Low-income consumers' perceptions of ultra-processed foods

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105457
Silvia Sapio , Gerarda Caso , Azzurra Annunziata , Riccardo Vecchio
{"title":"Low-income consumers' perceptions of ultra-processed foods","authors":"Silvia Sapio ,&nbsp;Gerarda Caso ,&nbsp;Azzurra Annunziata ,&nbsp;Riccardo Vecchio","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years there has been a rapid surge of consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in many developed countries. UPFs are characterized by high levels of fat, salt and sugar, which are in opposition to the World Health Organization's guidelines, advocating for the limitation of foods with high concentrations of these nutrients. To implement effective public policy interventions, it is important to understand the perception of UPFs among final consumers. The present study contributes to current knowledge providing quantitative evidence on the processing, healthiness, and tastiness perceptions of UPFs among low-income Italian consumers. A sample of 810 consumers were surveyed using an online questionnaire including a food shopping task with minimally processed foods and UPFs. Findings reveal an overall adequate awareness of the amount of processing needed to create certain food products. Additionally, low-income consumers did not perceive the investigated UPFs as extremely distant from their actual processing and healthiness classifications. Nevertheless, respondents generally perceived seemingly more processed foods as being less healthy. Results do not underline the need for policymakers to prioritize interventions aimed at fostering an increase of knowledge of UPFs among this socioeconomically disadvantaged group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105457"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years there has been a rapid surge of consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in many developed countries. UPFs are characterized by high levels of fat, salt and sugar, which are in opposition to the World Health Organization's guidelines, advocating for the limitation of foods with high concentrations of these nutrients. To implement effective public policy interventions, it is important to understand the perception of UPFs among final consumers. The present study contributes to current knowledge providing quantitative evidence on the processing, healthiness, and tastiness perceptions of UPFs among low-income Italian consumers. A sample of 810 consumers were surveyed using an online questionnaire including a food shopping task with minimally processed foods and UPFs. Findings reveal an overall adequate awareness of the amount of processing needed to create certain food products. Additionally, low-income consumers did not perceive the investigated UPFs as extremely distant from their actual processing and healthiness classifications. Nevertheless, respondents generally perceived seemingly more processed foods as being less healthy. Results do not underline the need for policymakers to prioritize interventions aimed at fostering an increase of knowledge of UPFs among this socioeconomically disadvantaged group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Can natural language processing or large language models replace human operators for pre-processing word and sentence-based free comments sensory evaluation data? Low-income consumers' perceptions of ultra-processed foods The emulsion-filled gels with different fat contents exhibit various friction behavior and dynamic fat-related texture perception at different temperatures New challenges and perspectives on the organic halo effect on calories estimation: A brief review and Meta-analysis Gastronomizing legumes: Can we increase legume consumption in restaurants by improving the sensory experience and modifying the portions of legumes and meat on the plate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1