Dynamic Relations Between Negative News Media Experiences and Mental Distress? Examining Transactional Effects During Times of Health Crises.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2025.2457557
Sophia Schaller, Christina Schumann, Dorothee Arlt
{"title":"Dynamic Relations Between Negative News Media Experiences and Mental Distress? Examining Transactional Effects During Times of Health Crises.","authors":"Sophia Schaller, Christina Schumann, Dorothee Arlt","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2457557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study concentrates on individual's media experiences during public health crises - especially media experiences of fear and issue fatigue regarding COVID-19 news media coverage - and their relationship to mental distress. Specifically, we aim to examine potential transactional effects and ask whether media experiences are only a cause or also a consequence of mental distress throughout a health crisis. Utilizing a three-wave panel survey of German citizens (<i>n</i>  = 856), the study employs two random intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs). RI-CLPMs distinguish stable between-person differences from temporal within-person changes, facilitating a nuanced understanding of transactional dynamics. Our study shows distinct relationships between media experiences and mental distress. While the respondents' experiences of issue fatigue led to subsequent changes in their depressive symptoms, which, in turn, influenced subsequent changes in their issue fatigue at the within-person level, media-related fear experience was strongly associated with depressive symptoms only at the between-person level. Thus, our findings demonstrate a causal transactional relationship between media experiences of issue fatigue and mental distress that evolves over time. Media experiences of fear, however, appear to be a consequence of trait-like differences between individuals rather than a result of intraindividual change.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2457557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study concentrates on individual's media experiences during public health crises - especially media experiences of fear and issue fatigue regarding COVID-19 news media coverage - and their relationship to mental distress. Specifically, we aim to examine potential transactional effects and ask whether media experiences are only a cause or also a consequence of mental distress throughout a health crisis. Utilizing a three-wave panel survey of German citizens (n  = 856), the study employs two random intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs). RI-CLPMs distinguish stable between-person differences from temporal within-person changes, facilitating a nuanced understanding of transactional dynamics. Our study shows distinct relationships between media experiences and mental distress. While the respondents' experiences of issue fatigue led to subsequent changes in their depressive symptoms, which, in turn, influenced subsequent changes in their issue fatigue at the within-person level, media-related fear experience was strongly associated with depressive symptoms only at the between-person level. Thus, our findings demonstrate a causal transactional relationship between media experiences of issue fatigue and mental distress that evolves over time. Media experiences of fear, however, appear to be a consequence of trait-like differences between individuals rather than a result of intraindividual change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Thinking Outside of Yourself: The Potential of Awe in Mitigating Psychological Reactance Via Inspiring Self-Transcendence. In Whom We Trust: The Effect of Trust, Subjective Norms, and Socioeconomic Status on Attitudes and COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions. "Sharing Is Caring Even When It's Wrong": The Factors Influencing Health Misinformation Sharing and Relational Correction Among Chinese Older Adults from a Cultural Perspective. An Art Exhibition on Creative Activities of Family Members of Persons with Dementia as an Effective Tool for Science Communication: A Qualitative Assessment Study. Dynamic Relations Between Negative News Media Experiences and Mental Distress? Examining Transactional Effects During Times of Health Crises.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1