Smart beta, “smarter” flows

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Empirical Finance Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2025.101580
Jie Cao , Jason C. Hsu , Linjia Song , Zhanbing Xiao , Xintong Zhan
{"title":"Smart beta, “smarter” flows","authors":"Jie Cao ,&nbsp;Jason C. Hsu ,&nbsp;Linjia Song ,&nbsp;Zhanbing Xiao ,&nbsp;Xintong Zhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2025.101580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We document that when smart beta ETFs are more actively traded, mutual fund flow sensitivity to multi-factor alphas increases significantly. This evidence is consistent with a friction hypothesis that active smart beta ETF trading reduces the costs of investing in non-market risk factors (e.g., SMB and HML). Consequently, when this friction is diminished, investors reward mutual fund managers more for multi-factor alphas. We show that the results are driven by sophisticated investors, ruling out behavioral explanations. The results are concentrated among mutual funds with high exposures to non-market risk factors. We further find that the gap between CAPM alpha and multi-factor alphas in explaining flows reduces when smart beta ETFs are actively traded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539825000027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We document that when smart beta ETFs are more actively traded, mutual fund flow sensitivity to multi-factor alphas increases significantly. This evidence is consistent with a friction hypothesis that active smart beta ETF trading reduces the costs of investing in non-market risk factors (e.g., SMB and HML). Consequently, when this friction is diminished, investors reward mutual fund managers more for multi-factor alphas. We show that the results are driven by sophisticated investors, ruling out behavioral explanations. The results are concentrated among mutual funds with high exposures to non-market risk factors. We further find that the gap between CAPM alpha and multi-factor alphas in explaining flows reduces when smart beta ETFs are actively traded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.
期刊最新文献
Identifying the underlying components of high-frequency data: Pure vs jump diffusion processes CDS and credit: The effect of the bangs on credit insurance, lending and hedging Forecasting multivariate volatilities with exogenous predictors: An application to industry diversification strategies Unveiling the villain: Credit supply and the debt trap Smart beta, “smarter” flows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1