How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study

Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361
Yuk Mui Elly Heung , Thomas K.F. Chiu
{"title":"How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study","authors":"Yuk Mui Elly Heung ,&nbsp;Thomas K.F. Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, has been increasingly integrated into education to change student learning experience. Current empirical studies have mixed results on how ChatGPT impacts student behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis explores whether and how ChatGPT impacts student behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. We used the PRISMA method to select, analyze, and report the results. We screened 766 articles from four databases and identified 17 empirical studies with 1735 students for analysis. We compared the effect on student engagement between ChatGPT-based and non-ChatGPT learning. We found a medium effect size on overall student engagement in ChatGPT-based learning in the random effects model. Our analyses further suggest that ChatGPT-based learning is more effective in fostering student behavioral (medium effective size), cognitive (large effective size), and emotional engagement (medium effective size) than non-ChatGPT learning. Our findings revealed ChatGPT is an effective tool for engaging students in learning. We also suggested three roles ChatGPT plays in fostering student engagement: personalized tutoring, programming and technical assistance, and content generation and collaboration. Our systematic literature review revealed potential risks and results in student disengagement, such as over-reliance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, has been increasingly integrated into education to change student learning experience. Current empirical studies have mixed results on how ChatGPT impacts student behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis explores whether and how ChatGPT impacts student behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. We used the PRISMA method to select, analyze, and report the results. We screened 766 articles from four databases and identified 17 empirical studies with 1735 students for analysis. We compared the effect on student engagement between ChatGPT-based and non-ChatGPT learning. We found a medium effect size on overall student engagement in ChatGPT-based learning in the random effects model. Our analyses further suggest that ChatGPT-based learning is more effective in fostering student behavioral (medium effective size), cognitive (large effective size), and emotional engagement (medium effective size) than non-ChatGPT learning. Our findings revealed ChatGPT is an effective tool for engaging students in learning. We also suggested three roles ChatGPT plays in fostering student engagement: personalized tutoring, programming and technical assistance, and content generation and collaboration. Our systematic literature review revealed potential risks and results in student disengagement, such as over-reliance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从系统回顾和元分析研究来看,ChatGPT如何影响学生的参与度
ChatGPT等生成式人工智能已越来越多地融入教育,以改变学生的学习体验。目前的实证研究对ChatGPT如何影响学生的行为、认知和情感投入有不同的结果。这篇系统的文献综述和荟萃分析探讨了ChatGPT是否以及如何影响学生的行为、认知和情感参与。我们使用PRISMA方法来选择、分析和报告结果。我们从四个数据库中筛选了766篇文章,并从1735名学生中确定了17项实证研究进行分析。我们比较了基于chatgpt和非chatgpt学习对学生参与度的影响。在随机效应模型中,我们发现基于chatgpt的学习对总体学生参与度有中等效应。我们的分析进一步表明,与非chatgpt学习相比,基于chatgpt的学习在培养学生行为(中等有效规模)、认知(大有效规模)和情感投入(中等有效规模)方面更有效。我们的研究结果表明,ChatGPT是吸引学生学习的有效工具。我们还建议ChatGPT在促进学生参与方面发挥三个作用:个性化辅导、编程和技术援助、内容生成和协作。我们系统的文献回顾揭示了学生脱离的潜在风险和结果,如过度依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion Play with AI (PL-AI): A play-centered, design-based curriculum for AI literacy in pre-K and kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1