Gastronomizing legumes: Can we increase legume consumption in restaurants by improving the sensory experience and modifying the portions of legumes and meat on the plate?

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105459
Audrey Cosson , Maxime Sebbane , Elsa Chevillard , Anestis Dougkas
{"title":"Gastronomizing legumes: Can we increase legume consumption in restaurants by improving the sensory experience and modifying the portions of legumes and meat on the plate?","authors":"Audrey Cosson ,&nbsp;Maxime Sebbane ,&nbsp;Elsa Chevillard ,&nbsp;Anestis Dougkas","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adopting diets that recalibrate the balance between animal and plant proteins emerges as a sustainable solution in response to global population growth and climate change. This study investigates the impact of reducing animal protein (meat) portions in favour of plant proteins (legumes) on consumer appreciation and consumption in restaurant settings. Employing a single-blind protocol, 271 participants were engaged in an experimental restaurant. The experimental design examined the effects of meat-to-legume ratio (reference: 150 g meat, 200 g legumes; reduced: 95 g meat, 260 g legumes), legume types (chickpeas vs. white beans), and meat types (pork vs. beef). Appetite and liking were assessed using visual analogue scales, while food consumption was measured post-meal. Overall, participants consumed between 100 % and 80 % of their main course. ANOVA analysis on reference meat-to-legume ratio, legume type, and meat type effects on taste and appetite revealed minimal differences (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Notably, the reference meat-to-legume ratio scored lower than the reference in overall main course appreciation (7.23/10 vs. 8.31/10) and taste (7.26/10 vs. 8.40/10) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). This underscores the potential to enhance legume proportion on the plate while preserving satiety and overall consumption through meticulous attention to legume sensory experience and protein portion adjustments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adopting diets that recalibrate the balance between animal and plant proteins emerges as a sustainable solution in response to global population growth and climate change. This study investigates the impact of reducing animal protein (meat) portions in favour of plant proteins (legumes) on consumer appreciation and consumption in restaurant settings. Employing a single-blind protocol, 271 participants were engaged in an experimental restaurant. The experimental design examined the effects of meat-to-legume ratio (reference: 150 g meat, 200 g legumes; reduced: 95 g meat, 260 g legumes), legume types (chickpeas vs. white beans), and meat types (pork vs. beef). Appetite and liking were assessed using visual analogue scales, while food consumption was measured post-meal. Overall, participants consumed between 100 % and 80 % of their main course. ANOVA analysis on reference meat-to-legume ratio, legume type, and meat type effects on taste and appetite revealed minimal differences (P < 0.05). Notably, the reference meat-to-legume ratio scored lower than the reference in overall main course appreciation (7.23/10 vs. 8.31/10) and taste (7.26/10 vs. 8.40/10) (P < 0.05). This underscores the potential to enhance legume proportion on the plate while preserving satiety and overall consumption through meticulous attention to legume sensory experience and protein portion adjustments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
More than a feeling: Development of an EmoSemio questionnaire to evaluate emotions evoked by cell-cultivated meat label terms in Singapore and the USA Impact of pivot selection and lexicon utilization on pivot profile analysis of food off-odor reduction: The case of soymilk Evaluating the multi-faceted effect of concurrent front-of-pack nutrition and ecolabels on food evaluation Can natural language processing or large language models replace human operators for pre-processing word and sentence-based free comments sensory evaluation data? Low-income consumers' perceptions of ultra-processed foods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1