Laboratory model test of contact erosion in railway substructure

Abstract

The underestimated risk of contact erosion failure in railway substructures poses a significant threat to railway safety, particularly at the interface between the ballast/subballast and subgrade. The larger constriction size at this interface exacerbates the potential for long-term erosion, necessitating attention to safeguard railway integrity. This study introduces a novel laboratory erosion testing apparatus to evaluate contact erosion at the subballast-subgrade interface under cyclic loading. Subgrade soils with varying fines contents are tested, and the effect of pressure head on erosion is investigated in detail. The results indicate that sandy soil with higher internal stability exhibits a higher critical pressure head for contact erosion. Cyclic loading induces oscillations in pore water pressure within the subballast layer, with higher pressure heads leading to larger amplitudes. Excess pore water pressure is generated in the sandy soil layer during cyclic loading and gradually dissipates over time. Fine eroded particles migrate into the subballast layer, forming mud, while coarse eroded particles accumulate at the base, creating low-permeability interlayers. Notably, the geometric conditions alone may not guarantee effective prevention of contact erosion in railway substructures. The hydraulic conditions for contact erosion are more easily achieved under cyclic loading compared to static loading. These distinctive features of contact erosion in railway substructures, different from those observed in hydraulic structures, provide some insights for the development of remediation strategies and improvements in railway substructure design.