Fahd Mohamad Alqahtani , Mohamed Riad Youcefi , Menad Nait Amar , Hakim Djema , Mohammad Ghasemi
{"title":"Robust group intelligent models for predicting hydrogen density and viscosity: Implication for hydrogen production, transportation, and storage","authors":"Fahd Mohamad Alqahtani , Mohamed Riad Youcefi , Menad Nait Amar , Hakim Djema , Mohammad Ghasemi","doi":"10.1016/j.jtice.2024.105949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate hydrogen density and viscosity determinations are crucial for optimizing processes, enhancing energy efficiency, and ensuring safety in fuel cells and storage.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we propose new robust machine learning (ML) models using decades of data to predict hydrogen density and viscosity across various pressures and temperatures. The ML-based viscosity models were developed using 1063 measurements under pressure and temperature ranges of 0.006–216.443 MPa and 14–2128 K, respectively, while the density models were implemented using 368 data points covering pressure and temperature intervals of 0.098–216.443 MPa and 150–423.15 K, respectively. Our approach combines multilayer perceptron (MLP) and cascaded forward neural network (CFNN) models, integrated through the group method of data handling (GMDH), to form an advanced committee machine intelligent system (CMIS-GMDH). Additionally, new explicit expressions are implemented using multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP) to predict hydrogen density and viscosity.</div></div><div><h3>Significant findings</h3><div>The results demonstrated that the implemented correlations and CMIS-GMDH models offer precise predictions of the two parameters. Besides, analyses of the prediction performance exhibited that the introduced CMIS-GMDH is the most accurate paradigm by achieving small root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.0983 and 0.1754 for density and viscosity, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison with previous studies revealed that the CMIS-GMDH models yield superior accuracy in hydrogen density and viscosity estimations. Lastly, the physical validity of the best models was investigated by carrying out thorough trend analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 105949"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876107024006072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Accurate hydrogen density and viscosity determinations are crucial for optimizing processes, enhancing energy efficiency, and ensuring safety in fuel cells and storage.
Methods
In this study, we propose new robust machine learning (ML) models using decades of data to predict hydrogen density and viscosity across various pressures and temperatures. The ML-based viscosity models were developed using 1063 measurements under pressure and temperature ranges of 0.006–216.443 MPa and 14–2128 K, respectively, while the density models were implemented using 368 data points covering pressure and temperature intervals of 0.098–216.443 MPa and 150–423.15 K, respectively. Our approach combines multilayer perceptron (MLP) and cascaded forward neural network (CFNN) models, integrated through the group method of data handling (GMDH), to form an advanced committee machine intelligent system (CMIS-GMDH). Additionally, new explicit expressions are implemented using multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP) to predict hydrogen density and viscosity.
Significant findings
The results demonstrated that the implemented correlations and CMIS-GMDH models offer precise predictions of the two parameters. Besides, analyses of the prediction performance exhibited that the introduced CMIS-GMDH is the most accurate paradigm by achieving small root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.0983 and 0.1754 for density and viscosity, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison with previous studies revealed that the CMIS-GMDH models yield superior accuracy in hydrogen density and viscosity estimations. Lastly, the physical validity of the best models was investigated by carrying out thorough trend analyses.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (formerly known as Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers) publishes original works, from fundamental principles to practical applications, in the broad field of chemical engineering with special focus on three aspects: Chemical and Biomolecular Science and Technology, Energy and Environmental Science and Technology, and Materials Science and Technology. Authors should choose for their manuscript an appropriate aspect section and a few related classifications when submitting to the journal online.