Indigenous Lands inhibit mining-induced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03540
Luiz Guilherme dos Santos Ribas , Mauro Galetti
{"title":"Indigenous Lands inhibit mining-induced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon","authors":"Luiz Guilherme dos Santos Ribas ,&nbsp;Mauro Galetti","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indigenous Lands (ILs) have been recognized as valuable tools for Amazon conservation. Originally established to protect indigenous rights and culture, they have unintentionally become essential for environmental conservation. ILs cover approximately 23 % of the Brazilian Legal Amazon and face significant threats, including from mining activities. Proposed legislative changes aim to facilitate mineral exploration within ILs, leading to an increase in mining claims and illegal mining activities. This study assesses the impact of ILs in the Brazilian Legal Amazon on mining-induced deforestation by comparing it to a counterfactual scenario in the absence of ILs. The results indicate that ILs are effective in avoiding mining-induced deforestation, preventing the accumulated deforestation of approximately 25 million hectares between 2004 and 2019. This corresponds to 20 % of all ILs’ territories and 4.7 % of the Brazilian Legal Amazon extension. Although their effectiveness has declined over the years, this underscores the importance of ILs in protecting nature and indigenous communities. The results also suggest that the individual impacts of ILs on mining-induced deforestation vary across the Brazilian Amazon. These individual variations highlight challenges in which decision-makers should strengthen governance, enhance enforcement, and implement targeted policies to safeguard the Amazon rainforest and indigenous rights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article e03540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous Lands (ILs) have been recognized as valuable tools for Amazon conservation. Originally established to protect indigenous rights and culture, they have unintentionally become essential for environmental conservation. ILs cover approximately 23 % of the Brazilian Legal Amazon and face significant threats, including from mining activities. Proposed legislative changes aim to facilitate mineral exploration within ILs, leading to an increase in mining claims and illegal mining activities. This study assesses the impact of ILs in the Brazilian Legal Amazon on mining-induced deforestation by comparing it to a counterfactual scenario in the absence of ILs. The results indicate that ILs are effective in avoiding mining-induced deforestation, preventing the accumulated deforestation of approximately 25 million hectares between 2004 and 2019. This corresponds to 20 % of all ILs’ territories and 4.7 % of the Brazilian Legal Amazon extension. Although their effectiveness has declined over the years, this underscores the importance of ILs in protecting nature and indigenous communities. The results also suggest that the individual impacts of ILs on mining-induced deforestation vary across the Brazilian Amazon. These individual variations highlight challenges in which decision-makers should strengthen governance, enhance enforcement, and implement targeted policies to safeguard the Amazon rainforest and indigenous rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土著土地抑制了巴西亚马逊地区因采矿而导致的森林砍伐
土著土地(ILs)已被认为是保护亚马逊的宝贵工具。它们最初是为了保护土著人民的权利和文化而设立的,但无意中却成为保护环境的必要条件。ILs覆盖了大约23% %的巴西合法亚马逊地区,面临着包括采矿活动在内的重大威胁。拟议的立法改革旨在促进在ILs内的矿物勘探,导致采矿索赔和非法采矿活动的增加。本研究评估了巴西合法亚马孙雨林中森林砍伐对采矿引起的森林砍伐的影响,将其与没有森林砍伐的反事实情景进行了比较。结果表明,ILs有效避免了采矿引起的森林砍伐,在2004年至2019年期间防止了累计约2500万公顷的森林砍伐。这相当于所有ILs领土的20% %和巴西合法亚马逊扩展的4.7% %。尽管这些年来它们的效力有所下降,但这凸显了ILs在保护自然和土著社区方面的重要性。研究结果还表明,在巴西亚马逊地区,ILs对采矿引起的森林砍伐的个别影响各不相同。这些个体差异凸显了决策者应加强治理、加强执法和实施有针对性的政策以保护亚马逊雨林和土著权利的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
No difference in the food composition between wolf × dog hybrids and wolves in Poland Prioritizing underground roosts for bat conservation in Kenya Drought alters the structure and assembly drivers of soil actinomycete and bacterial (non-Act.) communities in agroecosystems Differences in driving pathways of soil PLFA between dry–hot valley and humid regions in Southwest China Leveraging the multidimensional nutritional niche to inform conservation practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1