Exploring research practices with non-native English speakers: A reflective case study

Journal of responsible technology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100109
Marilys Galindo, Teresa Solorzano, Julie Neisler
{"title":"Exploring research practices with non-native English speakers: A reflective case study","authors":"Marilys Galindo,&nbsp;Teresa Solorzano,&nbsp;Julie Neisler","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our lived experiences of learning and working are personal and connected to our racial, ethnic, and cultural identities and needs. This is especially important for non-native English-speaking research participants, as English is the dominant language for learning, working, and the design of the technologies that support them in the United States. A reflective approach was used to critique the research practices that the authors were involved in co-designing with English-first and Spanish-first learners and workers. This case study explored designing learning and employment innovations to best support non-native English-speaking learners and workers during transitions along their career pathways. Three themes were generated from the data: the participants reported feeling the willingness to help, the autonomy of expression, and inclusiveness in the co-design process. From this critique, a structure was developed for researchers to guide decision-making and to inform ways of being more equitable and inclusive of non-native English-speaking participants in their practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our lived experiences of learning and working are personal and connected to our racial, ethnic, and cultural identities and needs. This is especially important for non-native English-speaking research participants, as English is the dominant language for learning, working, and the design of the technologies that support them in the United States. A reflective approach was used to critique the research practices that the authors were involved in co-designing with English-first and Spanish-first learners and workers. This case study explored designing learning and employment innovations to best support non-native English-speaking learners and workers during transitions along their career pathways. Three themes were generated from the data: the participants reported feeling the willingness to help, the autonomy of expression, and inclusiveness in the co-design process. From this critique, a structure was developed for researchers to guide decision-making and to inform ways of being more equitable and inclusive of non-native English-speaking participants in their practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索非英语母语人士的研究实践:一个反思性案例研究
我们学习和工作的生活经历是个人的,与我们的种族、民族和文化身份和需求有关。这对非英语母语的研究参与者尤其重要,因为英语是美国学习、工作和技术设计的主导语言。一种反思的方法被用来批评研究实践,作者参与与英语优先和西班牙语优先的学习者和工人共同设计。本案例研究探讨了设计学习和就业创新,以最好地支持非英语母语学习者和工人在职业道路上的过渡。从数据中产生了三个主题:参与者报告了帮助的意愿、表达的自主性和共同设计过程中的包容性。从这一批评中,研究人员开发了一个结构,以指导决策,并告知在实践中更加公平和包容非英语母语参与者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of responsible technology
Journal of responsible technology Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
168 days
期刊最新文献
Towards responsible innovation ecosystems through social labs: Lessons from the field The Trustworthy AI Maturity Model (TAIMM): Integrating ethics and regulation across the AI lifecycle Revisiting the interplay of risks, expected benefits, and ethical implications of AI across varying automation and criticality levels in Arab and UK contexts Corplus: A new concordancer for exploring authentic texts with language corrections Enabling ethics mechanisms in the governance of algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1