Jonas Bjärehed, Hanna Grenner, Sara Pavlovic, Magnus Nilsson
{"title":"It is harder for me: A thematic analysis of lived experience of self-care, and its relationship with self-injurious behaviors in psychiatric patients.","authors":"Jonas Bjärehed, Hanna Grenner, Sara Pavlovic, Magnus Nilsson","doi":"10.4081/qrmh.2024.12544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-injury is associated with significant psychological distress and functional impairments, including difficulties with self-care. However, little is known about how individuals engaging in self-injury perceive and manage self-care in their daily lives. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of self-care among individuals receiving psychiatric treatment for self-injury and to identify factors that support or hinder self-care capacity. Twelve participants were recruited from a psychiatric outpatient clinic and semi-structured interviews were conducted focusing on participants' perceptions of self-care, its relationship with self-injury, and factors influencing self-care. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns and themes. The analysis revealed four themes: i) <i>Why should I choose self-care?</i>, highlighting motivational challenges rooted in low self-worth and the need for meaning; ii) <i>Self-care is a difficult choice for me</i>, reflecting how emotional variability, uncertainty about self-care, and dichotomous thinking hinder decision-making; iii) <i>Self-care is beyond my control</i>, emphasizing struggles with planning, routines, and the interplay of emotional states and self-care behaviors; and iv) <i>Support can both help and hinder self-care</i>, illustrating the critical yet complex role of external support. Findings highlight the multifaceted challenges individuals face in managing self-care and its intersection with self-injury. Clinical implications include the need for tailored, person-centered interventions that address barriers to self-care. Recognizing the dual role of self-injury-as both a barrier to and a risky form of self-care-may enhance treatment approaches for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74623,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare","volume":"8 Suppl 1","pages":"12544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2024.12544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Self-injury is associated with significant psychological distress and functional impairments, including difficulties with self-care. However, little is known about how individuals engaging in self-injury perceive and manage self-care in their daily lives. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of self-care among individuals receiving psychiatric treatment for self-injury and to identify factors that support or hinder self-care capacity. Twelve participants were recruited from a psychiatric outpatient clinic and semi-structured interviews were conducted focusing on participants' perceptions of self-care, its relationship with self-injury, and factors influencing self-care. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns and themes. The analysis revealed four themes: i) Why should I choose self-care?, highlighting motivational challenges rooted in low self-worth and the need for meaning; ii) Self-care is a difficult choice for me, reflecting how emotional variability, uncertainty about self-care, and dichotomous thinking hinder decision-making; iii) Self-care is beyond my control, emphasizing struggles with planning, routines, and the interplay of emotional states and self-care behaviors; and iv) Support can both help and hinder self-care, illustrating the critical yet complex role of external support. Findings highlight the multifaceted challenges individuals face in managing self-care and its intersection with self-injury. Clinical implications include the need for tailored, person-centered interventions that address barriers to self-care. Recognizing the dual role of self-injury-as both a barrier to and a risky form of self-care-may enhance treatment approaches for this population.