Model-based analysis of the impact of an eco-scheme premium on the climate protection potential of short rotation coppice in Baden-Württemberg

Cecilia Roxanne Geier , Elisabeth Angenendt , Enno Bahrs , Jan Weik , Christian Sponagel
{"title":"Model-based analysis of the impact of an eco-scheme premium on the climate protection potential of short rotation coppice in Baden-Württemberg","authors":"Cecilia Roxanne Geier ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Angenendt ,&nbsp;Enno Bahrs ,&nbsp;Jan Weik ,&nbsp;Christian Sponagel","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and its direct payments constitute an important instrument for achieving the European climate target set for agriculture. In this context, the promotion of agroforestry can contribute to its application as a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction measure, for instance through carbon sequestration and fossil fuel substitution with fire wood. However, as this is a novel measure within the CAP, its contribution to climate mitigation objectives and the cost effectiveness of the current area payments under the eco-schemes are unclear. This study investigated the cost effectiveness of eco-scheme premiums within the CAP 2023, focusing on their potential to enhance climate protection through Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) in Baden-Württemberg (BW). We used a geospatial economic land use model with a life cycle assessment to evaluate the impact of varying premium levels on GHG emissions. Our findings suggested that increasing the premium to €400 ​ha<sup>−1</sup> ​yr<sup>−1</sup> could offset up to 1.5% of the current agricultural GHG emissions of BW. However, this effect did vary between 0.1% and 8% due to input uncertainties such as economic factors and mitigation potential. The resulting payments per ton of mitigated CO<sub>2</sub>eq ranged from €70 to €454, averaging €140. These results indicated that higher eco-scheme premiums could effectively promote SRC as a climate mitigation strategy, but their cost effectiveness is highly variable. Despite uncertainties in our model framework, which may influence these evaluations, our study provided valuable insights into the potential of eco-scheme premiums for climate protection. Although our findings were specific to Germany, they offer relevant guidance for EU policymakers responsible for designing national CAP strategies and eco-schemes. Further research should explore the additional benefits of SRC, such as biodiversity enhancement and soil erosion control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and its direct payments constitute an important instrument for achieving the European climate target set for agriculture. In this context, the promotion of agroforestry can contribute to its application as a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction measure, for instance through carbon sequestration and fossil fuel substitution with fire wood. However, as this is a novel measure within the CAP, its contribution to climate mitigation objectives and the cost effectiveness of the current area payments under the eco-schemes are unclear. This study investigated the cost effectiveness of eco-scheme premiums within the CAP 2023, focusing on their potential to enhance climate protection through Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) in Baden-Württemberg (BW). We used a geospatial economic land use model with a life cycle assessment to evaluate the impact of varying premium levels on GHG emissions. Our findings suggested that increasing the premium to €400 ​ha−1 ​yr−1 could offset up to 1.5% of the current agricultural GHG emissions of BW. However, this effect did vary between 0.1% and 8% due to input uncertainties such as economic factors and mitigation potential. The resulting payments per ton of mitigated CO2eq ranged from €70 to €454, averaging €140. These results indicated that higher eco-scheme premiums could effectively promote SRC as a climate mitigation strategy, but their cost effectiveness is highly variable. Despite uncertainties in our model framework, which may influence these evaluations, our study provided valuable insights into the potential of eco-scheme premiums for climate protection. Although our findings were specific to Germany, they offer relevant guidance for EU policymakers responsible for designing national CAP strategies and eco-schemes. Further research should explore the additional benefits of SRC, such as biodiversity enhancement and soil erosion control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1