Organic cropping systems alter metabolic potential and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling capacity of soil microbial communities

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109737
Hans-Martin Krause, Ralf C. Mueller, Martina Lori, Jochen Mayer, Paul Mäder, Martin Hartmann
{"title":"Organic cropping systems alter metabolic potential and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling capacity of soil microbial communities","authors":"Hans-Martin Krause, Ralf C. Mueller, Martina Lori, Jochen Mayer, Paul Mäder, Martin Hartmann","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive agriculture can impair soil quality and threaten the provision of critical soil ecosystem services. Organic cropping systems aim to ensure sustainable production by promoting soil biodiversity to enhance soil functioning and regulate nutrient cycling through microbial processes. While taxonomic changes in microbial community composition in response to agricultural management are well described, there is still a fundamental knowledge gap when it comes to the impact of cropping system on soil functional diversity. Therefore, we revisited the 42-year-old DOK field experiment and used shotgun metagenomics to assess the metabolic potential and nutrient cycling capacities in organic and conventionally managed soils. The functional annotation of 11.4 billion reads to universal (EC, SEED), as well as carbon (CAZy), nitrogen (NCycDB) and phosphorus (PCycDB) cycling gene ontologies showed that manure fertilization was the main factor altering soil metabolic potential. But also, organic management practices, such as omission of synthetic pesticides and mineral fertilization induced changes in soil metabolic potential e.g. by enriching functional genes involved in organic phosphorus acquisition, nitrate transformation, organic degradation and non-hydrolytic carbohydrate cleavage. Conventional systems, receiving mineral fertilization and chemical plant protection, enriched genes associated with inorganic nutrient acquisition and transcriptional activity. The results of this study demonstrate that cropping systems influence the functional potential of soils, affecting fundamental mechanisms of nutrient cycling and thus soil regulating capacity. Consequently, cropping systems can be utilized to steer the regulating potential of agricultural soils and to lower the environmental impact of food systems.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive agriculture can impair soil quality and threaten the provision of critical soil ecosystem services. Organic cropping systems aim to ensure sustainable production by promoting soil biodiversity to enhance soil functioning and regulate nutrient cycling through microbial processes. While taxonomic changes in microbial community composition in response to agricultural management are well described, there is still a fundamental knowledge gap when it comes to the impact of cropping system on soil functional diversity. Therefore, we revisited the 42-year-old DOK field experiment and used shotgun metagenomics to assess the metabolic potential and nutrient cycling capacities in organic and conventionally managed soils. The functional annotation of 11.4 billion reads to universal (EC, SEED), as well as carbon (CAZy), nitrogen (NCycDB) and phosphorus (PCycDB) cycling gene ontologies showed that manure fertilization was the main factor altering soil metabolic potential. But also, organic management practices, such as omission of synthetic pesticides and mineral fertilization induced changes in soil metabolic potential e.g. by enriching functional genes involved in organic phosphorus acquisition, nitrate transformation, organic degradation and non-hydrolytic carbohydrate cleavage. Conventional systems, receiving mineral fertilization and chemical plant protection, enriched genes associated with inorganic nutrient acquisition and transcriptional activity. The results of this study demonstrate that cropping systems influence the functional potential of soils, affecting fundamental mechanisms of nutrient cycling and thus soil regulating capacity. Consequently, cropping systems can be utilized to steer the regulating potential of agricultural soils and to lower the environmental impact of food systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Organic cropping systems alter metabolic potential and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling capacity of soil microbial communities Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Input of high-quality litter reduces soil carbon losses due to priming in a subtropical pine forest” [Soil Biology and Biochemistry 194 (2024) 109444] A global meta-analysis of soil respiration in response to elevated CO2 Reduction of iron-organic carbon associations shifts net greenhouse gas release after initial permafrost thaw
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1