Do not wait: Preemptive rumor detection with cooperative LLMs and accessible social context

IF 6.9 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103995
Junyi Chen, Leyuan Liu, Fan Zhou
{"title":"Do not wait: Preemptive rumor detection with cooperative LLMs and accessible social context","authors":"Junyi Chen,&nbsp;Leyuan Liu,&nbsp;Fan Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concerning the dissemination of rumors via tweets, current methods for detecting rumors – both content-based and graph-based – do not adequately address the need for preemptive action to suppress rumors before public exposure. Although the advancement of large language models (LLMs) indicates a positive trend, their application in rumor detection remains either overly simplistic or excessively complex. Motivated by these, we put forward EvidenceRD, which employs an efficient yet effective cooperative strategy of three types of LLMs to mine informative evidence that augments content context behind tweets warranting a fact check. This is then integrated with a credibility network, an automatically generated social context based on the social homophily theory, to depict potential credibility relationships between authors of corresponding tweets. Extensive experiments across four public datasets confirm the efficacy of the proposed EvidenceRD. Specifically, EvidenceRD outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across various categories, achieving an improvement in general detection performance ranging from 3% to 16%. This superiority is achieved by exclusively utilizing pre-public information, a constraint not imposed on the comparative baselines. Besides, As EvidenceRD considers both evidence and the social context behind a tweet, it not only offers enhanced explainability through its multi-perspective evidence presented in natural language but also demonstrates greater robustness and transferability across different scenarios. Additional efficiency analysis demonstrates that the above-enhanced characteristics brought by EvidenceRD are cost-effective in terms of both financial and computational expenses. To summarize, compared to existing studies, this work theoretically presents a generally effective and efficient paradigm for utilizing LLMs in the context of rumor detection and demonstrates how integrating accessible social context can effectively detect rumors. Practically, the proposed method can accurately detect rumors before they emerge publicly with several notable metrics improvements and aid human decision-making on them from multiple dimensions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 103995"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324003546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerning the dissemination of rumors via tweets, current methods for detecting rumors – both content-based and graph-based – do not adequately address the need for preemptive action to suppress rumors before public exposure. Although the advancement of large language models (LLMs) indicates a positive trend, their application in rumor detection remains either overly simplistic or excessively complex. Motivated by these, we put forward EvidenceRD, which employs an efficient yet effective cooperative strategy of three types of LLMs to mine informative evidence that augments content context behind tweets warranting a fact check. This is then integrated with a credibility network, an automatically generated social context based on the social homophily theory, to depict potential credibility relationships between authors of corresponding tweets. Extensive experiments across four public datasets confirm the efficacy of the proposed EvidenceRD. Specifically, EvidenceRD outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across various categories, achieving an improvement in general detection performance ranging from 3% to 16%. This superiority is achieved by exclusively utilizing pre-public information, a constraint not imposed on the comparative baselines. Besides, As EvidenceRD considers both evidence and the social context behind a tweet, it not only offers enhanced explainability through its multi-perspective evidence presented in natural language but also demonstrates greater robustness and transferability across different scenarios. Additional efficiency analysis demonstrates that the above-enhanced characteristics brought by EvidenceRD are cost-effective in terms of both financial and computational expenses. To summarize, compared to existing studies, this work theoretically presents a generally effective and efficient paradigm for utilizing LLMs in the context of rumor detection and demonstrates how integrating accessible social context can effectively detect rumors. Practically, the proposed method can accurately detect rumors before they emerge publicly with several notable metrics improvements and aid human decision-making on them from multiple dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不要等待:协同llm和可访问的社会背景下的先发制人的谣言检测
关于通过推特传播的谣言,目前的谣言检测方法——无论是基于内容的还是基于图表的——都不能充分解决在公众曝光之前采取先发制人行动压制谣言的需要。尽管大型语言模型(llm)的发展呈现出积极的趋势,但它们在谣言检测中的应用仍然过于简单或过于复杂。在这些因素的推动下,我们提出了EvidenceRD,它采用三种llm的高效而有效的合作策略来挖掘信息证据,这些证据可以增强推文背后的内容上下文,从而保证事实核查。然后将其与可信度网络(基于社会同质性理论的自动生成的社会背景)相结合,以描述相应推文作者之间潜在的可信度关系。在四个公共数据集上进行的广泛实验证实了拟议的evidence erd的有效性。具体来说,eviderd在各种类别中都优于最先进的基线,将一般检测性能提高了3%至16%。这种优势是通过完全利用公开前的信息来实现的,这是对比较基线没有施加的限制。此外,由于EvidenceRD同时考虑了推文背后的证据和社会背景,它不仅通过自然语言呈现的多角度证据提供了增强的可解释性,而且在不同场景中表现出更强的鲁棒性和可移植性。额外的效率分析表明,eviderd带来的上述增强特性在财务和计算费用方面都具有成本效益。综上所述,与现有研究相比,本研究从理论上提出了一个在谣言检测背景下利用llm的普遍有效的范式,并展示了如何整合可访问的社会背景来有效地检测谣言。实际上,该方法可以在谣言公开之前准确地检测到谣言,并在多个维度上帮助人类做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
PhiMark: watermarking relational data robustly with zero distortion A self-guided few-shot semantic segmentation model based on query foreground-background similarity Emotion and noise-robust speaker identification via filter-free self-supervised learning TemFRC: Enterprise financial risk prediction with temporal folding and risk contrast A dual-source knowledge distillation framework for hate speech detection based on cognitive distortion awareness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1