The impact of different recommendation algorithms on consumer search behavior and merchants competition

IF 7.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2025.103943
Weiyi Zhang , Yong Wang
{"title":"The impact of different recommendation algorithms on consumer search behavior and merchants competition","authors":"Weiyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.103943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recommendation algorithms on platform markets can be categorized into neutral algorithms and non-neutral algorithms. We explore how these two algorithms affect consumer's search behaviors and merchant's competition behaviors based on a consumer search model. We found that as platform transitions from not providing recommendation algorithms to providing neutral algorithms and then to providing non-neutral algorithms, the price dispersion among merchants gradually increases, while the intensity of price competition decreases. When the difference in transaction utilities among merchants is small, providing neutral algorithms can enhance platform profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare. In the meantime, providing non-neutral algorithms always harms platform profits and social welfare, but still enhances consumer surplus. This study recommends that platforms should maintain a balance between neutral and non-neutral algorithms in the development of recommendation systems, where platforms can then guide merchants to focus their efforts and resources on product development and service improvement, rather than engaging in price wars and paid promotions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103943"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025001066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recommendation algorithms on platform markets can be categorized into neutral algorithms and non-neutral algorithms. We explore how these two algorithms affect consumer's search behaviors and merchant's competition behaviors based on a consumer search model. We found that as platform transitions from not providing recommendation algorithms to providing neutral algorithms and then to providing non-neutral algorithms, the price dispersion among merchants gradually increases, while the intensity of price competition decreases. When the difference in transaction utilities among merchants is small, providing neutral algorithms can enhance platform profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare. In the meantime, providing non-neutral algorithms always harms platform profits and social welfare, but still enhances consumer surplus. This study recommends that platforms should maintain a balance between neutral and non-neutral algorithms in the development of recommendation systems, where platforms can then guide merchants to focus their efforts and resources on product development and service improvement, rather than engaging in price wars and paid promotions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同推荐算法对消费者搜索行为和商家竞争的影响
平台市场上的推荐算法可以分为中立算法和非中立算法。本文基于消费者搜索模型,探讨了这两种算法对消费者搜索行为和商家竞争行为的影响。我们发现,随着平台从不提供推荐算法到提供中立算法再到提供非中立算法的过渡,商家之间的价格分散度逐渐增大,价格竞争的强度逐渐降低。当商家之间的交易效用差异较小时,提供中性算法可以提高平台利润、消费者剩余和社会福利。同时,提供非中性算法往往会损害平台利润和社会福利,但仍然会增加消费者剩余。本研究建议平台在推荐系统的开发过程中保持中立和非中立算法之间的平衡,引导商家将精力和资源集中在产品开发和服务改进上,而不是进行价格战和付费促销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
Can environmental courts inhibit corporate greenwash? Evidence from heterogeneous LLMs ESG disclosure uncertainty, “Pseudo patient capital”, and total factor productivity: Evidence from China's heavily polluting industries The influence of investor attention on stock price variations Impact of government environmental attention on urban green economy efficiency: Evidence from text analysis and a three-stage network SBM model Synergizing pollution reduction and carbon mitigation: Evidence from China's national AI innovation pilot zones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1