Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education

Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380
Ashish Garg, K. Nisumba Soodhani, Ramkumar Rajendran
{"title":"Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education","authors":"Ashish Garg,&nbsp;K. Nisumba Soodhani,&nbsp;Ramkumar Rajendran","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and large language models like LLama, Palm2, GPT, Gemini, and Claude has revolutionized education by generating human-like text and contextually relevant responses. Our research investigates the impact of structured prompt training on students' learning in data analysis and programming. We experimented with 157 first-year engineering students divided into three groups: a control group (internet access, no GenAI), an experimental group 1 (internet and GenAI without prompt training), and an experimental group 2 (internet and GenAI with prompt training). The prompt training session included techniques like few-shot prompting, chain prompting, and the CLEAR framework. We assessed participants' performance in data analysis tasks using Python, with pre-tests and post-tests measuring their skills in programming across three Bloom's taxonomy levels (understanding, application, and analysis). ANOVA on post-test scores showed significant differences among the groups, with G3 (with prompt training) outperforming G2 (without prompt training) and the control group across all three levels, evidenced by higher mean scores (G3: 6.60, G2: 4.94, Control: 4.28), similar pattern observed in task completion also. These results underscore the effectiveness of structured prompt training in enhancing students' data analysis and programming skills. Our study highlights the potential of GenAI and structured prompt training to transform educational practices and suggests future research directions, including integrating prompt engineering within human-AI collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and large language models like LLama, Palm2, GPT, Gemini, and Claude has revolutionized education by generating human-like text and contextually relevant responses. Our research investigates the impact of structured prompt training on students' learning in data analysis and programming. We experimented with 157 first-year engineering students divided into three groups: a control group (internet access, no GenAI), an experimental group 1 (internet and GenAI without prompt training), and an experimental group 2 (internet and GenAI with prompt training). The prompt training session included techniques like few-shot prompting, chain prompting, and the CLEAR framework. We assessed participants' performance in data analysis tasks using Python, with pre-tests and post-tests measuring their skills in programming across three Bloom's taxonomy levels (understanding, application, and analysis). ANOVA on post-test scores showed significant differences among the groups, with G3 (with prompt training) outperforming G2 (without prompt training) and the control group across all three levels, evidenced by higher mean scores (G3: 6.60, G2: 4.94, Control: 4.28), similar pattern observed in task completion also. These results underscore the effectiveness of structured prompt training in enhancing students' data analysis and programming skills. Our study highlights the potential of GenAI and structured prompt training to transform educational practices and suggests future research directions, including integrating prompt engineering within human-AI collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过结构化的快速培训提高数据分析和编程技能:生成式人工智能在工程教育中的影响
生成式人工智能(GenAI)和大型语言模型(如LLama、Palm2、GPT、Gemini和Claude)的出现,通过生成类似人类的文本和上下文相关的响应,彻底改变了教育。我们的研究调查了结构化的提示训练对学生学习数据分析和编程的影响。我们对157名一年级工程专业学生进行了实验,他们被分为三组:对照组(互联网接入,没有GenAI),实验组1(互联网和GenAI,没有及时培训),实验组2(互联网和GenAI,有及时培训)。提示训练课程包括像几次提示、链式提示和CLEAR框架这样的技巧。我们使用Python评估参与者在数据分析任务中的表现,通过预测试和后测试衡量他们在三个Bloom分类水平(理解、应用和分析)上的编程技能。测试后得分的方差分析显示各组之间存在显著差异,G3(及时训练)在所有三个水平上都优于G2(未及时训练)和对照组,平均得分更高(G3: 6.60, G2: 4.94, control: 4.28),在任务完成方面也观察到类似的模式。这些结果强调了结构化快速训练在提高学生数据分析和编程技能方面的有效性。我们的研究强调了GenAI和结构化提示训练在改变教育实践方面的潜力,并提出了未来的研究方向,包括将提示工程整合到人类-人工智能协作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion Play with AI (PL-AI): A play-centered, design-based curriculum for AI literacy in pre-K and kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1