Australian coal mining and economic diversification in the energy transition context

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105429
Fitsum Semere Weldegiorgis
{"title":"Australian coal mining and economic diversification in the energy transition context","authors":"Fitsum Semere Weldegiorgis","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Australia, with the third-largest coal reserves globally, is the fifth-largest producer and third-largest exporter of black coal, generating about half of its electricity from coal. Concerns about the loss of export earnings and jobs, energy security, and economic decline in coal-dependent regions are a critical challenge to Australia's coal phase-out plans. Employing Q-methodology and semi-structured interviews, this paper examines how diverse stakeholders in Queensland, Australia, envision managing the coal phase-out and promoting economic diversification. The analysis reveals three distinct perspectives: ‘Maximise coal utilisation’, ‘Prioritise coal phase-out’, and ‘Diversify economy as coal phases out’. These perspectives underscore the importance of multi-stakeholder narratives to shaping systemic changes through transformative vision. The analysis takes a multi-stakeholder perspective framework as a narrative approach to ground-test the ‘just transition’ concept. In doing so, the paper demonstrates that justice, in terms of the economic diversification component of coal transition, entails considering implications on multiple economic sectors of coal regions as well as the interplay of actors, policies, and processes across multiple levels of public and private sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105429"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australia, with the third-largest coal reserves globally, is the fifth-largest producer and third-largest exporter of black coal, generating about half of its electricity from coal. Concerns about the loss of export earnings and jobs, energy security, and economic decline in coal-dependent regions are a critical challenge to Australia's coal phase-out plans. Employing Q-methodology and semi-structured interviews, this paper examines how diverse stakeholders in Queensland, Australia, envision managing the coal phase-out and promoting economic diversification. The analysis reveals three distinct perspectives: ‘Maximise coal utilisation’, ‘Prioritise coal phase-out’, and ‘Diversify economy as coal phases out’. These perspectives underscore the importance of multi-stakeholder narratives to shaping systemic changes through transformative vision. The analysis takes a multi-stakeholder perspective framework as a narrative approach to ground-test the ‘just transition’ concept. In doing so, the paper demonstrates that justice, in terms of the economic diversification component of coal transition, entails considering implications on multiple economic sectors of coal regions as well as the interplay of actors, policies, and processes across multiple levels of public and private sectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源转型背景下的澳大利亚煤炭开采与经济多元化
澳大利亚拥有全球第三大煤炭储量,是全球第五大黑煤生产国和第三大出口国,约有一半的电力来自煤炭。对出口收入和就业机会减少、能源安全以及依赖煤炭地区经济衰退的担忧,是澳大利亚逐步淘汰煤炭计划面临的重大挑战。本文采用q -方法论和半结构化访谈,考察了澳大利亚昆士兰州不同的利益相关者如何设想管理煤炭淘汰和促进经济多样化。该分析揭示了三个不同的观点:“最大化煤炭利用”、“优先淘汰煤炭”和“随着煤炭淘汰实现经济多样化”。这些观点强调了多方利益相关者叙述对通过变革愿景形成系统性变革的重要性。该分析采用多方利益相关者视角框架作为叙事方法,对“公正过渡”概念进行了实地测试。在此过程中,本文表明,就煤炭转型的经济多样化组成部分而言,正义需要考虑对煤炭地区多个经济部门的影响,以及跨公共和私营部门多个层面的行动者、政策和过程的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Safety culture maturity, personal attributes, and accident experience: A study of the Ghanaian small-scale mining sector “We are Makurukuru: Gold helps us to stand firm as a human being, as women”: What can we learn from Uganda about the evolution of artisanal and small-scale mining? Adaptive royalty formulations for critical minerals amid fiscal volatility and geopolitical uncertainty Mining energy transition minerals threatens conservation and traditional peoples of the Brazilian Amazon Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1