Environmental science, policy, and industry nexus: Integrating Frameworks for better transport sustainability

IF 3.1 Q1 Social Sciences Global Transitions Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.glt.2024.12.001
Nahed Bahman , Naser Naser , Ezzat Khan , Tariq Mahmood
{"title":"Environmental science, policy, and industry nexus: Integrating Frameworks for better transport sustainability","authors":"Nahed Bahman ,&nbsp;Naser Naser ,&nbsp;Ezzat Khan ,&nbsp;Tariq Mahmood","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transport sector is one of the primary contributors to climate change since greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have grown by about 80 % from 1990 to 2019. Energy use by this sector has increased over the years, now accounting for up to one-fifth of global energy use. This research, based on the necessity to improve sustainability in the transport sector in terms of increasing environmental impacts, and limitations in frameworks developed, seeks to integrate better and more effective assessments with mitigation measures. Despite the advances made in environmental sustainability, both scientists and policymakers recognize significant gaps in existing methods for measuring and reducing transport emissions. This study presents an integrated framework combining elements of Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data, thus enhancing policy effectiveness in the sector. The study relies on sound data from LCAs in guiding the formulation of Policy Instruments and Policy Mixes. The methodology involves statistical analysis of surveys and LCA data within a policy context, focusing on sustainability assessment of transport systems. Important findings in key results show that embedding LCA into policy frameworks effectively helps minimize impacts on the environment and enhances sustainability within transport systems. Such important implications have been seen as valuable to policymakers and industries by proposing integration of LCA into environmental policies as a way of minimizing further burdens on the environment in addition to propelling climate change mitigation efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791824000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transport sector is one of the primary contributors to climate change since greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have grown by about 80 % from 1990 to 2019. Energy use by this sector has increased over the years, now accounting for up to one-fifth of global energy use. This research, based on the necessity to improve sustainability in the transport sector in terms of increasing environmental impacts, and limitations in frameworks developed, seeks to integrate better and more effective assessments with mitigation measures. Despite the advances made in environmental sustainability, both scientists and policymakers recognize significant gaps in existing methods for measuring and reducing transport emissions. This study presents an integrated framework combining elements of Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data, thus enhancing policy effectiveness in the sector. The study relies on sound data from LCAs in guiding the formulation of Policy Instruments and Policy Mixes. The methodology involves statistical analysis of surveys and LCA data within a policy context, focusing on sustainability assessment of transport systems. Important findings in key results show that embedding LCA into policy frameworks effectively helps minimize impacts on the environment and enhances sustainability within transport systems. Such important implications have been seen as valuable to policymakers and industries by proposing integration of LCA into environmental policies as a way of minimizing further burdens on the environment in addition to propelling climate change mitigation efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境科学、政策和产业关系:整合框架以提高交通的可持续性
交通运输部门是气候变化的主要贡献者之一,因为温室气体(GHG)排放量从1990年到2019年增长了约80%。多年来,该部门的能源使用量一直在增加,目前占全球能源使用量的五分之一。这项研究基于在日益增加的环境影响方面提高运输部门可持续性的必要性以及所制定框架的局限性,力求将更好和更有效的评估与缓解措施结合起来。尽管在环境可持续性方面取得了进展,但科学家和政策制定者都认识到,衡量和减少交通排放的现有方法存在重大差距。本研究提出了一个综合环境评估(IEA)与生命周期评估(LCA)数据相结合的综合框架,从而提高了该部门的政策有效性。该研究依靠lca提供的可靠数据来指导政策工具和政策组合的制定。方法包括在政策范围内对调查和LCA数据进行统计分析,重点是运输系统的可持续性评估。关键结果中的重要发现表明,将LCA纳入政策框架有助于有效地减少对环境的影响,并提高运输系统的可持续性。这些重要的影响被视为对决策者和工业界有价值的建议,建议将LCA纳入环境政策,作为除推动减缓气候变化努力外尽量减少对环境的进一步负担的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards a resilient agri-industry: The role of knowledge and digital economies in enhancing environmental governance Nonlinear climate–Liver gradients: Non-optimal temperature and variability increase risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease Racial disparities in the association of epigenetic age acceleration with the transition between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment and dementia Urban-rural disparities in self-reported dengue infection: A comprehensive analysis of the 2023 Indonesian health survey Integrating climate change, food security, and innovative agriculture in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL): A Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1