Waiting to be discharged from intensive care units: Key factors shaping patient and family experiences

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103961
Yingyan Chen , Jacqueline Peet , Lauren Murray , Mahesh Ramanan , Kylie Jacobs , Jane Brailsford , Amelia Osmond , Moreblessing Kajevu , Peter Garrett , Alexis Tabah , Carol Mock , Frances Fengzhi Lin
{"title":"Waiting to be discharged from intensive care units: Key factors shaping patient and family experiences","authors":"Yingyan Chen ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Peet ,&nbsp;Lauren Murray ,&nbsp;Mahesh Ramanan ,&nbsp;Kylie Jacobs ,&nbsp;Jane Brailsford ,&nbsp;Amelia Osmond ,&nbsp;Moreblessing Kajevu ,&nbsp;Peter Garrett ,&nbsp;Alexis Tabah ,&nbsp;Carol Mock ,&nbsp;Frances Fengzhi Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To explore the factors that facilitate and hinder intensive care unit (ICU) discharge processes related to patients and their family members.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a qualitative exploratory study conducted in three regional adult ICUs in Queensland, Australia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients and their family members (or patient representatives) in addition to daily reflections based on direct observation. A deductive content analysis was undertaken using the Structure, Process, and Outcomes framework, followed by an inductive approach to generate themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16 participants participated in interviews, involving 14 patients, one family member, and one patient representative. Four themes included a desire to be involved, being kept informed, uncertainty in waiting, and the discharge rush. Participants spoke about the desire to be involved in their care and discharge transition. There was a prevailing tension among patients about being kept informed. Although participants remarked that staff communication was reassuring, supportive, and comforting, they noted that timelines for discharge were often unclear, causing hesitation in the discharge process and minimal information before a sudden transfer. Uncertainty in waiting was frequently mentioned by the participants and also reflected in the daily reflections. This uncertainty led to consequences, such as discharge against medical advice and after-hours discharge rush.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this study support existing literature that underlines the importance of patient and family involvement in care, effective communication, and coordination during the discharge processes. After-hours discharge rush should be avoided for the safety of the patients and others on the wards.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>Gaining an understanding of patient and family perspectives on the ICU discharge processes can guide clinicians in developing strategies to improve the continuity and quality of care and therefore enhance patient safety during ICU discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103961"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To explore the factors that facilitate and hinder intensive care unit (ICU) discharge processes related to patients and their family members.

Methods

This was a qualitative exploratory study conducted in three regional adult ICUs in Queensland, Australia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients and their family members (or patient representatives) in addition to daily reflections based on direct observation. A deductive content analysis was undertaken using the Structure, Process, and Outcomes framework, followed by an inductive approach to generate themes.

Results

A total of 16 participants participated in interviews, involving 14 patients, one family member, and one patient representative. Four themes included a desire to be involved, being kept informed, uncertainty in waiting, and the discharge rush. Participants spoke about the desire to be involved in their care and discharge transition. There was a prevailing tension among patients about being kept informed. Although participants remarked that staff communication was reassuring, supportive, and comforting, they noted that timelines for discharge were often unclear, causing hesitation in the discharge process and minimal information before a sudden transfer. Uncertainty in waiting was frequently mentioned by the participants and also reflected in the daily reflections. This uncertainty led to consequences, such as discharge against medical advice and after-hours discharge rush.

Conclusion

The findings of this study support existing literature that underlines the importance of patient and family involvement in care, effective communication, and coordination during the discharge processes. After-hours discharge rush should be avoided for the safety of the patients and others on the wards.

Implications for clinical practice

Gaining an understanding of patient and family perspectives on the ICU discharge processes can guide clinicians in developing strategies to improve the continuity and quality of care and therefore enhance patient safety during ICU discharge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等待从重症监护病房出院:塑造患者和家庭经历的关键因素
目的探讨重症监护病房(ICU)患者及其家属出院过程的影响因素。方法对澳大利亚昆士兰州3个地区成人重症监护病房进行定性探索性研究。通过与患者及其家属(或患者代表)的半结构化访谈以及基于直接观察的日常反思来收集数据。使用结构、过程和结果框架进行演绎内容分析,然后采用归纳方法生成主题。结果共访谈16人,其中患者14人,家属1人,患者代表1人。四个主题包括参与的愿望,保持消息灵通,等待的不确定性,以及出院的匆忙。参与者谈到了参与他们的护理和出院过渡的愿望。病人之间普遍存在一种紧张情绪,就是不让他们知道情况。虽然参与者表示,工作人员的沟通是令人放心、支持和安慰的,但他们指出,出院时间表往往不明确,导致出院过程中犹豫不决,在突然转移之前信息很少。等待中的不确定性经常被参与者提到,也反映在日常反思中。这种不确定性导致了一些后果,如不遵医嘱出院和下班后匆忙出院。结论本研究结果支持现有文献,强调出院过程中患者和家属参与护理、有效沟通和协调的重要性。为了病人和病房内其他人的安全,应避免下班后的匆忙出院。了解患者和家属对ICU出院过程的看法可以指导临床医生制定策略,以提高护理的连续性和质量,从而提高ICU出院期间的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Lower quadriceps muscle mass assessed by ultrasound predicts intensive care unit mortality: A cohort study with prospective data collection Sound levels in single vs. double bed ICU rooms: A high-resolution sound study The relationship between alarm fatigue and burnout among neonatal intensive care unit nurses: A multi-center cross-sectional study Losing a close person to death in ICU: A thematic analysis of bereaved family members’ experiences of end-of-life care Greening the intensive care unit: The ethical responsibility of ICU nursing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1