Gastronomizing legumes: Can we increase legume consumption in restaurants by improving the sensory experience and modifying the portions of legumes and meat on the plate?

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105459
Audrey Cosson , Maxime Sebbane , Elsa Chevillard , Anestis Dougkas
{"title":"Gastronomizing legumes: Can we increase legume consumption in restaurants by improving the sensory experience and modifying the portions of legumes and meat on the plate?","authors":"Audrey Cosson ,&nbsp;Maxime Sebbane ,&nbsp;Elsa Chevillard ,&nbsp;Anestis Dougkas","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adopting diets that recalibrate the balance between animal and plant proteins emerges as a sustainable solution in response to global population growth and climate change. This study investigates the impact of reducing animal protein (meat) portions in favour of plant proteins (legumes) on consumer appreciation and consumption in restaurant settings. Employing a single-blind protocol, 271 participants were engaged in an experimental restaurant. The experimental design examined the effects of meat-to-legume ratio (reference: 150 g meat, 200 g legumes; reduced: 95 g meat, 260 g legumes), legume types (chickpeas vs. white beans), and meat types (pork vs. beef). Appetite and liking were assessed using visual analogue scales, while food consumption was measured post-meal. Overall, participants consumed between 100 % and 80 % of their main course. ANOVA analysis on reference meat-to-legume ratio, legume type, and meat type effects on taste and appetite revealed minimal differences (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Notably, the reference meat-to-legume ratio scored lower than the reference in overall main course appreciation (7.23/10 vs. 8.31/10) and taste (7.26/10 vs. 8.40/10) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). This underscores the potential to enhance legume proportion on the plate while preserving satiety and overall consumption through meticulous attention to legume sensory experience and protein portion adjustments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adopting diets that recalibrate the balance between animal and plant proteins emerges as a sustainable solution in response to global population growth and climate change. This study investigates the impact of reducing animal protein (meat) portions in favour of plant proteins (legumes) on consumer appreciation and consumption in restaurant settings. Employing a single-blind protocol, 271 participants were engaged in an experimental restaurant. The experimental design examined the effects of meat-to-legume ratio (reference: 150 g meat, 200 g legumes; reduced: 95 g meat, 260 g legumes), legume types (chickpeas vs. white beans), and meat types (pork vs. beef). Appetite and liking were assessed using visual analogue scales, while food consumption was measured post-meal. Overall, participants consumed between 100 % and 80 % of their main course. ANOVA analysis on reference meat-to-legume ratio, legume type, and meat type effects on taste and appetite revealed minimal differences (P < 0.05). Notably, the reference meat-to-legume ratio scored lower than the reference in overall main course appreciation (7.23/10 vs. 8.31/10) and taste (7.26/10 vs. 8.40/10) (P < 0.05). This underscores the potential to enhance legume proportion on the plate while preserving satiety and overall consumption through meticulous attention to legume sensory experience and protein portion adjustments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豆类美食化:我们能否通过改善感官体验和调整餐盘上豆类和肉类的比例来增加餐厅的豆类消费?
采用重新调整动植物蛋白质平衡的饮食成为应对全球人口增长和气候变化的可持续解决方案。本研究调查了减少动物蛋白(肉类)的份量而增加植物蛋白(豆类)对消费者欣赏和餐馆消费的影响。采用单盲协议,271名参与者在一家实验餐厅工作。试验设计考察了肉与豆类比例的影响(参考:150 g肉,200 g豆类;减少:95克肉类,260克豆类),豆类类型(鹰嘴豆vs白豆)和肉类类型(猪肉vs牛肉)。食欲和喜欢程度是用视觉模拟量表来评估的,而食物消耗是在餐后测量的。总的来说,参与者消耗了100%到80%的主菜。参考肉与豆类比例、豆类类型和肉类类型对味觉和食欲的影响的方差分析显示差异极小(P <;0.05)。值得注意的是,参考肉与豆类的比例得分低于参考主菜的整体欣赏度(7.23/10比8.31/10)和味道(7.26/10比8.40/10)(P <;0.05)。这强调了通过对豆类感官体验和蛋白质比例调整的细致关注,在保持饱腹感和整体消费的同时,提高盘中豆类比例的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory judgments and learned utility: how context shapes sports drink perception Machine learning for predicting aroma, flavour and preference of foods and beverages: case studies with small and imbalanced datasets Editorial Board Drivers, barriers, and intentions related to substituting meat with pulses: a comparative study in at-home and out-of-home settings in Germany Analytic-holistic tendencies differentially impact consumer response dependent on measurement method and context: A case study with chocolate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1