Zekai Wan , Qiuyu Ren , Qingsong Li , Zhouyu Liu , Shuai Wang , Xiaodong Shi
{"title":"The three amino acids at the C-terminus of pep63 are not necessary for its interaction with soluble Aβ oligomers","authors":"Zekai Wan , Qiuyu Ren , Qingsong Li , Zhouyu Liu , Shuai Wang , Xiaodong Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soluble β-amyloid oligomers (SAβOs) are linked to early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cognitive decline. Our previous work identified pep63, a neuroprotective peptide composed of ten amino acids, that blocks EphB2-SAβO interaction and improves the cognitive dysfunction in an AD mouse model. In this study, we constructed fourteen truncated variants of pep63 to find the key sequences for SAβO binding. Results of the peptide array assay showed that all the N-terminal truncated variants showed a significant decrease in their abilities to bind SAβOs, indicating that the amino acids at the N-terminus are essential for pep63-SAβO interaction. However, for the C-terminal truncated variants, the deletion of the terminal one, two, or three amino acids did not affect the binding of pep63 to SAβOs. Further studies indicated that the removal of the three amino acids at the C-terminus did not affect the ability of pep63 to interfere with the EphB2-SAβO interaction <em>in vitro</em>. Together, these results suggest that the three amino acids at the C-terminus of pep63 are not necessary for pep63-SAβO interaction, and subsequent research could consider the therapeutic strategy using a truncated form of pep63 without the corresponding amino acids. Our data provide clues and a basis for guiding the further optimization and modification of pep63.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1850 ","pages":"Article 149389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899324006449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soluble β-amyloid oligomers (SAβOs) are linked to early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cognitive decline. Our previous work identified pep63, a neuroprotective peptide composed of ten amino acids, that blocks EphB2-SAβO interaction and improves the cognitive dysfunction in an AD mouse model. In this study, we constructed fourteen truncated variants of pep63 to find the key sequences for SAβO binding. Results of the peptide array assay showed that all the N-terminal truncated variants showed a significant decrease in their abilities to bind SAβOs, indicating that the amino acids at the N-terminus are essential for pep63-SAβO interaction. However, for the C-terminal truncated variants, the deletion of the terminal one, two, or three amino acids did not affect the binding of pep63 to SAβOs. Further studies indicated that the removal of the three amino acids at the C-terminus did not affect the ability of pep63 to interfere with the EphB2-SAβO interaction in vitro. Together, these results suggest that the three amino acids at the C-terminus of pep63 are not necessary for pep63-SAβO interaction, and subsequent research could consider the therapeutic strategy using a truncated form of pep63 without the corresponding amino acids. Our data provide clues and a basis for guiding the further optimization and modification of pep63.
期刊介绍:
An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences.
Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed.
With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.