{"title":"Machine learning in electrocatalysis–Living up to the hype?","authors":"Árni Björn Höskuldsson","doi":"10.1016/j.coelec.2025.101649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The introduction of machine learning (ML) models in materials science is seen as a paradigm shift in the field. These models enable the thorough exploration of vast material spaces previously deemed beyond the reach of computational studies, thereby accelerating the materials discovery process. In theoretical electrocatalysis, ML models are primarily used as surrogates for, or to complement, more costly <em>ab initio</em> simulations to predict material properties. Herein, the effects ML has had on the field of electrocatalysis are critically reviewed, with particular focus on the degree to which actual progress has resulted from its application. Although the effectiveness of ML in exploring vast material classes is undeniable, the irrational belief in its potential has led to its excessive utilization within the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11028,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Electrochemistry","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101649"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Electrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451910325000080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The introduction of machine learning (ML) models in materials science is seen as a paradigm shift in the field. These models enable the thorough exploration of vast material spaces previously deemed beyond the reach of computational studies, thereby accelerating the materials discovery process. In theoretical electrocatalysis, ML models are primarily used as surrogates for, or to complement, more costly ab initio simulations to predict material properties. Herein, the effects ML has had on the field of electrocatalysis are critically reviewed, with particular focus on the degree to which actual progress has resulted from its application. Although the effectiveness of ML in exploring vast material classes is undeniable, the irrational belief in its potential has led to its excessive utilization within the field.
期刊介绍:
The development of the Current Opinion journals stemmed from the acknowledgment of the growing challenge for specialists to stay abreast of the expanding volume of information within their field. In Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, they help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1.The views of experts on current advances in electrochemistry in a clear and readable form.
2.Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
In the realm of electrochemistry, the subject is divided into 12 themed sections, with each section undergoing an annual review cycle:
• Bioelectrochemistry • Electrocatalysis • Electrochemical Materials and Engineering • Energy Storage: Batteries and Supercapacitors • Energy Transformation • Environmental Electrochemistry • Fundamental & Theoretical Electrochemistry • Innovative Methods in Electrochemistry • Organic & Molecular Electrochemistry • Physical & Nano-Electrochemistry • Sensors & Bio-sensors •