The effects of structured family auditory stimulation on preventing ICU delirium among patients with unplanned admissions: A randomized controlled study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103944
Yajun Ma , Yuping Zhang , Nianqi Cui , Zhiting Guo , Jingfen Jin
{"title":"The effects of structured family auditory stimulation on preventing ICU delirium among patients with unplanned admissions: A randomized controlled study","authors":"Yajun Ma ,&nbsp;Yuping Zhang ,&nbsp;Nianqi Cui ,&nbsp;Zhiting Guo ,&nbsp;Jingfen Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the effect of a structured family auditory stimulation on preventing ICU delirium among patients with unplanned admissions.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A three-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was designed.</div></div><div><h3>Research methodology</h3><div>Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: structured family auditory stimulation (Group A), unstructured family auditory stimulation (Group B), and usual care (Group C). The primary outcome was delirium incidence, and secondary outcomes included delirium severity, delirium duration, delirium-free days, delirium subtypes, time to first delirium, the family anxiety and depression levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 213 patients were randomly assigned to three groups. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics among the three groups. For the primary outcome, fewer patients developed delirium in Group A than in Group B and Group C (22.5 % vs. 26.8 % vs. 49.3 %, <em>P =</em> 0.001). For secondary outcomes, Group A had lower delirium severity scores than the other groups did (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.3 vs. 5.1 ± 0.3, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Patients in Group A had shorter delirium durations (2.0 vs. 3.0 vs.4.0 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and longer delirium-free days (3.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 1.0 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than those in Group B and Group C. The time to first delirium was 3.0, 2.0, and 2.0 days, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The SAS scores of the families in the three groups were 47.1 ± 5.7, 48.9 ± 5.5, and 56.5 ± 7.5 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and the SDS scores were 38.2 ± 5.8, 38.3 ± 5.7, and 42.7 ± 7.2 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results revealed that structured family auditory stimulation could reduce delirium incidence, decrease its severity, shorten the duration of delirium, increase delirium-free days, and prolong the time to first delirium among ICU patients with unplanned admission. Additionally, it could alleviate families’ anxiety and depression levels.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>Structured family auditory stimulation prevents ICU delirium by maintaining the patients’ cognitive function and promoting early recovery, showing significant clinical potential in ICU delirium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103944"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the effect of a structured family auditory stimulation on preventing ICU delirium among patients with unplanned admissions.

Design

A three-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was designed.

Research methodology

Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: structured family auditory stimulation (Group A), unstructured family auditory stimulation (Group B), and usual care (Group C). The primary outcome was delirium incidence, and secondary outcomes included delirium severity, delirium duration, delirium-free days, delirium subtypes, time to first delirium, the family anxiety and depression levels.

Results

A total of 213 patients were randomly assigned to three groups. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics among the three groups. For the primary outcome, fewer patients developed delirium in Group A than in Group B and Group C (22.5 % vs. 26.8 % vs. 49.3 %, P = 0.001). For secondary outcomes, Group A had lower delirium severity scores than the other groups did (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.3 vs. 5.1 ± 0.3, P < 0.001). Patients in Group A had shorter delirium durations (2.0 vs. 3.0 vs.4.0 days, P < 0.001) and longer delirium-free days (3.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 1.0 days, P < 0.001) than those in Group B and Group C. The time to first delirium was 3.0, 2.0, and 2.0 days, respectively (P < 0.001). The SAS scores of the families in the three groups were 47.1 ± 5.7, 48.9 ± 5.5, and 56.5 ± 7.5 (P < 0.001) and the SDS scores were 38.2 ± 5.8, 38.3 ± 5.7, and 42.7 ± 7.2 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results revealed that structured family auditory stimulation could reduce delirium incidence, decrease its severity, shorten the duration of delirium, increase delirium-free days, and prolong the time to first delirium among ICU patients with unplanned admission. Additionally, it could alleviate families’ anxiety and depression levels.

Implications for clinical practice

Structured family auditory stimulation prevents ICU delirium by maintaining the patients’ cognitive function and promoting early recovery, showing significant clinical potential in ICU delirium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
The effects of structured family auditory stimulation on preventing ICU delirium among patients with unplanned admissions: A randomized controlled study Waiting to be discharged from intensive care units: Key factors shaping patient and family experiences The potential impact of critical illness on sexuality Factors associated with good death for end-of-life patients in the intensive care unit based on nurses’ perspectives: A systematic review Incidence and characteristics of device-related pressure injuries in intensive care: A four-year analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1