Distribution patterns and driving mechanisms of land use spatial conflicts: Empirical analysis from counties in China

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Habitat International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103268
Shanshan Zong , Shan Xu , Jiachen Huang , Yuhan Ren , Ci Song
{"title":"Distribution patterns and driving mechanisms of land use spatial conflicts: Empirical analysis from counties in China","authors":"Shanshan Zong ,&nbsp;Shan Xu ,&nbsp;Jiachen Huang ,&nbsp;Yuhan Ren ,&nbsp;Ci Song","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conflict between environmental protection and human development is inevitable given China's explosive socio-economic growth. Diagnosing land use conflicts (LUCs) and exploring their driving forces are prerequisites for alleviating land disputes. Based on the land use remote sensing monitoring data in 2020, this study established a conceptual framework and mathematical model of potential LUCs according to the suitability criteria by using multi-factor superposition method, analyzed the types, intensities and spatial pattern characteristics of LUCs in Chinese Mainland. Furthermore, the driving factors of spatial conflicts were investigated using spatial econometric and geographically weighted regression models. The results showed that the spatial distribution of the three types of land suitability in China was seriously mismatched. At the grid scale, about 70.07% of the regions in Chinese Mainland were in a state of potential LUCs. Bounded by the Hu Huanyong Line, the conflict type in the west was mainly agricultural-ecological land, while in the east conflict was mainly agricultural-construction land. At the county scale, 1176 counties were in a state of potential high-intensity conflict, and the conflict index showed a polarized distribution of “high in the East and low in the West” in space. The spatial agglomeration pattern of LUCs was the aftereffect of the combined action of natural and social factors. It should be pointed out that regional dominant factors played different or even opposite roles in different spaces. The logical framework and results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the comprehensive layout of different types of land in the preparation of national spatial planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 103268"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524002686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflict between environmental protection and human development is inevitable given China's explosive socio-economic growth. Diagnosing land use conflicts (LUCs) and exploring their driving forces are prerequisites for alleviating land disputes. Based on the land use remote sensing monitoring data in 2020, this study established a conceptual framework and mathematical model of potential LUCs according to the suitability criteria by using multi-factor superposition method, analyzed the types, intensities and spatial pattern characteristics of LUCs in Chinese Mainland. Furthermore, the driving factors of spatial conflicts were investigated using spatial econometric and geographically weighted regression models. The results showed that the spatial distribution of the three types of land suitability in China was seriously mismatched. At the grid scale, about 70.07% of the regions in Chinese Mainland were in a state of potential LUCs. Bounded by the Hu Huanyong Line, the conflict type in the west was mainly agricultural-ecological land, while in the east conflict was mainly agricultural-construction land. At the county scale, 1176 counties were in a state of potential high-intensity conflict, and the conflict index showed a polarized distribution of “high in the East and low in the West” in space. The spatial agglomeration pattern of LUCs was the aftereffect of the combined action of natural and social factors. It should be pointed out that regional dominant factors played different or even opposite roles in different spaces. The logical framework and results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the comprehensive layout of different types of land in the preparation of national spatial planning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of “One Household One Plot” and “One Village Group One Plot” fragmentation consolidation models on cultivated land use transition from perspective of human-land system A new conceptual framework and case analysis of rural environmental cross-boundary governance in megacities of China Promoting or inhibiting? The impact of farmland use transition on rural household income: Evidence from the Three Northeast Provinces, China Rising South, shrinking North: Paradoxically increased unevenness in the global urban economic system Distribution patterns and driving mechanisms of land use spatial conflicts: Empirical analysis from counties in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1