A G E Mathiron, L Bertin, V Brosselin, N Delorme, M Duny, O Geffard, G Jubeaux
{"title":"Does exposure to zinc, methomyl and perfluorooctanoic acid alter feeding behaviour on MUG® in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum?","authors":"A G E Mathiron, L Bertin, V Brosselin, N Delorme, M Duny, O Geffard, G Jubeaux","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feeding rate alteration is one of the first observed responses when animals are exposed to toxic stress and recognized as relevant tool for studying chemical compounds toxicity. However, food substrate that are currently used for ecotoxicity tests are not always easily available compared to referenced products. Using the European freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum, we here proposed for ecotoxicity tests a standardized food substrate fabricated with referenced ingredients: the MUG® (Meal Unit for Gammarid). To investigate the suitability of using MUG® to study behavioural response of amphipods to toxic stress, we explored in laboratory-controlled conditions whether three chemical compounds belonging to different families of contaminants (zinc (Zn): metal; methomyl (MT): insecticide; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): Per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)) could affect gammarids feeding rates on MUG®. First, we explored the effects of 7-day exposure to different concentrations of each contaminant alone. While PFOA did not affect feeding rate, zinc induced feeding behaviour on MUG® at lower concentration but inhibited food consumption at higher ones, whereas methomyl decreased feeding rate with increased concentration. Then, we explored effects when gammarids were exposed during 7 days to mixtures of molecules in pairs. No effect of mixtures was observed on MUG® consumption compared to control group. Observed effects of binary mixtures were also compared to predicted values based on additive effects of contaminants. Both Zn/MT and Zn/PFOA mixtures inhibited feeding behaviour compared to predictions, resulting in feeding rate values similar to control ones. Overall, our study supports that MUG® represent a promising standardized food substrate for evaluating substances effects on amphipods behaviour during laboratory ecotoxicological bioassays.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Feeding rate alteration is one of the first observed responses when animals are exposed to toxic stress and recognized as relevant tool for studying chemical compounds toxicity. However, food substrate that are currently used for ecotoxicity tests are not always easily available compared to referenced products. Using the European freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum, we here proposed for ecotoxicity tests a standardized food substrate fabricated with referenced ingredients: the MUG® (Meal Unit for Gammarid). To investigate the suitability of using MUG® to study behavioural response of amphipods to toxic stress, we explored in laboratory-controlled conditions whether three chemical compounds belonging to different families of contaminants (zinc (Zn): metal; methomyl (MT): insecticide; perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): Per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)) could affect gammarids feeding rates on MUG®. First, we explored the effects of 7-day exposure to different concentrations of each contaminant alone. While PFOA did not affect feeding rate, zinc induced feeding behaviour on MUG® at lower concentration but inhibited food consumption at higher ones, whereas methomyl decreased feeding rate with increased concentration. Then, we explored effects when gammarids were exposed during 7 days to mixtures of molecules in pairs. No effect of mixtures was observed on MUG® consumption compared to control group. Observed effects of binary mixtures were also compared to predicted values based on additive effects of contaminants. Both Zn/MT and Zn/PFOA mixtures inhibited feeding behaviour compared to predictions, resulting in feeding rate values similar to control ones. Overall, our study supports that MUG® represent a promising standardized food substrate for evaluating substances effects on amphipods behaviour during laboratory ecotoxicological bioassays.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.