Automated external defibrillator: Rhythm analysis and defibrillation on paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100873
Emma Menant , Delphine Lavignasse , Sarah Ménétré , Jean-Philippe Didon , Xavier Jouven
{"title":"Automated external defibrillator: Rhythm analysis and defibrillation on paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest","authors":"Emma Menant ,&nbsp;Delphine Lavignasse ,&nbsp;Sarah Ménétré ,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Didon ,&nbsp;Xavier Jouven","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to quantify the reliability of automated external defibrillators (AED) in paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (pOHCA) by evaluating the defibrillation and the shock advisory system efficacy. Furthermore, the relationship between the initial energy dose and patient outcomes is analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied data from all pOHCA cases (age &lt; 18 years) treated by the Paris Fire Brigade between January 2010 and December 2018, limited to those with available AED signals. The efficacy of shocks is the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are the shock advisory system performance, pre-hospital return of a spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival and energy dose. Energy dose, weight and age are compared using a Wilcoxon test according to the outcome’s values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,990 electrocardiogram strips extracted from 349 pOHCA cases were included in the study. Shock advisory system had a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 99.8% for the detection of shockable rhythms. Shock efficacy observed for all patients who received a shock was 83.1% and first shock efficacy for patients in initial ventricular fibrillation was 96%. Patients who received a shock had a pre-hospital ROSC rate of 74.3%, a survival rate at hospital admission of 71.4% and 34.3% at hospital discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study shows that AED detect shockable rhythm with a good sensitivity and specificity and that shocks are associated with a very high rates of termination of shockable rhythms in pOHCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to quantify the reliability of automated external defibrillators (AED) in paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (pOHCA) by evaluating the defibrillation and the shock advisory system efficacy. Furthermore, the relationship between the initial energy dose and patient outcomes is analysed.

Methods

We studied data from all pOHCA cases (age < 18 years) treated by the Paris Fire Brigade between January 2010 and December 2018, limited to those with available AED signals. The efficacy of shocks is the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are the shock advisory system performance, pre-hospital return of a spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival and energy dose. Energy dose, weight and age are compared using a Wilcoxon test according to the outcome’s values.

Results

A total of 1,990 electrocardiogram strips extracted from 349 pOHCA cases were included in the study. Shock advisory system had a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 99.8% for the detection of shockable rhythms. Shock efficacy observed for all patients who received a shock was 83.1% and first shock efficacy for patients in initial ventricular fibrillation was 96%. Patients who received a shock had a pre-hospital ROSC rate of 74.3%, a survival rate at hospital admission of 71.4% and 34.3% at hospital discharge.

Conclusion

This study shows that AED detect shockable rhythm with a good sensitivity and specificity and that shocks are associated with a very high rates of termination of shockable rhythms in pOHCA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动体外除颤器:儿科院外心脏骤停的心律分析和除颤
目的通过评估自动体外除颤器(AED)除颤和休克咨询系统的有效性,量化其在儿科院外心脏骤停(pOHCA)中的可靠性。此外,分析了初始能量剂量与患者预后之间的关系。方法我们研究了所有pOHCA病例的资料(年龄和年龄;巴黎消防队在2010年1月至2018年12月期间对18岁的儿童进行治疗,仅限于有AED信号的儿童。冲击的效果是主要的结果。次要结果是休克咨询系统的表现、院前自发循环恢复(ROSC)、生存和能量剂量。根据结果值,使用Wilcoxon试验比较能量剂量、体重和年龄。结果共纳入349例pOHCA患者的1990张心电图条。休克预警系统检测震荡性心律的灵敏度为89.4%,特异性为99.8%。所有接受电击的患者的休克疗效为83.1%,初始心室颤动患者的首次休克疗效为96%。休克患者院前ROSC率为74.3%,入院时生存率为71.4%,出院时生存率为34.3%。结论AED检测可震性心律具有良好的敏感性和特异性,冲击与pOHCA患者可震性心律终止率高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Young ERC Resuscitation Science Masterclass Journal Club article: the ARREST trial Preparedness deserts: a framework for understanding and addressing geographic inequities in bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Patient and arrest characteristics associated with rearrest and mortality following out of hospital cardiac arrest Characterization of external defibrillator output and its impact on defibrillation protection of medical equipment Corrective steps during neonatal mask ventilation – a narrative review of the evidence behind the MR SOPA acronym
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1