Exploring ethical research issues related to extended reality technologies used with autistic populations

Journal of responsible technology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100102
Nigel Newbutt, Ryan Bradley
{"title":"Exploring ethical research issues related to extended reality technologies used with autistic populations","authors":"Nigel Newbutt,&nbsp;Ryan Bradley","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article provides an exploration of the ethical considerations and challenges surrounding the use of extended reality (XR) technologies with autistic populations. As XR-based research offers promising avenues for supporting autistic individuals, we explore and highlight various ethical concerns are inherent in XR research and application with autistic individuals. Despite its potential, we outline areas of concern related to privacy, security, content regulation, psychological well-being, informed consent, realism, sensory overload, and accessibility. We conclude with the need for tailored ethical frameworks to guide XR research with autistic populations, emphasizing collaboration, accessibility, and safeguarding as key principles and underscore the importance of balancing technological innovation with ethical responsibility to ensure that XR research with autistic populations is conducted with sensitivity, inclusivity, and respect for individual rights and well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659624000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an exploration of the ethical considerations and challenges surrounding the use of extended reality (XR) technologies with autistic populations. As XR-based research offers promising avenues for supporting autistic individuals, we explore and highlight various ethical concerns are inherent in XR research and application with autistic individuals. Despite its potential, we outline areas of concern related to privacy, security, content regulation, psychological well-being, informed consent, realism, sensory overload, and accessibility. We conclude with the need for tailored ethical frameworks to guide XR research with autistic populations, emphasizing collaboration, accessibility, and safeguarding as key principles and underscore the importance of balancing technological innovation with ethical responsibility to ensure that XR research with autistic populations is conducted with sensitivity, inclusivity, and respect for individual rights and well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索与自闭症人群使用的扩展现实技术相关的伦理研究问题
本文探讨了在自闭症人群中使用扩展现实(XR)技术的伦理考虑和挑战。由于基于XR的研究为支持自闭症患者提供了有希望的途径,我们探索并强调了自闭症患者XR研究和应用中固有的各种伦理问题。尽管它有潜力,但我们概述了与隐私、安全、内容监管、心理健康、知情同意、现实主义、感官过载和可访问性相关的关注领域。我们的结论是,需要量身定制的伦理框架来指导自闭症人群的XR研究,强调协作、可及性和保障是关键原则,并强调平衡技术创新与伦理责任的重要性,以确保自闭症人群的XR研究在敏感、包容和尊重个人权利和福祉的情况下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of responsible technology
Journal of responsible technology Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
168 days
期刊最新文献
Towards responsible innovation ecosystems through social labs: Lessons from the field The Trustworthy AI Maturity Model (TAIMM): Integrating ethics and regulation across the AI lifecycle Revisiting the interplay of risks, expected benefits, and ethical implications of AI across varying automation and criticality levels in Arab and UK contexts Corplus: A new concordancer for exploring authentic texts with language corrections Enabling ethics mechanisms in the governance of algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1