Validación y adaptación cultural al español de la Rúbrica de retroalimentación del desempeño quirúrgico (SPR)

Q2 Social Sciences Educacion Medica Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101022
Jaime Andrés Leal , Daniela Gutiérrez Zúñiga , Stephanie Renza , Felipe Valbuena
{"title":"Validación y adaptación cultural al español de la Rúbrica de retroalimentación del desempeño quirúrgico (SPR)","authors":"Jaime Andrés Leal ,&nbsp;Daniela Gutiérrez Zúñiga ,&nbsp;Stephanie Renza ,&nbsp;Felipe Valbuena","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The training of medical professionals has shifted towards a competency-based model. In this context, the evaluation of surgical competencies is crucial to ensure standards of quality and competence. However, there is still a lack of standardized and validated tools for effective evaluation in our setting. The “Surgical Procedure Feedback Rubric” (SPR) was developed for this purpose but has not been adapted to Spanish. This study aims to translate, validate, and culturally adapt the SPR for use in surgical specialty programs in Latin America.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective observational study of cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the SPR was conducted from May 2020 to September 2021. The linguistic validation included forward and backward translation, review by an expert committee, and comprehension testing. The psychometric validation assessed face, content, convergent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 160 evaluations using the SPR were conducted, of which 129 were suitable for analysis. Cronbach's alpha was 0,9; indicating high reliability. Factor analysis revealed three latent factors related to pre-surgical care, collaboration and communication, and surgical techniques. No significant differences were found in evaluations based on the year of residency or surgical role.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Spanish adaptation of the SPR is a valid and reliable tool for the formative assessment of surgical residents. Its implementation supports the standardization of surgical competency evaluation in Spanish-speaking settings, facilitating effective and precise feedback in surgical training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 4","pages":"Article 101022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324001372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The training of medical professionals has shifted towards a competency-based model. In this context, the evaluation of surgical competencies is crucial to ensure standards of quality and competence. However, there is still a lack of standardized and validated tools for effective evaluation in our setting. The “Surgical Procedure Feedback Rubric” (SPR) was developed for this purpose but has not been adapted to Spanish. This study aims to translate, validate, and culturally adapt the SPR for use in surgical specialty programs in Latin America.

Methods

A prospective observational study of cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the SPR was conducted from May 2020 to September 2021. The linguistic validation included forward and backward translation, review by an expert committee, and comprehension testing. The psychometric validation assessed face, content, convergent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility.

Results

A total of 160 evaluations using the SPR were conducted, of which 129 were suitable for analysis. Cronbach's alpha was 0,9; indicating high reliability. Factor analysis revealed three latent factors related to pre-surgical care, collaboration and communication, and surgical techniques. No significant differences were found in evaluations based on the year of residency or surgical role.

Conclusions

The Spanish adaptation of the SPR is a valid and reliable tool for the formative assessment of surgical residents. Its implementation supports the standardization of surgical competency evaluation in Spanish-speaking settings, facilitating effective and precise feedback in surgical training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
期刊最新文献
The Simcup Morocco: Exploration of the concept, innovative pedagogical relevance, and perspectives Conocimientos, práctica y actitudes hacia la salud oral entre matronas de España Validación y adaptación cultural al español de la Rúbrica de retroalimentación del desempeño quirúrgico (SPR) Actitud del profesional de la salud ante la muerte de un paciente por error médico Percepciones y satisfacción sobre una prueba de progreso en estudiantes de medicina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1