Ming Ren , Bohan Zhu , Chen Huang , Jianliang Wang , Hancheng Dai
{"title":"Multidimensional sustainability implications of alternative iron and steel industry decarbonization strategies in China","authors":"Ming Ren , Bohan Zhu , Chen Huang , Jianliang Wang , Hancheng Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The urgency of a rapid and deep decarbonization of the iron and steel (IS) industry cannot be overstated in pursuing China's carbon neutrality target. Beyond CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, the IS industry is also responsible for numerous non-climate impacts. We explored the impacts of alternative decarbonization options of the IS industry on economic cost, water, energy, CO<sub>2,</sub> and air pollutant emissions from a systematic perspective. While all decarbonization pathways yield co-benefits on air pollutants emissions for the IS industry, the profiles of carbon leakage and spillover effect depend strongly on technology choice. Mitigation scenarios focusing on hydrogen-based direct reduction result in increases of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from upstream energy supply. In CCS-led scenarios, fuel substitution could result in an expansion of charcoal-making and corresponding emissions of particulate matter. Thus, policymakers must consider the proper combination of upstream energy supply chain and decarbonization options for IS to avoid undesirable outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108136"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925000151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The urgency of a rapid and deep decarbonization of the iron and steel (IS) industry cannot be overstated in pursuing China's carbon neutrality target. Beyond CO2 emissions, the IS industry is also responsible for numerous non-climate impacts. We explored the impacts of alternative decarbonization options of the IS industry on economic cost, water, energy, CO2, and air pollutant emissions from a systematic perspective. While all decarbonization pathways yield co-benefits on air pollutants emissions for the IS industry, the profiles of carbon leakage and spillover effect depend strongly on technology choice. Mitigation scenarios focusing on hydrogen-based direct reduction result in increases of CO2, SO2, and NOx emissions from upstream energy supply. In CCS-led scenarios, fuel substitution could result in an expansion of charcoal-making and corresponding emissions of particulate matter. Thus, policymakers must consider the proper combination of upstream energy supply chain and decarbonization options for IS to avoid undesirable outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.