ESG rating adjustment and capital market pricing efficiency: Evidence from China

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2025.103845
Lei Ruan, Jianing Li, Siqi Huang
{"title":"ESG rating adjustment and capital market pricing efficiency: Evidence from China","authors":"Lei Ruan,&nbsp;Jianing Li,&nbsp;Siqi Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.103845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings serve as an important reference for investors, enabling them to assess the fundamental information of companies and make investment decisions, thereby enhancing capital market pricing efficiency. Frequent adjustments to ESG ratings will bring incremental information to the capital market. However, the mechanism of this information affecting capital market pricing efficiency remains unclear. Therefore, this paper empirically investigates the impact of ESG rating adjustments on capital market pricing efficiency. It explores the underlying mechanisms, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 as a case study. The findings reveal a significant negative relationship between ESG rating adjustments and capital market pricing efficiency. Specifically, the greater the degree of ESG rating adjustment, the more pronounced the phenomenon of asset mispricing, leading to a reduction in capital market pricing efficiency. This conclusion holds robust after conducting a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanistic analysis suggests that ESG rating adjustments exacerbate the degree of information asymmetry and diminish analyst forecast quality, which in turn impairs asset pricing efficiency. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the negative impact of ESG rating adjustments on capital market pricing efficiency is more pronounced in non-state-owned firms, firms with no significant internal control deficiencies, firms operating in polluting industries, and firms located in the eastern and central regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103845"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings serve as an important reference for investors, enabling them to assess the fundamental information of companies and make investment decisions, thereby enhancing capital market pricing efficiency. Frequent adjustments to ESG ratings will bring incremental information to the capital market. However, the mechanism of this information affecting capital market pricing efficiency remains unclear. Therefore, this paper empirically investigates the impact of ESG rating adjustments on capital market pricing efficiency. It explores the underlying mechanisms, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 as a case study. The findings reveal a significant negative relationship between ESG rating adjustments and capital market pricing efficiency. Specifically, the greater the degree of ESG rating adjustment, the more pronounced the phenomenon of asset mispricing, leading to a reduction in capital market pricing efficiency. This conclusion holds robust after conducting a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanistic analysis suggests that ESG rating adjustments exacerbate the degree of information asymmetry and diminish analyst forecast quality, which in turn impairs asset pricing efficiency. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the negative impact of ESG rating adjustments on capital market pricing efficiency is more pronounced in non-state-owned firms, firms with no significant internal control deficiencies, firms operating in polluting industries, and firms located in the eastern and central regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
The impact of different recommendation algorithms on consumer search behavior and merchants competition Technological sanctions, research capacity, and unintended consequences New venture team faultlines and corporate innovation from the perspective of structuration theory Climate risk and corporate charitable donations –evidence from China Is new technology always good? Artificial intelligence and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1