Comparison of different models for analyzing starch dynamic hydrolysis

IF 5.1 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Hydrocolloids for Health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.fhfh.2025.100200
Yuzhi Han , Cunxu Wei
{"title":"Comparison of different models for analyzing starch dynamic hydrolysis","authors":"Yuzhi Han ,&nbsp;Cunxu Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.fhfh.2025.100200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dynamic hydrolysis is an important property of starch, and hydrolysis parameters can provide information on starch qualities and applications in food and nonfood industries. The modified Michaelis-Menten equation (MME), single first-order kinetics equation (SKE), log of slope linear equation (LOSLE), or combination of parallel and sequential first-order kinetics equation (CPSKE) models are usually used to fit the dynamic hydrolysis data. In this study, the hydrolysis profiles of five starches were fitted by the MME, SKE, LOSLE and CPSKE models. The fits of the different models were evaluated using the sum of squares of residuals (SUMSQ), the fitting determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>), and the differences between the experimental and fitted data. When tested on the five starches, CPSKE model exhibited the best fit, LOSLE model had a better fit than did MME model, and SKE model had the poorest fit among them. Although these models had significantly different fitting qualities, the maximum extent of hydrolysis predicted by the different models was significantly positively correlated. The hydrolysis rate coefficient <em>k</em> fitted by the SKE model was significantly positively correlated with the <em>k</em><sub>1</sub> fitted by the LOSLE and CPSKE models, but had no significant correlation with <em>k</em><sub>2</sub> during phase 2 as fitted by the LOSLE and CPSKE models. The <em>k</em><sub>1</sub> and <em>k</em><sub>2</sub> values fitted by the LOSLE model were significantly positively correlated with the <em>k</em><sub>1</sub> and <em>k</em><sub>2</sub> parameters estimated by CPSKE model, respectively. This study could provide useful information for choosing fitting models for analyzing starch hydrolysis profiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12385,"journal":{"name":"Food Hydrocolloids for Health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100200"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hydrocolloids for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667025925000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic hydrolysis is an important property of starch, and hydrolysis parameters can provide information on starch qualities and applications in food and nonfood industries. The modified Michaelis-Menten equation (MME), single first-order kinetics equation (SKE), log of slope linear equation (LOSLE), or combination of parallel and sequential first-order kinetics equation (CPSKE) models are usually used to fit the dynamic hydrolysis data. In this study, the hydrolysis profiles of five starches were fitted by the MME, SKE, LOSLE and CPSKE models. The fits of the different models were evaluated using the sum of squares of residuals (SUMSQ), the fitting determination coefficient (R2), and the differences between the experimental and fitted data. When tested on the five starches, CPSKE model exhibited the best fit, LOSLE model had a better fit than did MME model, and SKE model had the poorest fit among them. Although these models had significantly different fitting qualities, the maximum extent of hydrolysis predicted by the different models was significantly positively correlated. The hydrolysis rate coefficient k fitted by the SKE model was significantly positively correlated with the k1 fitted by the LOSLE and CPSKE models, but had no significant correlation with k2 during phase 2 as fitted by the LOSLE and CPSKE models. The k1 and k2 values fitted by the LOSLE model were significantly positively correlated with the k1 and k2 parameters estimated by CPSKE model, respectively. This study could provide useful information for choosing fitting models for analyzing starch hydrolysis profiles.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析淀粉动态水解的不同模型的比较
动态水解是淀粉的重要特性,水解参数可以为淀粉的品质及其在食品和非食品工业中的应用提供信息。通常采用改进的Michaelis-Menten方程(MME)、单一阶动力学方程(SKE)、对数斜率线性方程(LOSLE)或并联和顺序一阶动力学方程(CPSKE)相结合的模型来拟合动态水解数据。采用MME、SKE、LOSLE和CPSKE模型拟合了5种淀粉的水解谱。采用残差平方和(SUMSQ)、拟合决定系数(R2)以及实验数据与拟合数据之间的差异来评估不同模型的拟合性。在5种淀粉的拟合检验中,CPSKE模型拟合最佳,LOSLE模型拟合优于MME模型,SKE模型拟合最差。虽然这些模型的拟合质量有显著差异,但不同模型预测的最大水解程度呈显著正相关。SKE模型拟合的水解速率系数k与LOSLE和CPSKE模型拟合的k1呈显著正相关,与LOSLE和CPSKE模型拟合的k2无显著相关。LOSLE模型拟合的k1和k2值与CPSKE模型估算的k1和k2参数分别呈显著正相关。本研究可为淀粉水解谱的拟合模型的选择提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Oleogels for development of future food products based on health orientation: Research progress, challenges and applications Application of whey protein-guar gum binary emulsion gels as fat replacer and delivery system for vitamin D₃ in low-fat yogurt Moisture content as a critical factor: balancing microstructural integrity and cooking quality in frozen potato starch noodles Hydrocolloid-assisted strategies for developing low-glycemic index rice: Mechanistic roles of starch modification, bioactive fortification, and processing innovations Valorization of soybean seed coat pectic fibers as functional food hydrocolloids with anti-obesity activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1