Research on ultrasonic demulsification characteristics and parameter optimization of condensate oil emulsion

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2025.110185
Yuling Lü , Shihao Zhu , Ganggui Lin , Meng Wang , Ce Wang
{"title":"Research on ultrasonic demulsification characteristics and parameter optimization of condensate oil emulsion","authors":"Yuling Lü ,&nbsp;Shihao Zhu ,&nbsp;Ganggui Lin ,&nbsp;Meng Wang ,&nbsp;Ce Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cep.2025.110185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As natural gas wells advance through the mid to late stages of extraction, foam drainage processes are employed to sustain production capacity, leading to the formation of significant condensate emulsions. This study examines the effects of key factors on separation efficiency during ultrasonic dewatering of two representative condensate emulsions with varying viscosities, using single-factor and orthogonal experiments. The droplet size distribution was assessed using a microscopic observation system before and after demulsification. Results indicate that ultrasonic demulsification is an effective method for treating condensate emulsions and improving recovery rates. Optimal parameters were determined as 0.5 W/cm², 20 kHz, and a processing time of 20 mins, achieving complete dewatering (100 %) for separated oil samples alongside a notable separation efficiency of 83.1 %. Importantly, increases in sound intensity and processing time initially enhanced separation efficiency but subsequently led to a decline. Frequency exerted the most substantial influence on separation efficiency, followed by sound intensity, processing time had the least effect. Furthermore, under identical conditions, the first oil sample demonstrated a separation efficiency that was 17.4 % greater than that of the second sample. In practical terms, reducing emulsion viscosity can enhance ultrasonic separation efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9929,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 110185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270125000352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As natural gas wells advance through the mid to late stages of extraction, foam drainage processes are employed to sustain production capacity, leading to the formation of significant condensate emulsions. This study examines the effects of key factors on separation efficiency during ultrasonic dewatering of two representative condensate emulsions with varying viscosities, using single-factor and orthogonal experiments. The droplet size distribution was assessed using a microscopic observation system before and after demulsification. Results indicate that ultrasonic demulsification is an effective method for treating condensate emulsions and improving recovery rates. Optimal parameters were determined as 0.5 W/cm², 20 kHz, and a processing time of 20 mins, achieving complete dewatering (100 %) for separated oil samples alongside a notable separation efficiency of 83.1 %. Importantly, increases in sound intensity and processing time initially enhanced separation efficiency but subsequently led to a decline. Frequency exerted the most substantial influence on separation efficiency, followed by sound intensity, processing time had the least effect. Furthermore, under identical conditions, the first oil sample demonstrated a separation efficiency that was 17.4 % greater than that of the second sample. In practical terms, reducing emulsion viscosity can enhance ultrasonic separation efficiency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凝析油乳化液超声破乳特性及参数优化研究
随着天然气井进入中后期开采阶段,采用泡沫排水工艺来维持生产能力,导致大量凝析油乳液的形成。采用单因素试验和正交试验,考察了两种具有代表性的不同黏度凝析乳超声脱水过程中关键因素对分离效率的影响。用显微观察系统对破乳前后的液滴大小分布进行了评估。结果表明,超声破乳是处理凝析乳状液,提高回收率的有效方法。确定了最佳参数为0.5 W/cm²,20 kHz,处理时间为20 min,分离后的油样完全脱水(100%),分离效率达到83.1%。重要的是,声强和处理时间的增加最初提高了分离效率,但随后导致了下降。频率对分离效率的影响最大,声强次之,处理时间影响最小。此外,在相同的条件下,第一种油样的分离效率比第二种油样高17.4%。在实际应用中,降低乳化液粘度可以提高超声分离效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.30%
发文量
408
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification is intended for practicing researchers in industry and academia, working in the field of Process Engineering and related to the subject of Process Intensification.Articles published in the Journal demonstrate how novel discoveries, developments and theories in the field of Process Engineering and in particular Process Intensification may be used for analysis and design of innovative equipment and processing methods with substantially improved sustainability, efficiency and environmental performance.
期刊最新文献
Fluoride removal by precipitation-coagulation in high gravity reactors High-temperature heat pumps for industrial decarbonization: Technologies, integration strategies, and future perspectives The impact of a novel groove structure on flow transition and erosion resistance characteristics in 90° elbows Kinetic modeling of diuron degradation in a H2O2/UV non-ideal photoreactor using an axial dispersion model Yttrium aluminum garnet-supported Ni catalysts for hydrogen production through auto-thermal reforming of acetic acid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1