Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101605
Jeff Shi MD , Kevin Salomon MD , Victor Shen BS , Andrew Moore MD , John T. Wilson MD , Brian Palumbo MD
{"title":"Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?","authors":"Jeff Shi MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Salomon MD ,&nbsp;Victor Shen BS ,&nbsp;Andrew Moore MD ,&nbsp;John T. Wilson MD ,&nbsp;Brian Palumbo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Conventional single-tapered, total hip arthroplasty stems achieve fixation namely through coronal, metaphyseal fit. Triple taper stems have a sagittal taper to optimize fixation in the antero-posterior (AP) plane as well; however, limited guidance exists on appropriate bone preparation. Often, similar preparation techniques are used despite geometric differences which may lead to underpreparation. We’ve defined a novel technique in which a small portion of posterior femoral neck and cancellous bone is removed to permit preparation collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis. We hypothesize this will optimize stem fit and stability compared to conventional techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective review of 38 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty cases performed by a single surgeon. In each case, broach preparation was initially performed through the center of the femoral neck as although it was a single-tapered stem. Once tactile sensation of adequate fit was achieved, fluoroscopic images were taken to document AP and mediolateral fit, and stem size was recorded. Then that broach was removed, and a standardized one-third of the posterior femoral neck and posterior cancellous bone was removed, permitting broaches to prepare the femur collinear to the femoral diaphyseal sagittal axis— triple-tapered preparation (TTP). Outcomes included change in stem size from initial broach trial to final stem selection and radiographic stem fill on AP and lateral views.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median single-tapered preparation broach size was 8 (range, 5-12) and final stem size after TTP was 11 (range, 6-13). The TTP overall mean percent metaphyseal fill was 74 ± 6% in the AP view and 71 ± 5% in the lateral view, both significantly higher than single-tapered preparation which was 67 ± 7% and 65 ± 7%, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). No fractures or loosening occurred in this series.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preparation of triple-tapered stems collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis improves stem size, fit, and fill.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Conventional single-tapered, total hip arthroplasty stems achieve fixation namely through coronal, metaphyseal fit. Triple taper stems have a sagittal taper to optimize fixation in the antero-posterior (AP) plane as well; however, limited guidance exists on appropriate bone preparation. Often, similar preparation techniques are used despite geometric differences which may lead to underpreparation. We’ve defined a novel technique in which a small portion of posterior femoral neck and cancellous bone is removed to permit preparation collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis. We hypothesize this will optimize stem fit and stability compared to conventional techniques.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 38 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty cases performed by a single surgeon. In each case, broach preparation was initially performed through the center of the femoral neck as although it was a single-tapered stem. Once tactile sensation of adequate fit was achieved, fluoroscopic images were taken to document AP and mediolateral fit, and stem size was recorded. Then that broach was removed, and a standardized one-third of the posterior femoral neck and posterior cancellous bone was removed, permitting broaches to prepare the femur collinear to the femoral diaphyseal sagittal axis— triple-tapered preparation (TTP). Outcomes included change in stem size from initial broach trial to final stem selection and radiographic stem fill on AP and lateral views.

Results

Median single-tapered preparation broach size was 8 (range, 5-12) and final stem size after TTP was 11 (range, 6-13). The TTP overall mean percent metaphyseal fill was 74 ± 6% in the AP view and 71 ± 5% in the lateral view, both significantly higher than single-tapered preparation which was 67 ± 7% and 65 ± 7%, respectively (P < .001). No fractures or loosening occurred in this series.

Conclusions

Preparation of triple-tapered stems collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis improves stem size, fit, and fill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三锥形柄的最佳骨准备:矢状锥形是否影响最佳股骨大小?
背景:传统的单锥形全髋关节置换术柄通过冠状、干骺端配合实现固定。三锥度柄具有矢状锥度,以优化前后平面的固定;然而,关于适当的骨准备的指导是有限的。通常,尽管几何差异可能导致制备不足,但仍使用类似的制备技术。我们定义了一种新技术,其中一小部分股骨后颈和松质骨被移除,以便与骨干矢状股轴共线准备。我们假设与传统技术相比,这将优化阀杆配合和稳定性。方法:回顾性分析38例由同一外科医生进行的无骨水泥全髋关节置换术。在每个病例中,拉刀准备最初都是通过股骨颈中心进行的,尽管它是一个单锥形管。一旦达到适当的贴合触觉,透视图像记录AP和中外侧贴合,并记录茎的大小。然后取出该拉针,取出标准的股骨后颈和后松质骨的三分之一,允许拉针准备股骨与股骨干矢状轴共线-三锥形准备(TTP)。结果包括从最初的拉刀试验到最终的茎选择的茎尺寸的变化,以及在正位和侧位视图上的放射学茎填充。结果:单锥形准备拉刀的中位尺寸为8(范围5-12),TTP后的最终柄尺寸为11(范围6-13)。TTP总体平均干骺端填充率在正位视图为74±6%,在侧位视图为71±5%,均显著高于单锥形准备,分别为67±7%和65±7% (P < .001)。本病例未发生骨折或松动。结论:与骨干股矢状轴共线的三锥形柄的制备改善了柄的大小、配合和填充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Bone Morphogenetic Protein Augmentation of Large Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Viable Option for Massive Bone Loss Incidence and Reasons for Direct Transfers Among Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Performed at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Low Preoperative Platelet Count Is Associated With Deep Surgical Site Infection in Knee Arthroplasty Quantifying the Opportunity Cost of Resident Involvement in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty No Additive Analgesic Effect of Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee Block Over Local Infiltration Analgesia Only Around Arthrotomy Site in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1