{"title":"Machine learning model-based design and model predictive control of a bioreactor for the improved production of mammalian cell-based bio-therapeutics","authors":"Ashley Dan , Bochi Liu , Urjit Patil , Bhavani Nandhini Mummidi Manuraj , Ronit Gandhi , Justin Buchel , Shishir P.S. Chundawat , Weihong Guo , Rohit Ramachandran","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study is concerned with the development of reduced order machine learning (ML) and non-ML model representations of experimental and simulated bioprocesses and their implementation in model predictive control (MPC) strategies to quantify performance accuracy and computational efficiency compared with the original models. Results showed that ML models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) outperformed other reduced order models such as Kriging, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) in terms of performance metrics such as R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE for both experimental and simulated data. Experimental data were obtained from a fed-batch and perfusion-based bioprocess and an LSTM model was developed and implemented in an MPC open-loop optimal control strategy to determine optimal input trajectories to maximize key performance metrics such as product titer. For the 2 by 3 ODE simulation, results showed that an autoregressive ANN was the most accurate in terms of replicating the plant model dynamics under MPC conditions followed by the LSTM and transfer function (TF) representations, with the feedforward ANN not being able to fully capture the salient dynamics. For the 4 by 5 ODE simulation, the TF representation outperformed the feedforward ANN model which in turn was more accurate than the LSTM model. In terms of computational time, the plant model simulation time for an MPC solution is intractable for larger input-output sizes compared with the ML models. Overall, it can be seen the ML models such as ANNs and LSTMs, provide the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency as they can capture the inherent nonlinearities of the plant model but also are not computationally intensive compared to the full plant model which are often represented by ODE and/or PDE-based differential equations. ML models such as those developed in this study demonstrate practical methods of implementing advanced process control in highly nonlinear chemical/biological processes as part of the smart manufacturing/Industry 4.0 paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 106198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124003575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study is concerned with the development of reduced order machine learning (ML) and non-ML model representations of experimental and simulated bioprocesses and their implementation in model predictive control (MPC) strategies to quantify performance accuracy and computational efficiency compared with the original models. Results showed that ML models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) outperformed other reduced order models such as Kriging, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) in terms of performance metrics such as R2 and RMSE for both experimental and simulated data. Experimental data were obtained from a fed-batch and perfusion-based bioprocess and an LSTM model was developed and implemented in an MPC open-loop optimal control strategy to determine optimal input trajectories to maximize key performance metrics such as product titer. For the 2 by 3 ODE simulation, results showed that an autoregressive ANN was the most accurate in terms of replicating the plant model dynamics under MPC conditions followed by the LSTM and transfer function (TF) representations, with the feedforward ANN not being able to fully capture the salient dynamics. For the 4 by 5 ODE simulation, the TF representation outperformed the feedforward ANN model which in turn was more accurate than the LSTM model. In terms of computational time, the plant model simulation time for an MPC solution is intractable for larger input-output sizes compared with the ML models. Overall, it can be seen the ML models such as ANNs and LSTMs, provide the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency as they can capture the inherent nonlinearities of the plant model but also are not computationally intensive compared to the full plant model which are often represented by ODE and/or PDE-based differential equations. ML models such as those developed in this study demonstrate practical methods of implementing advanced process control in highly nonlinear chemical/biological processes as part of the smart manufacturing/Industry 4.0 paradigm.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.