Developing and validating a scale of empowerment in using artificial intelligence for problem-solving for senior secondary and university students

Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100359
Siu Cheung Kong , Jinyu Zhu , Yin Nicole Yang
{"title":"Developing and validating a scale of empowerment in using artificial intelligence for problem-solving for senior secondary and university students","authors":"Siu Cheung Kong ,&nbsp;Jinyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Yin Nicole Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Empowerment enables students to be psychologically and affectively ready to leverage the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI). However, a theory-driven scale to extend empowerment into the use of AI for problem-solving is lacking. This study developed and validated an 11-item scale of empowerment in using AI for problem-solving (EUAIPS) based on a proposed conceptual framework that synthesises empowerment and AI-related literature. The EUAIPS scale encompasses impact, self-efficacy, and meaningfulness in using AI for problem-solving. We collected data from a diverse sample of Hong Kong senior secondary and university students before (N = 477) and after the course (N = 409). Results demonstrated that the EUAIPS scale with a three-factor structure had good reliability and validity. Students also felt significantly more empowered to use AI for problem-solving after a 14-h course using AI for problem-solving. These findings empirically support the affective dimension of AI literacy and show that psychological control/competence is particularly important for students to harness AI to solve problems at the affective level. This study presents a valid instrument for researchers and practitioners to measure empowerment in using AI for problem-solving and informs AI literacy curriculum designers about including learning activities to help students realise its impact, self-efficacy, and meaningfulness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empowerment enables students to be psychologically and affectively ready to leverage the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI). However, a theory-driven scale to extend empowerment into the use of AI for problem-solving is lacking. This study developed and validated an 11-item scale of empowerment in using AI for problem-solving (EUAIPS) based on a proposed conceptual framework that synthesises empowerment and AI-related literature. The EUAIPS scale encompasses impact, self-efficacy, and meaningfulness in using AI for problem-solving. We collected data from a diverse sample of Hong Kong senior secondary and university students before (N = 477) and after the course (N = 409). Results demonstrated that the EUAIPS scale with a three-factor structure had good reliability and validity. Students also felt significantly more empowered to use AI for problem-solving after a 14-h course using AI for problem-solving. These findings empirically support the affective dimension of AI literacy and show that psychological control/competence is particularly important for students to harness AI to solve problems at the affective level. This study presents a valid instrument for researchers and practitioners to measure empowerment in using AI for problem-solving and informs AI literacy curriculum designers about including learning activities to help students realise its impact, self-efficacy, and meaningfulness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为高中生和大学生开发和验证使用人工智能解决问题的赋权量表
授权使学生在心理上和情感上准备好利用人工智能(AI)的好处。然而,目前还缺乏一个理论驱动的规模来将授权扩展到使用人工智能来解决问题。本研究基于综合授权和人工智能相关文献的拟议概念框架,开发并验证了使用人工智能解决问题的11项授权量表(EUAIPS)。EUAIPS量表包括使用人工智能解决问题的影响、自我效能和意义。我们收集了香港高中生和大学生在课程前(N = 477)和课程后(N = 409)的不同样本的数据。结果表明,三因子结构的EUAIPS量表具有良好的信效度。经过14小时的人工智能解决问题课程后,学生们也明显感到更有能力使用人工智能解决问题。这些发现从经验上支持了人工智能素养的情感维度,并表明心理控制/能力对于学生利用人工智能解决情感层面的问题尤为重要。本研究为研究人员和实践者提供了一种有效的工具,可以衡量使用人工智能解决问题的能力,并告知人工智能素养课程设计师包括学习活动,以帮助学生实现其影响、自我效能和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion Play with AI (PL-AI): A play-centered, design-based curriculum for AI literacy in pre-K and kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1