Patient-reported Outcomes In Heart Failure: Insights From A Simplified Kccq In Heartmate 3 Lvad Recipients

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.10.053
Jennifer Cowger , Nourdine Chakouri
{"title":"Patient-reported Outcomes In Heart Failure: Insights From A Simplified Kccq In Heartmate 3 Lvad Recipients","authors":"Jennifer Cowger ,&nbsp;Nourdine Chakouri","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.10.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), are pivotal in assessing the impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support on patients’ heart failure-related quality of life (hf-QOL) as part of hierarchical outcomes. However, translating improvements in composite KCCQ scores into a meaningful message for patients and referring providers remains challenging. In registries, incompleteness of KCCQ scores is also common after 1 year, perhaps due to questionnaire length.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to a) evaluate the utility of a simplified KCCQ score in describing the LVAD patient journey and b) to generate a patient-friendly graphic on hf-QOL trajectory for use during shared decision making encounters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Question-level KCCQ responses were analyzed in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients from the MOMENTUM 3 studies (2,200 patients) preoperatively and at 6- 12-, and 24-months after implant. Patients had to complete one preoperative and ≥1 postoperative KCCQ assessment for inclusion. The simplified LVAD-KCCQ is as follows: 23 KCCQ questions from 5 domains were simplified into 5 questions, 1 from each domain. Response options were consolidated into severely, moderately and minimal/none from 5-7 prior options. The trajectories of within patient changes in the simplified KCCQ domains were evaluated at each time point.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were sustained improvements from baseline in the summary standard and simplified KCCQ scores and within each simplified domain, beginning 6 months postoperatively (table 1, figure 1). Intra-patient improvements occurred rapidly in each domain and were sustained to two years. Of those who were severely limited in their enjoyment of life (blue) prior to LVAD (n=1133), &lt;17.8% (n=202) and &lt;8.2% (n=93) had persistently severe limitations at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. Overall, 63% of patients has no/minimal limitations at 2 years (Fig 1A, Fig 2). Similar rapid and sustained improvements were noted for response to the other simplified KCCQ domains (Fig 1B-C).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An assessment of individual simplified KCCQ domain responses allows for a succinct assessment of the patient journey after HM3. These data may assist in improving KCCQ data compliance with registries and in conveying average changes in hf-QOL after LVAD to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 200-201"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424004755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), are pivotal in assessing the impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support on patients’ heart failure-related quality of life (hf-QOL) as part of hierarchical outcomes. However, translating improvements in composite KCCQ scores into a meaningful message for patients and referring providers remains challenging. In registries, incompleteness of KCCQ scores is also common after 1 year, perhaps due to questionnaire length.

Purpose

This study aims to a) evaluate the utility of a simplified KCCQ score in describing the LVAD patient journey and b) to generate a patient-friendly graphic on hf-QOL trajectory for use during shared decision making encounters.

Methods

Question-level KCCQ responses were analyzed in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients from the MOMENTUM 3 studies (2,200 patients) preoperatively and at 6- 12-, and 24-months after implant. Patients had to complete one preoperative and ≥1 postoperative KCCQ assessment for inclusion. The simplified LVAD-KCCQ is as follows: 23 KCCQ questions from 5 domains were simplified into 5 questions, 1 from each domain. Response options were consolidated into severely, moderately and minimal/none from 5-7 prior options. The trajectories of within patient changes in the simplified KCCQ domains were evaluated at each time point.

Results

There were sustained improvements from baseline in the summary standard and simplified KCCQ scores and within each simplified domain, beginning 6 months postoperatively (table 1, figure 1). Intra-patient improvements occurred rapidly in each domain and were sustained to two years. Of those who were severely limited in their enjoyment of life (blue) prior to LVAD (n=1133), <17.8% (n=202) and <8.2% (n=93) had persistently severe limitations at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. Overall, 63% of patients has no/minimal limitations at 2 years (Fig 1A, Fig 2). Similar rapid and sustained improvements were noted for response to the other simplified KCCQ domains (Fig 1B-C).

Conclusion

An assessment of individual simplified KCCQ domain responses allows for a succinct assessment of the patient journey after HM3. These data may assist in improving KCCQ data compliance with registries and in conveying average changes in hf-QOL after LVAD to patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心衰患者报告的结果:来自心伴侣3级左心室辅助器受者的简化Kccq的见解
患者报告的结果,如堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ),是评估左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持对患者心力衰竭相关生活质量(hf-QOL)影响的关键,是分层结果的一部分。然而,将综合KCCQ评分的改善转化为对患者和转诊提供者有意义的信息仍然具有挑战性。在注册表中,KCCQ分数在1年后不完整也很常见,可能是由于问卷的长度。本研究旨在a)评估简化的KCCQ评分在描述LVAD患者旅程中的效用,b)生成患者友好的hf-QOL轨迹图形,用于共享决策遭遇。方法分析来自MOMENTUM 3研究(2200例患者)的HeartMate 3 LVAD受者术前、植入后6- 12个月和24个月的KCCQ问题水平反应。患者必须完成一次术前和≥1次术后KCCQ评估才能纳入。简化后的LVAD-KCCQ如下:将5个域的23道KCCQ题简化为5道,每个域1道。反应选项从先前的5-7个选项中合并为严重、中度和最小/无。在每个时间点评估患者内部简化KCCQ域的变化轨迹。从术后6个月开始,总结标准和简化KCCQ评分以及每个简化域的基线持续改善(表1,图1)。每个域的患者内部改善发生迅速,并持续到2年。在LVAD前生活享受严重受限(蓝色)的患者(n=1133)中,分别有17.8% (n=202)和8.2% (n=93)在6个月和1年时持续存在严重受限。总体而言,63%的患者在2年内没有或只有最小限度的限制(图1A,图2)。其他简化的KCCQ结构域的反应也得到了类似的快速和持续的改善(图1B-C)。结论:对个体简化的KCCQ域反应的评估允许对HM3后患者旅程进行简洁的评估。这些数据可能有助于提高注册KCCQ数据的依从性,并向患者传达LVAD后hf-QOL的平均变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Interhospital Transfer for Heart Failure in the United States: A Patient and Hospital-level Analysis from GWTG-HF. Comparison of Inpatient End-of-Life Care Intensity Between Heart Failure and Cancer. Invasive assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Should network structure be considered in care coordination of heart failure transitions? Targeted potassium levels, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high arrhythmic risk: a reinterpretation of the POTCAST trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1