Deep learning-based strategies for evaluating and enhancing university teaching quality

Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100362
Ying Gao
{"title":"Deep learning-based strategies for evaluating and enhancing university teaching quality","authors":"Ying Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The education sector currently faces several challenges, including the subjectivity of evaluation methods, uniformity of data, and a lack of real-time feedback. This study aims to address these issues by leveraging deep learning techniques, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), to accurately assess and enhance the quality of university teaching. In contrast to traditional teaching quality assessment methods, which often lack rigor and comprehensiveness, this study introduces a precise and thorough evaluation framework. By integrating deep learning algorithms, the study seeks to improve the objectivity and accuracy of evaluations, facilitate personalized feedback, and foster innovation in teaching methodologies. The research process involves multiple complex stages, including data collection, preprocessing, feature extraction, model construction, training, validation, and results analysis. Multi-source data—comprising student performance data, teacher evaluations, course content, and student feedback—are used to create a robust dataset. Data encoding, standardization, and feature engineering techniques are employed to enhance model input. Experimental results demonstrate that the CNN model achieves prediction accuracies of 92% for “Excellent,” 88% for “Good,” 85% for “Average,” and 80% for “Poor” in the test set. These results underscore the model's high performance in classification tasks, particularly in accurately identifying high-quality teaching, with both high precision and recall. This study not only addresses a gap in the field by utilizing multi-source data for comprehensive evaluation but also validates the effectiveness of deep learning models in assessing teaching quality. Additionally, the study provides a foundation for developing targeted teaching improvement strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The education sector currently faces several challenges, including the subjectivity of evaluation methods, uniformity of data, and a lack of real-time feedback. This study aims to address these issues by leveraging deep learning techniques, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), to accurately assess and enhance the quality of university teaching. In contrast to traditional teaching quality assessment methods, which often lack rigor and comprehensiveness, this study introduces a precise and thorough evaluation framework. By integrating deep learning algorithms, the study seeks to improve the objectivity and accuracy of evaluations, facilitate personalized feedback, and foster innovation in teaching methodologies. The research process involves multiple complex stages, including data collection, preprocessing, feature extraction, model construction, training, validation, and results analysis. Multi-source data—comprising student performance data, teacher evaluations, course content, and student feedback—are used to create a robust dataset. Data encoding, standardization, and feature engineering techniques are employed to enhance model input. Experimental results demonstrate that the CNN model achieves prediction accuracies of 92% for “Excellent,” 88% for “Good,” 85% for “Average,” and 80% for “Poor” in the test set. These results underscore the model's high performance in classification tasks, particularly in accurately identifying high-quality teaching, with both high precision and recall. This study not only addresses a gap in the field by utilizing multi-source data for comprehensive evaluation but also validates the effectiveness of deep learning models in assessing teaching quality. Additionally, the study provides a foundation for developing targeted teaching improvement strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的大学教学质量评价与提升策略
教育部门目前面临着一些挑战,包括评估方法的主观性、数据的统一性以及缺乏实时反馈。本研究旨在通过利用深度学习技术,特别是卷积神经网络(cnn)来解决这些问题,以准确评估和提高大学教学质量。传统的教学质量评估方法往往缺乏严谨性和全面性,本研究引入了一个精确而全面的评估框架。通过整合深度学习算法,该研究旨在提高评估的客观性和准确性,促进个性化反馈,并促进教学方法的创新。研究过程涉及多个复杂阶段,包括数据收集、预处理、特征提取、模型构建、训练、验证和结果分析。多源数据——包括学生表现数据、教师评价、课程内容和学生反馈——被用来创建一个健壮的数据集。采用数据编码、标准化和特征工程技术来增强模型输入。实验结果表明,CNN模型在测试集中对“优秀”的预测准确率为92%,对“良好”的预测准确率为88%,对“平均”的预测准确率为85%,对“差”的预测准确率为80%。这些结果强调了该模型在分类任务中的高性能,特别是在准确识别高质量教学方面,具有很高的准确率和召回率。本研究利用多源数据进行综合评价,不仅弥补了该领域的空白,而且验证了深度学习模型在评估教学质量方面的有效性。此外,该研究为制定有针对性的教学改进策略提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion Play with AI (PL-AI): A play-centered, design-based curriculum for AI literacy in pre-K and kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1