Machine learning model-based design and model predictive control of a bioreactor for the improved production of mammalian cell-based bio-therapeutics

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Control Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106198
Ashley Dan , Bochi Liu , Urjit Patil , Bhavani Nandhini Mummidi Manuraj , Ronit Gandhi , Justin Buchel , Shishir P.S. Chundawat , Weihong Guo , Rohit Ramachandran
{"title":"Machine learning model-based design and model predictive control of a bioreactor for the improved production of mammalian cell-based bio-therapeutics","authors":"Ashley Dan ,&nbsp;Bochi Liu ,&nbsp;Urjit Patil ,&nbsp;Bhavani Nandhini Mummidi Manuraj ,&nbsp;Ronit Gandhi ,&nbsp;Justin Buchel ,&nbsp;Shishir P.S. Chundawat ,&nbsp;Weihong Guo ,&nbsp;Rohit Ramachandran","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study is concerned with the development of reduced order machine learning (ML) and non-ML model representations of experimental and simulated bioprocesses and their implementation in model predictive control (MPC) strategies to quantify performance accuracy and computational efficiency compared with the original models. Results showed that ML models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) outperformed other reduced order models such as Kriging, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) in terms of performance metrics such as R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE for both experimental and simulated data. Experimental data were obtained from a fed-batch and perfusion-based bioprocess and an LSTM model was developed and implemented in an MPC open-loop optimal control strategy to determine optimal input trajectories to maximize key performance metrics such as product titer. For the 2 by 3 ODE simulation, results showed that an autoregressive ANN was the most accurate in terms of replicating the plant model dynamics under MPC conditions followed by the LSTM and transfer function (TF) representations, with the feedforward ANN not being able to fully capture the salient dynamics. For the 4 by 5 ODE simulation, the TF representation outperformed the feedforward ANN model which in turn was more accurate than the LSTM model. In terms of computational time, the plant model simulation time for an MPC solution is intractable for larger input-output sizes compared with the ML models. Overall, it can be seen the ML models such as ANNs and LSTMs, provide the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency as they can capture the inherent nonlinearities of the plant model but also are not computationally intensive compared to the full plant model which are often represented by ODE and/or PDE-based differential equations. ML models such as those developed in this study demonstrate practical methods of implementing advanced process control in highly nonlinear chemical/biological processes as part of the smart manufacturing/Industry 4.0 paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 106198"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124003575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is concerned with the development of reduced order machine learning (ML) and non-ML model representations of experimental and simulated bioprocesses and their implementation in model predictive control (MPC) strategies to quantify performance accuracy and computational efficiency compared with the original models. Results showed that ML models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) outperformed other reduced order models such as Kriging, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) in terms of performance metrics such as R2 and RMSE for both experimental and simulated data. Experimental data were obtained from a fed-batch and perfusion-based bioprocess and an LSTM model was developed and implemented in an MPC open-loop optimal control strategy to determine optimal input trajectories to maximize key performance metrics such as product titer. For the 2 by 3 ODE simulation, results showed that an autoregressive ANN was the most accurate in terms of replicating the plant model dynamics under MPC conditions followed by the LSTM and transfer function (TF) representations, with the feedforward ANN not being able to fully capture the salient dynamics. For the 4 by 5 ODE simulation, the TF representation outperformed the feedforward ANN model which in turn was more accurate than the LSTM model. In terms of computational time, the plant model simulation time for an MPC solution is intractable for larger input-output sizes compared with the ML models. Overall, it can be seen the ML models such as ANNs and LSTMs, provide the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency as they can capture the inherent nonlinearities of the plant model but also are not computationally intensive compared to the full plant model which are often represented by ODE and/or PDE-based differential equations. ML models such as those developed in this study demonstrate practical methods of implementing advanced process control in highly nonlinear chemical/biological processes as part of the smart manufacturing/Industry 4.0 paradigm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习模型的生物反应器设计和模型预测控制,用于改善哺乳动物细胞生物疗法的生产
本研究关注实验和模拟生物过程的降阶机器学习(ML)和非ML模型表示的发展及其在模型预测控制(MPC)策略中的实现,以量化与原始模型相比的性能准确性和计算效率。结果表明,长短期记忆(LSTM)网络和人工神经网络(ANNs)等机器学习模型在实验和模拟数据的R2和RMSE等性能指标方面优于其他降阶模型,如Kriging、多元线性回归(MLR)和随机森林(RF)。实验数据来自进料批和灌注生物工艺,并开发了LSTM模型,并在MPC开环最优控制策略中实施,以确定最佳输入轨迹,从而最大化产品滴度等关键性能指标。对于2 × 3 ODE模拟,结果表明,自回归神经网络在MPC条件下复制植物模型动态方面最准确,其次是LSTM和传递函数(TF)表示,前馈神经网络不能完全捕获显著动态。对于4 × 5 ODE仿真,TF表示优于前馈ANN模型,而前馈ANN模型又比LSTM模型更准确。在计算时间方面,与ML模型相比,MPC解决方案的植物模型模拟时间对于更大的输入输出尺寸是难以处理的。总的来说,可以看到机器学习模型(如ann和lstm)在准确性和计算效率之间提供了最佳平衡,因为它们可以捕获植物模型固有的非线性,但与通常由ODE和/或基于pde的微分方程表示的完整植物模型相比,计算量并不大。本研究中开发的ML模型展示了在高度非线性的化学/生物过程中实施先进过程控制的实用方法,作为智能制造/工业4.0范式的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fixed-time sliding mode tracking control of a remotely operated vehicle based on fully actuated system theory Pre-Shift fill control of wet clutches in heavy tracked vehicles using velocity prediction and a model predictive control framework Safe reinforcement learning framework for high-obstacle climbing in heavy wheeled-legged robots Prior knowledge-augmented sparse wavelet spatio-temporal graph network for anomaly detection of electric submersible pumps Horizon-one model-predictive control with stability guarantee for a permanent magnet synchronous motor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1