Evaluation of early student performance prediction given concept drift

Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100369
Benedikt Sonnleitner , Tom Madou , Matthias Deceuninck , Filotas Theodosiou , Yves R. Sagaert
{"title":"Evaluation of early student performance prediction given concept drift","authors":"Benedikt Sonnleitner ,&nbsp;Tom Madou ,&nbsp;Matthias Deceuninck ,&nbsp;Filotas Theodosiou ,&nbsp;Yves R. Sagaert","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forecasting student performance can help to identify students at risk and aids in recommending actions to improve their learning outcomes. That often involves elaborate machine learning pipelines. These tend to use large feature sets including behavioral data from learning management systems or demographic information. However, this complexity can lead to inaccurate predictions when concept drift occurs, or when a large number of features are used with a limited sample size. We investigate the performance of different machine learning pipelines on a data set with change in study behavior during the Covid-19 period. We demonstrate that (i) LASSO, a shrinkage estimator that reduces complexity and overfitting, outperforms several machine learning models under these circumstances, (ii) a linear regression relying on only two handcrafted features achieves higher accuracy and substantially less predictive bias than commonly used, more complex models with large feature sets. Due to their simplicity, these models can serve as a benchmark for future studies and a fallback model when substantial concept or covariate drift is encountered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forecasting student performance can help to identify students at risk and aids in recommending actions to improve their learning outcomes. That often involves elaborate machine learning pipelines. These tend to use large feature sets including behavioral data from learning management systems or demographic information. However, this complexity can lead to inaccurate predictions when concept drift occurs, or when a large number of features are used with a limited sample size. We investigate the performance of different machine learning pipelines on a data set with change in study behavior during the Covid-19 period. We demonstrate that (i) LASSO, a shrinkage estimator that reduces complexity and overfitting, outperforms several machine learning models under these circumstances, (ii) a linear regression relying on only two handcrafted features achieves higher accuracy and substantially less predictive bias than commonly used, more complex models with large feature sets. Due to their simplicity, these models can serve as a benchmark for future studies and a fallback model when substantial concept or covariate drift is encountered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念漂移对早期学生成绩预测的评价
预测学生的表现可以帮助识别有风险的学生,并有助于建议采取行动来改善他们的学习成果。这通常涉及复杂的机器学习管道。这些倾向于使用大型功能集,包括来自学习管理系统或人口统计信息的行为数据。然而,当概念漂移发生时,或者在有限的样本量下使用大量特征时,这种复杂性可能导致不准确的预测。我们研究了不同机器学习管道在新冠肺炎期间学习行为变化的数据集上的性能。我们证明(i) LASSO,一种减少复杂性和过拟合的收缩估计器,在这些情况下优于几种机器学习模型,(ii)仅依赖两个手工制作的特征的线性回归比具有大型特征集的常用更复杂的模型实现更高的精度和更少的预测偏差。由于它们的简单性,这些模型可以作为未来研究的基准,也可以作为遇到实质性概念或协变量漂移时的回退模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion Play with AI (PL-AI): A play-centered, design-based curriculum for AI literacy in pre-K and kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1