Territory densities of heathland breeding birds are enhanced by fire on military training areas

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03447
Jonas Brüggeshemke , Ole Henning , Thomas Fartmann
{"title":"Territory densities of heathland breeding birds are enhanced by fire on military training areas","authors":"Jonas Brüggeshemke ,&nbsp;Ole Henning ,&nbsp;Thomas Fartmann","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Heathland ecosystems have experienced severe declines. Today, the remaining heathlands suffer from succession and airborne nitrogen deposition. To counteract the negative effects of both, various management measures such as choppering, grazing, mowing or sod-cutting have been implemented. However, thus far, these measures only partially halted the loss of biodiversity. We compared environmental conditions and territory densities of characteristic heathland breeding bird species on 91 randomly selected plots in two large heathlands that vary in their long-term land use history: a military training area shaped by fire and a nature reserve where grazing dominates. Our study revealed strong differences in environmental conditions and territory densities. In the military training area, very open habitats accounted for more than two thirds per plot. By contrast, in the nature reserve, semi-open habitats had a share of more than one half per plot. Mean territory densities of open heathland species were 1.6 times higher in the training area compared to the nature reserve. By contrast, territory densities of semi-open heathland species did not differ. Overall, fire was assumed as the key driver of territory densities in characteristic heathland breeding birds. In comparison to traditionally managed heathlands, fire management of heathlands favoured breeding birds in two ways: First, through preserving the nutrient balance, which very likely had positive effects on insect food supply and may also on the formation of eggshells. Second, by creating early successional stages rich in bare ground that allow an easy access to invertebrate food resources. Based on our study, heathland management should aim at rejuvenating heathlands and creating early successional stages regularly without causing nutrient imbalances in the long run. Consequently, we recommend an extension of the area and frequency of prescribed burning in a mosaic-like manner in heathlands, especially outside military training areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heathland ecosystems have experienced severe declines. Today, the remaining heathlands suffer from succession and airborne nitrogen deposition. To counteract the negative effects of both, various management measures such as choppering, grazing, mowing or sod-cutting have been implemented. However, thus far, these measures only partially halted the loss of biodiversity. We compared environmental conditions and territory densities of characteristic heathland breeding bird species on 91 randomly selected plots in two large heathlands that vary in their long-term land use history: a military training area shaped by fire and a nature reserve where grazing dominates. Our study revealed strong differences in environmental conditions and territory densities. In the military training area, very open habitats accounted for more than two thirds per plot. By contrast, in the nature reserve, semi-open habitats had a share of more than one half per plot. Mean territory densities of open heathland species were 1.6 times higher in the training area compared to the nature reserve. By contrast, territory densities of semi-open heathland species did not differ. Overall, fire was assumed as the key driver of territory densities in characteristic heathland breeding birds. In comparison to traditionally managed heathlands, fire management of heathlands favoured breeding birds in two ways: First, through preserving the nutrient balance, which very likely had positive effects on insect food supply and may also on the formation of eggshells. Second, by creating early successional stages rich in bare ground that allow an easy access to invertebrate food resources. Based on our study, heathland management should aim at rejuvenating heathlands and creating early successional stages regularly without causing nutrient imbalances in the long run. Consequently, we recommend an extension of the area and frequency of prescribed burning in a mosaic-like manner in heathlands, especially outside military training areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在军事训练区开火,增加了石楠地繁殖鸟类的地盘密度
希思兰的生态系统经历了严重的衰退。今天,残存的荒原遭受着演替和空气中的氮沉降。为了抵消这两者的负面影响,实施了各种管理措施,如砍草、放牧、割草或割草。然而,到目前为止,这些措施只是部分阻止了生物多样性的丧失。我们在两个长期土地利用历史不同的大型石楠荒原上随机选择91个样地,比较了环境条件和特征繁殖鸟类的领地密度:一个是由火形成的军事训练区,一个是以放牧为主的自然保护区。我们的研究揭示了环境条件和领土密度的强烈差异。在军事训练区,每块地有三分之二以上是非常开阔的生境。相比之下,在自然保护区,半开放的栖息地每块地的比例超过一半。训练区开放石南草原物种的平均领地密度是自然保护区的1.6倍。相比之下,半开放石楠地物种的领地密度没有差异。总体而言,火灾被认为是希思兰特征繁殖鸟类领地密度的主要驱动因素。与传统管理的石楠荒原相比,石楠荒原的火灾管理在两个方面有利于鸟类的繁殖:首先,通过保持营养平衡,这很可能对昆虫的食物供应产生积极影响,也可能对蛋壳的形成产生积极影响。第二,通过创造早期的演替阶段,丰富的裸地可以很容易地获得无脊椎动物的食物资源。根据我们的研究,荒原管理的目标应该是使荒原恢复活力,并定期创造早期演替阶段,而不是长期造成营养不平衡。因此,我们建议在荒地,特别是在军事训练区以外,扩大规定的以马赛克式方式燃烧的面积和频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
Mapping knowledge and conservation gaps in Atlantic nurse shark research: A global North-South perspective Climate shapes biodiversity–mycorrhiza interactions to control forest carbon DNA macrobarcoding reveals seasonal differences and spatial heterogeneity in the diet of Chinese Milu (Elaphurus davidianus) in China Multi-source captive breeding maintains nuclear genetic diversity in Alpine musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster) despite severe mitochondrial erosion What helps in the short term may hinder later: High grass abundance caused by the sowing of a competitive grass species limits meadow steppic grassland regeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1