行为反应,我们在实验室控制条件下探讨了属于不同污染物家族的三种化合物(锌(Zn):金属;灭多威(MT):杀虫剂;全氟辛酸(PFOA):全氟辛烷磺酸)是否适用于片脚类动物:全氟辛酸(PFAS))可能会影响伽马类在 MUG® 上的摄食率。首先,我们研究了单独暴露于不同浓度的污染物 7 天的影响。全氟辛烷磺酸不会影响摄食率,而锌在较低浓度下会诱导在 MUG® 上的摄食行为,但在较高浓度下会抑制食物消耗,而甲氧苄啶则会随着浓度的增加而降低摄食率。然后,我们研究了伽马类在 7 天内接触成对分子混合物时受到的影响。与对照组相比,没有观察到混合物对 MUG® 消费量的影响。观察到的二元混合物的影响还与基于污染物相加效应的预测值进行了比较。与预测值相比,Zn/MT 和 Zn/PFOA 混合物都会抑制摄食行为,导致摄食率与对照组相似。总之,我们的研究证明,在实验室生态毒理学生物测定中,MUG® 是一种很有前途的标准化食物基质,可用于评估物质对片脚类动物行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
期刊最新文献
Critical review of chronic toxicity testing approaches with the saltwater mysid (Americamysis bahia) used in pesticide registration. Does exposure to zinc, methomyl and perfluorooctanoic acid alter feeding behaviour on MUG® in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum? Estrogenic activity of alkylcyclohexanones and alkylcyclohexanols in rainbow trout estrogen receptor binding and liver slices Vtg mRNA expression assays. ASPIS Definition of New Approach Methodologies. Review of pretreatment and analytical methods for environmental endocrine disruptors: Phthalates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1