Trying tongs and spoiling spoons: Effort nudges influence food consumption and may motivate healthier food decisions

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105435
Tobias Otterbring , Erik Thomassen , Casper Solli Øritsland , Gastón Ares
{"title":"Trying tongs and spoiling spoons: Effort nudges influence food consumption and may motivate healthier food decisions","authors":"Tobias Otterbring ,&nbsp;Erik Thomassen ,&nbsp;Casper Solli Øritsland ,&nbsp;Gastón Ares","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Healthier eating is crucial to tackle the rapid rise of obesity and noncommunicable diseases worldwide. This research examined two nudging interventions intended to decrease food consumption: price display and serving utensils. Forecasting experiments showed that people predicted displaying the price of the food per kg (vs. hg) should decrease the amount of food purchased (Study 1 A), but that using tongs (vs. spoon) would be ineffective (Study 1B). In contrast to these results, a high-powered preregistered field study at a university canteen (Study 2) revealed that price display had no notable effect; however, tongs (vs. spoon) reliably decreased the average amount of food purchased per meal by 14 g or 3.1 %, also when compared to weeks when both types of serving utensils were available. An image-supported online experiment with enhanced rigor and control (Study 3) replicated the results regarding tongs (vs. spoon) for a particularly unhealthy food category (candy), while highlighting a psychological mechanism driving the effect. Using tongs required more effort, which decreased satisfaction tied to using said serving utensils, thereby reducing people's willingness to consume candy. Given the simplicity and cost effectiveness of swapping spoons with tongs, combined with the behavioral evidence underscoring its practical relevance, these findings might aid in steering consumers to healthier food decisions, ultimately benefiting public health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthier eating is crucial to tackle the rapid rise of obesity and noncommunicable diseases worldwide. This research examined two nudging interventions intended to decrease food consumption: price display and serving utensils. Forecasting experiments showed that people predicted displaying the price of the food per kg (vs. hg) should decrease the amount of food purchased (Study 1 A), but that using tongs (vs. spoon) would be ineffective (Study 1B). In contrast to these results, a high-powered preregistered field study at a university canteen (Study 2) revealed that price display had no notable effect; however, tongs (vs. spoon) reliably decreased the average amount of food purchased per meal by 14 g or 3.1 %, also when compared to weeks when both types of serving utensils were available. An image-supported online experiment with enhanced rigor and control (Study 3) replicated the results regarding tongs (vs. spoon) for a particularly unhealthy food category (candy), while highlighting a psychological mechanism driving the effect. Using tongs required more effort, which decreased satisfaction tied to using said serving utensils, thereby reducing people's willingness to consume candy. Given the simplicity and cost effectiveness of swapping spoons with tongs, combined with the behavioral evidence underscoring its practical relevance, these findings might aid in steering consumers to healthier food decisions, ultimately benefiting public health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尝试大钳子和坏掉的勺子:努力会影响食物的消耗,可能会促使人们选择更健康的食物
健康饮食对于解决世界范围内肥胖和非传染性疾病迅速增加的问题至关重要。这项研究考察了两种旨在减少食物消费的助推干预措施:价格展示和服务器具。预测实验表明,人们预测显示每公斤食物的价格(相对于汞柱)应该会减少购买的食物数量(研究1a),但使用夹子(相对于勺子)将是无效的(研究1B)。与这些结果相反,在一所大学食堂进行的一项高强度的预登记实地研究(研究2)显示,价格显示没有显著影响;然而,夹子(相对于勺子)确实减少了每餐平均购买的食物量14克或3.1%,也与两种类型的服务器具都可用的周相比。一项有图片支持的在线实验(研究3)加强了严格性和控制性,重复了对一种特别不健康的食品类别(糖果)使用钳子(与勺子)的结果,同时强调了驱动这种效果的心理机制。使用夹子需要更多的努力,这降低了使用上述服务工具的满意度,从而降低了人们消费糖果的意愿。考虑到将勺子换成钳子的简单性和成本效益,再加上行为证据强调其实际意义,这些发现可能有助于引导消费者做出更健康的食品决定,最终有利于公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Analytic-holistic tendencies differentially impact consumer response dependent on measurement method and context: A case study with chocolate Effectiveness of different front-of-pack nutritional labels in promoting greater adherence to the mediterranean diet among Italian consumers ‘I can't resist’: Incentive salience for ultra-processed food cues matches erotic cues in individuals with food addiction Can health information and Price incentives promote whole-grain bread choices? A real purchase experiment in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1