Development and validation of fully automated robust deep learning models for multi-organ segmentation from whole-body CT images.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104911
Yazdan Salimi, Isaac Shiri, Zahra Mansouri, Habib Zaidi
{"title":"Development and validation of fully automated robust deep learning models for multi-organ segmentation from whole-body CT images.","authors":"Yazdan Salimi, Isaac Shiri, Zahra Mansouri, Habib Zaidi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a deep-learning framework to generate multi-organ masks from CT images in adult and pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset consisting of 4082 CT images and ground-truth manual segmentation from various databases, including 300 pediatric cases, were collected. In strategy#1, the manual segmentation masks provided by public databases were split into training (90%) and testing (10% of each database named subset #1) cohort. The training set was used to train multiple nnU-Net networks in five-fold cross-validation (CV) for 26 separate organs. In the next step, the trained models from strategy #1 were used to generate missing organs for the entire dataset. This generated data was then used to train a multi-organ nnU-Net segmentation model in a five-fold CV (strategy#2). Models' performance were evaluated in terms of Dice coefficient (DSC) and other well-established image segmentation metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest CV DSC for strategy#1 was 0.804 ± 0.094 for adrenal glands while average DSC > 0.90 were achieved for 17/26 organs. The lowest DSC for strategy#2 (0.833 ± 0.177) was obtained for the pancreas, whereas DSC > 0.90 was achieved for 13/19 of the organs. For all mutual organs included in subset #1 and subset #2, our model outperformed the TotalSegmentator models in both strategies. In addition, our models outperformed the TotalSegmentator models on subset #3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our model was trained on images with significant variability from different databases, producing acceptable results on both pediatric and adult cases, making it well-suited for implementation in clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"130 ","pages":"104911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a deep-learning framework to generate multi-organ masks from CT images in adult and pediatric patients.

Methods: A dataset consisting of 4082 CT images and ground-truth manual segmentation from various databases, including 300 pediatric cases, were collected. In strategy#1, the manual segmentation masks provided by public databases were split into training (90%) and testing (10% of each database named subset #1) cohort. The training set was used to train multiple nnU-Net networks in five-fold cross-validation (CV) for 26 separate organs. In the next step, the trained models from strategy #1 were used to generate missing organs for the entire dataset. This generated data was then used to train a multi-organ nnU-Net segmentation model in a five-fold CV (strategy#2). Models' performance were evaluated in terms of Dice coefficient (DSC) and other well-established image segmentation metrics.

Results: The lowest CV DSC for strategy#1 was 0.804 ± 0.094 for adrenal glands while average DSC > 0.90 were achieved for 17/26 organs. The lowest DSC for strategy#2 (0.833 ± 0.177) was obtained for the pancreas, whereas DSC > 0.90 was achieved for 13/19 of the organs. For all mutual organs included in subset #1 and subset #2, our model outperformed the TotalSegmentator models in both strategies. In addition, our models outperformed the TotalSegmentator models on subset #3.

Conclusions: Our model was trained on images with significant variability from different databases, producing acceptable results on both pediatric and adult cases, making it well-suited for implementation in clinical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Determining the optimal surface tracking area on the stereotactic mask in brain stereotactic radiosurgery using thermo-optical surface-guided radiotherapy. Development and validation of fully automated robust deep learning models for multi-organ segmentation from whole-body CT images. Evaluation of a modified formalism for precision electron beam dosimetry compared to TG-51 and TRS-398. Breast ultrasound imaging systems performance evaluation using novel Contrast-Detail (C-D) and Anechoic-Target (A-T) phantoms. Intrafraction motion in intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans: A multi-institutional investigation on robustness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1