Effect of nursing process-based nursing decision implementation on emergency patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02698-6
Tiantian Wan, Caixia Wang, Jingli Shi, Shujian Wu
{"title":"Effect of nursing process-based nursing decision implementation on emergency patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Tiantian Wan, Caixia Wang, Jingli Shi, Shujian Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02698-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article aimed to assess the impact of nursing decision interventions based on the nursing process on the clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The main research question was whether nursing decision-making interventions can improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute STEMI (ASTEMI), including time management, cardiac function recovery, and QoL. It was hypothesized that patients receiving nursing process-based interventions would demonstrate significant improvements in clinical outcomes, recovery time, incidence of adverse cardiac events, and QoL compared to those receiving standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted, including 205 patients with ASTEMI as the study sample, 125 cases in the intervention group (IG) and 80 cases in the control group (CG). Data on time management indicators, major cardiac adverse events, QoL scores, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through intervention, the IG suggested visibly shorter rescue time, vein opening time, intervention procedure time, and hospital stay compared to the CG; the probability of heart failure (HF), cardiac arrest, and death in the IG was visibly lower than in the CG; the physical health, mental health, social relationships, and environmental scores in the IG were visibly higher than in the CG. Further comparison of post-intervention outcomes between the IG and CG showed no statistically significant differences in serum BNP and cardiac troponin I levels (P > 0.05), with the confidence intervals (CIs) indicating that the changes between the two groups were comparable. However, when comparing post-intervention LVEF between the groups, the IG showed a significantly higher LVEF than the CG (P < 0.05), with a CI of (P = 0.03, 95% CI [0.05, 0.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improved nursing decision-making based on the nursing process not only demonstrates advantages in time management but also visibly enhances the QoL of patients with ASTEMI in the emergency setting, reduces the risk of serious cardiac adverse events, and has a positive impact on cardiac function recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02698-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article aimed to assess the impact of nursing decision interventions based on the nursing process on the clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The main research question was whether nursing decision-making interventions can improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute STEMI (ASTEMI), including time management, cardiac function recovery, and QoL. It was hypothesized that patients receiving nursing process-based interventions would demonstrate significant improvements in clinical outcomes, recovery time, incidence of adverse cardiac events, and QoL compared to those receiving standard care.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted, including 205 patients with ASTEMI as the study sample, 125 cases in the intervention group (IG) and 80 cases in the control group (CG). Data on time management indicators, major cardiac adverse events, QoL scores, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were collected.

Results: Through intervention, the IG suggested visibly shorter rescue time, vein opening time, intervention procedure time, and hospital stay compared to the CG; the probability of heart failure (HF), cardiac arrest, and death in the IG was visibly lower than in the CG; the physical health, mental health, social relationships, and environmental scores in the IG were visibly higher than in the CG. Further comparison of post-intervention outcomes between the IG and CG showed no statistically significant differences in serum BNP and cardiac troponin I levels (P > 0.05), with the confidence intervals (CIs) indicating that the changes between the two groups were comparable. However, when comparing post-intervention LVEF between the groups, the IG showed a significantly higher LVEF than the CG (P < 0.05), with a CI of (P = 0.03, 95% CI [0.05, 0.18]).

Conclusion: Improved nursing decision-making based on the nursing process not only demonstrates advantages in time management but also visibly enhances the QoL of patients with ASTEMI in the emergency setting, reduces the risk of serious cardiac adverse events, and has a positive impact on cardiac function recovery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于护理流程的护理决策实施对急诊急性st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的影响。
背景:本文旨在评估基于护理过程的护理决策干预对st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者临床结局和生活质量(QoL)的影响。主要的研究问题是护理决策干预是否可以改善急性STEMI (ASTEMI)患者的临床结果,包括时间管理、心功能恢复和生活质量。假设与接受标准护理的患者相比,接受护理过程干预的患者在临床结果、恢复时间、不良心脏事件发生率和生活质量方面均有显著改善。方法:回顾性分析205例ASTEMI患者,干预组(IG) 125例,对照组(CG) 80例。收集时间管理指标、主要心脏不良事件、生活质量评分、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、脑钠肽(BNP)和心肌肌钙蛋白I (cTnI)水平的数据。结果:IG干预后抢救时间、静脉开通时间、干预程序时间、住院时间明显短于CG;IG组心力衰竭(HF)、心脏骤停和死亡的概率明显低于CG组;IG组的生理健康、心理健康、社会关系和环境得分明显高于CG组。进一步比较IG组和CG组干预后结果,血清BNP和心肌肌钙蛋白I水平差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),可信区间(ci)表明两组变化具有可比性。然而,在比较两组干预后LVEF时,IG组的LVEF明显高于CG组(P)。结论:基于护理过程的护理决策改善不仅在时间管理方面具有优势,而且可以明显提高急诊ASTEMI患者的生活质量,降低严重心脏不良事件的发生风险,对心功能恢复有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Nursing faculty's experiences of publication stress and research integrity: a phenomenological study in Jordan universities. From classroom to clinic: analyzing the genomics competency gap across undergraduate students, graduate students, and practicing nurses in China. Heterogeneity in attitudes toward early recognition of clinical deterioration among emergency department nurses in China and its relationship with triage competence: a multicenter survey analysis. Nursing workload in Latvian intensive care units: a 3-month observation. The experience of nursing students using generative artificial intelligence: a qualitative meta-synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1